Armstrong Teasdale Launches NY Office, Taking 16 More From Montgomery McCracken
The Midwest-based Am Law 200 firm made its East Coast debut last year in Philadelphia, also with a group from Montgomery McCracken.
January 28, 2019 at 02:10 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on New York Law Journal
Armstrong Teasdale has added another group of lawyers from Philadelphia's Montgomery McCracken Walker & Rhoads, halving Montgomery McCracken's New York office to launch its own presence in Manhattan.
The Am Law 200 firm, which is headquartered in St. Louis, is adding 16 real estate-focused lawyers from Montgomery McCracken to make its entrance to the New York market.
Andrew Brucker, Jeffery Dayon, Saul Mishaan, Charles Palella, Isaac Saufer, Howard Schechter, Julie Schechter and Phyllis Weisberg are joining Armstrong Teasdale as partners, the firm said Monday. Eight associates and additional staff will be coming along with those partners, the firm said.
Armstrong Teasdale made its East Coast debut just a few months ago, when it opened in Philadelphia in September. That office was also launched by Montgomery McCracken attorneys, including Richard Scheff, who had been Montgomery McCracken's executive chairman. He now leads Armstrong Teasdale's East Coast presence as managing office attorney for both Philadelphia and New York.
Montgomery McCracken now has 14 lawyers left in its New York office, according to the firm's website, including eight partners.
Scheff said he began talking with the New York group about joining Armstrong Teasdale shortly after his own move. The firm is looking to continue growth in both cities, he said.
“The lawyers in Philadelphia and the lawyers in New York are used to working together,” Scheff said. “From an integration standpoint, we're well ahead of the game.”
Armstrong Teasdale presented Scheff and his partners the opportunity to cross-sell nationally, especially in the Midwest, Scheff said, as well as cross-selling opportunities in other practices, particularly intellectual property. He also noted that being Midwest-based allows the firm to offer rate-sensitive clients a better price point for “similar or better expertise” than other New York practices.
Scheff said the New York lawyers, who focus on real estate law, are bringing along all their clients. He declined to state numbers with regard to their book of business, but said there is “significant revenue generated both in Philadelphia and New York” from the groups that joined this year and last.
When he joined Armstrong Teasdale last year, Scheff said he generated more revenue than any other lawyer at Montgomery McCracken.
All of Armstrong Teasdale's New York partners were part of smaller firms before they joined Montgomery McCracken through combinations in 2012, 2016 and 2017.
In August 2016, the nine lawyers of New York real estate boutique Schechter & Brucker all joined Montgomery McCracken, along with their staff. The combination created one of the largest real estate practice groups focused on cooperative corporations and condominium law in the city, according to Montgomery McCracken at the time. Andrew Brucker, Howard Schechter and Julie Schechter were all lawyers at Schechter & Brucker until 2016.
Partners Saul Mishaan and Jeffery Dayon were part of Mishaan Dayon & Lieblich, a four-lawyer firm whose attorneys and staff became part of Montgomery McCracken in March 2017.
The other three partners joining Armstrong Teasdale—Palella, Saufer and Weisberg—were previously part of Kurzman Karelsen & Frank, which Montgomery McCracken acquired in 2012 to launch its New York office.
In a statement Monday, Montgomery McCracken vice chairman and executive partner Richard Simins thanked the departing New York lawyers for their contributions to the firm.
“We've been planning for these departures for several months and we remain on course with our strategic plan to grow our footprint in multiple practice areas in New York,” Simins said. “We look forward to a period of growth under the leadership of our New York office managing partner, Bobby O'Connor.”
|Read More:
Armstrong Teasdale Plants Phila. Flag With 7 From Montgomery McCracken
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllA Look Back at High-Profile Hires in Big Law From Federal Government
4 minute readFederal Judge Named in Lawsuit Over Underage Drinking Party at His California Home
2 minute readGrabbing Market Share From Rivals, Law Firms Ramped Up Group Lateral Hires
These Law Firm Leaders Are Optimistic About 2025, Citing Deal Pipeline, International Business
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1The Key Moves in the Reshuffling German Legal Market as 2025 Dawns
- 2Social Media Celebrities Clash in $100M Lawsuit
- 3Federal Judge Sets 2026 Admiralty Bench Trial in Baltimore Bridge Collapse Litigation
- 4Trump Media Accuses Purchaser Rep of Extortion, Harassment After Merger
- 5Judge Slashes $2M in Punitive Damages in Sober-Living Harassment Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250