Minority Women Are More Ambitious. Why Aren't They Getting Ahead?
Women of color are more likely to seek career advancement than their white counterparts, but they still can't win the race to the top in the legal profession.
January 29, 2019 at 08:41 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The American Lawyer
How ironic: Despite their low status as minorities among minorities, women of color are resolute in their determination to get ahead. In fact, minority women tend to be much more ambitious than their white sisters and, in some cases, more than white men.
That ambition seems counterintuitive, considering how few minority women make it to equity partnership in Big Law (2.81 percent) or the C-suite of major corporations (3.9 percent). Yet that's the revelation in the latest McKinsey & Co. and LeanIn.Org study on women in the workplace. Consider these findings:
- Minority women (76 percent or more, depending on ethnicity) are more likely than white women (68 percent) to seek advancement.
- Some groups of minority women aspire to obtain promotions more than men (83 percent of Asian women and 80 percent of black women vs. just 75 percent of all men).
- Asian women topped all groups of men and women in negotiating for raises and promotions (34 percent negotiated for raises and 44 percent for promotions vs. 29 percent and 36 percent for men, respectively).
- More women of color than white women want to be a top executive (38 percent of black women, 44 percent of Latina women and 51 percent of Asian women vs. just 29 percent of white women)
While we might expect a gender divide in workplace attitudes, what's jolting is the apparent ambition gap between women of color and white women. Though all women face enormous hurdles in reaching the top (remember, women make up only 20 percent of equity partners), white women dominate that select club. (The 2018 Vault/MCCA Law Firm Diversity Survey found that white women are making gains in law firms.) If any group should feel encouraged about going for the brass ring, it should be white women. Why, then, are more of them hanging back while women of color are fighting the daunting odds?
Some women of color say they feel they have no choice but to push forward. “Culturally, it's not unusual to find black, Hispanic or Asian women with family responsibility at an early age,” says Paula Boggs, Starbucks' former general counsel and the first female African-American partner at Preston Gates & Ellis (now K&L Gates). After her parents' divorce, Boggs says, she took care of her three siblings: “At 13, I was responsible for babysitting and standing in for my mom in certain situations. My story is typical in the African-American community.”
Sandra Leung, the general counsel of Bristol-Myers Squibb Co., says she's not surprised that minority women strive harder. “White women are used to relying on white men,” Leung says. “They are more supported in corporate environments.” As a result, she says, women of color feel they have to be more self-reliant: “I didn't think of relying on someone else. It's our reality.” With nine girls and one boy in her family, Leung says she “worked in all kinds of crazy jobs through school” and never thought of slowing her work pace: “I never took time off except for maternity leave.” She adds, “Work/life balance is an illusion anyway. It's conjured up to make us feel guilty. It comes down to making choices.”
Which brings us to this question: Are white women making the choice to be less ambitious because they can? To put it bluntly: Are they too comfortable, too well-off and too acculturated to traditional norms—like the idea that women's first priority should be home and children—to gun for top positions?
Indeed, it's hard not to consider the dynamics of privilege—white female privilege—in this discussion. But who's ready to go there?
Correction: An earlier version of this column said Paula Boggs was the first African-American partner of Preston Gates & Ellis.
Contact Vivia Chen at [email protected] or on Twitter @lawcareerist.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllThese Law Firm Leaders Are Optimistic About 2025, Citing Deal Pipeline, International Business
6 minute read‘A Force of Nature’: Littler Mendelson Shareholder Michael Lotito Dies At 76
3 minute readRemembering Am Law 100 Firm Founder and 'Force of Nature' Stephen Cozen
5 minute readLegal Departments Gripe About Outside Counsel but Rarely Talk to Them
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250