How to Identify the Right KPIs for eDiscovery Success
[ON DEMAND] Learn how to identify the most important KPIs, and explore how technology can be leveraged to estimate, control, and manage litigation and ediscovery budgets, timelines, and outcomes.
January 28, 2019 at 02:37 PM
3 minute read
Date: Tuesday, March 12, 2019
Time: 2:00 p.m. EST | 11 a.m. PST
Cost: Complimentary
Sponsored by:
Everyone knows metrics are important — but in a vast sea of options, which ones provide the most actionable insights?
Join Brett Tarr from Caesars Entertainment, Jenifer Johnston, Senior Deputy City Attorney for the City of Portland and Jennifer Bantelman from Zapproved as they demonstrate how to identify the most important KPIs, and explore how technology can be leveraged to estimate, control, and manage litigation and ediscovery budgets, timelines, and outcomes.
Join this webcast and walk away knowing how to:
- Determine crucial KPIs to focus on for eDiscovery
- How technology can help better identify and report on those KPIs
- How those KPIs help manage costs, timelines, and results
Start identifying which metrics are truly important for actionable insights.
REGISTER NOW!
Speakers:
Brett Tarr | Chief Counsel, E-Discovery and Information Governance | Caesars Entertainment Brett Tarr serves as Chief Counsel, Ediscovery & Information Governance for Caesars Entertainment and leads the E-Discovery, information governance, and privacy functions for the organization. | |
Jenifer Johnston | Senior Deputy City Attorney, Office of City Attorney | City of Portland Jenifer Johnston is a Senior Deputy City Attorney for the City of Portland. She joined the Office of City Attorney in 1998, becoming a Senior Deputy in 2013. Her litigation practice emphasizes employment and civil rights litigation in state and federal court. | |
Jennifer Bantelman, | Senior Director, Solutions Engineering | Zapproved Jennifer has worked in software and technology for the past decade, and currently leads product operations at Zapproved, where she ensures products are designed to assist companies as they enhance their ediscovery processes through technology and workflow improvement. Jennifer is a content director for the PREX Conference, and holds a Master's in Strategic Communication |
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllClimate Disputes, International Arbitration, and State Court Limitations for Global Issues
Judicial Face-Off: Navigating the Ethical and Efficient Use of AI in Legal Practice [CLE Pending]
4 minute readPreparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace Generative AI & Other Technologies
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Trump's Return to the White House: The Legal Industry Reacts
- 3Election 2024: Nationwide Judicial Races and Ballot Measures to Watch
- 4Climate Disputes, International Arbitration, and State Court Limitations for Global Issues
- 5Judicial Face-Off: Navigating the Ethical and Efficient Use of AI in Legal Practice [CLE Pending]
- 6How Much Does the Frequency of Retirement Withdrawals Matter?
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250