Former US AGs: Attorneys Need to Be Flexible and Have IT Skills
At the opening keynote address for Legalweek 2019, former U.S. Attorneys General Alberto Gonzales and Loretta Lynch discuss the challenges facing both today's attorneys and Department of Justice employees.
January 29, 2019 at 02:16 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Legal Tech News
|
Legalweek 2019 kicked off with a keynote that included speakers from the highest level of the government: former U.S. Attorneys General Alberto Gonzales, who served in the Bush administration from 2005 to 2007, and Loretta Lynch, who served in the Obama administration from 2015 to 2017.
Both former attorneys general discussed a variety of topics, including how technology has impacted the legal industry, what they think of current privacy challenges facing consumers today, and how the next attorney general should manage the department. Here are highlights from the talk:
|A Need for Tech Education
Both Gonzales and Lynch agreed that because of the rapid pace of technology, today's legal industry is far different from the one they started in. "Lawyers should be prepared; no longer is it enough to be a wise counselor," Gonzales said. "To know the law you need to have IT skills, [and] you need to start learning those skills at law school."
He also advised lawyers and law students "to learn the importance of law for or about technology," adding that "the value now of businesses is not in brick and mortars, it is in intellectual property" and digital assets.
For Lynch, learning how to be flexible is as important as learning IT skills in this age of rapid change. "Technology changes rapidly … someone could learn a skill and be steeped in it only to find new methods and means" are the norm.
"So what I think is important … is to give [lawyers] mental flexibility to deal with those issues and the changing nature of the field."
|Having the Privacy Conversation
As attorney general during the government's battle with Apple over accessing an encrypted iPhone belonging to the gunman in the 2015 San Bernardino, California, shooting, Lynch had some thoughts on how the department could have handled that situation better.
"That was a flash point for a lot of people, and I think that is an example of the ways we can do a better job of communication those issues. … I don't know if the American people were focused on the tensions there."
Lynch noted that she does "support strong privacy measures and strong encryption … [after all], government runs on encryption. But finding a way law enforcement can access what is needed and still carry out the function [they need to do] is a conversation that still needs to be had."
Such a conversation, she added, is vital because the status quo is far from ideal. "It should not be and cannot be at this point just the government coming in and saying, 'Here is how we do this.' But at the same time, none of us can abdicate our responsibility to tech companies. Certainly one company does not get to decide for all of us how we get to handle our data."
|What the Next Attorney General Needs to Do
When asked what advice they had for the next U.S. attorney general, Lynch noted that it's important to consider the morale of the department and to "be as transparent to the American people but always keep looking forward."
Gonzales also imparted some wisdom that he had heard from a U.S. attorney while working as attorney general: "The DOJ is a castle; the AG is a moat around the castle and your job is to protect that. I never forgot that and it's true."
Discussing the current tensions that have plagued the DOJ over the past few years, Lynch noted that it's been hard to see the department weather controversies. "As someone who loves the department and has spent most of her career serving it and the American people, it's painful to see people lose faith in it and question the integrity" of those serving in the DOJ.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllIn Lame-Duck Session, US Senate Confirms Illinois Federal Judge on Bipartisan Vote
3 minute readRepublicans Grill Biden's NDNY Judicial Nominee Over Prior LGBTQ+ Bill Sponsorship
6 minute readGupta Wessler Represents Grieving Families in Baltimore Fatal Bridge Collapse
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250