Korean-American Ex-Shareholder Lodges Bias Suit Against Greenspoon Marder
A lawyer for plaintiff Jun Chul Whang said she's seen an uptick in the volume of discrimination claims brought by Asian-Pacific attorneys.
January 28, 2019 at 06:20 PM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The American Lawyer
A Korean-American former shareholder at Greenspoon Marder who lost his job last year is suing the law firm for racial discrimination, alleging that the Florida-based firm and the New York boutique it acquired in 2016 systematically denied him opportunities because of his race.
In a complaint filed Friday in U.S. District Court in Manhattan, Jun Chul Whang outlined a history of alleged discriminatory conduct over the 24 years he spent at Jacob, Medinger & Finnegan that he claims continued when the firm was acquired by Greenspoon in April 2016. Whang said that the same partners who withheld opportunities at Jacob Medinger were also responsible for his termination from Greenspoon.
“Greenspoon's decision to terminate Whang was not a unilateral one based on neutral business needs, but rather, one involving a conscious, measured decision to terminate Whang versus the white attorneys/partners in his practice group,” his attorney, Veronica Jung, contended in the complaint.
Jung declined to comment on the case. But she noted that in the past year, she's seen an uptick in the number of similar claims put forth by Asian-Pacific attorneys.
“In my practice, most of the cases that we resolve on behalf of high-level and often high-profile employees get resolved out of sight—in prelitigation,” she said.
That, obviously, was not the case for Whang.
A litigator whose practice focuses on product liability defense, Whang started work with Jacob Medinger in 1992. According to the complaint, the firm focused on representing tobacco companies, with Imperial Tobacco serving as its largest client before the 2016 merger with Greenspoon.
Whang contends that he was a valuable contributor to the firm, bringing in new medical and scientific experts to aid in litigation and attracting other Korean-American attorneys who helped the firm attract new high-end corporate clients.
But he said that he faced overt discrimination with the firm. One example was when the firm's local counsel for a case in Poland asked for him to be taken off the matter, advising against having a lead attorney of Asian descent. Whang says the attorneys at Jacob Medinger acknowledged this request was offensive and discriminatory, but complied nonetheless.
Whang also said that it took him 12 years to become a nonequity partner and another 10 years to become an equity partner, when it only took white attorneys between one and five years to make that second jump. He contended that when the promotion finally came, it was not to reward him for service by allowing him to share in the firm's profits, but rather to defray the firm's potential liabilities.
His promotion came shortly before Jacob Medinger was acquired by Greenspoon, which was home to approximately 180 attorneys at the time. When that happened, the firm's other four equity partners received a payment representing return on equity; as the newest equity partner, Whang, did not, according to the complaint.
Whang continued to be a productive attorney at Greenspoon, the complaint says, with new clients coming on board and Imperial Tobacco poised to increase the legal budget for Whang's practice group in 2018.
But instead he was terminated in May. Whang said that he was told by Tim Finnegan, a name partner at Jacob Medinger, that the decision came from the firm's executive committee and was made to cut costs. But Whang was unconvinced, arguing that the Florida-based executive committee would have needed input from the New York team to determine who to cut loose.
“Specifically, given the significant increase in workload for plaintiff Whang's team on Imperial Tobacco matters, it is implausible that Greenspoon's executive committee would make decisions about terminating senior lawyers on plaintiff Whang's team without discussing the matter with plaintiff Whang's JMF colleagues,” the complaint said.
Whang also compared Greenspoon's treatment of him with how it handled Finnegan, who was close to retirement. While Finnegan, unlike Whang, was not involved in business development activities for Greenspooon, and had a smaller caseload, he was offered the opportunity to stay with the firm in an “of counsel” role, the suit claims. Whang did not receive this invitation and was fired with only 10 days' notice, according to the complaint.
Whang asserts that the sudden termination has left him with no job and diminished prospects, nearly eight months later.
A spokeswoman for Greenspoon did not immediately respond to a request for comment Monday.
Read More:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFlorida-Based Law Firms Start to Lag, As New York Takes a Bigger Piece of Deals
3 minute readEuropean, US Litigation Funding Experts Look for Commonalities at NYU Event
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250