Lawyers Are Considering Benefits Over Risk With the Cloud
"The International Legal Cloud 2019: Discovery Security and Business Considerations," panel at Legalweek 2019 explored the deepening relationship between attorneys and the cloud.
January 30, 2019 at 02:48 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Legal Tech News
Weather comes and goes but the cloud is forever. That was more or less the major takeaway from the Legalweek 2019 panel titled "The International Legal Cloud 2019: Discovery Security and Business Considerations,"—which is really just a long-winded way of asking how lawyers are feeling about the cloud.
The short answer is lukewarm, but getting warmer thanks to encryption standards and the aforementioned inevitability of the whole deal.
"It's not a case of if you go to the cloud, it's when you go to the cloud," said Mark Anderson, a panelist and senior project consultant with Complete Discovery Source.
Based on the feedback that he's received from clients, lawyers are more interested in weighing the benefits of the technology than the risks.
On the benefits side, there's ease of access for clients and attorneys alike and the ability to travel internationally without a laptop full of sensitive information along for the ride. The risks are breach-related, constituting everything from a failure to protect a client's privileged data to running afoul the European Union's General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR).
In some cases, attorneys are weighing the scales while already making daily use of the cloud in their business practices—albeit unwittingly.
"Then you're talking to them they're actually using the cloud for their email systems and they don't even know it," Anderson said.
His fellow panelist Dera Nevin, a senior associate with Baker McKenzie, often asks lawyers where they think their email is stored only to have them point to a computer. The realization of how closely the cloud has already integrated into their personal lives can alleviate fears to a degree, but some are still hesitant to upload clients' trade secrets.
Nevin emphasized that lawyers with concerns regarding the security of the cloud have the background and training to negotiate terms with service providers. There are a couple of items that should crop up early in the discussions.
"It's very important to understand who actually owns the data," Nevin said.
The type of encryption that is being deployed while the data is in transit or at rest is also a big-ticket item. Some lawyers aren't comfortable with the service provider having access to the data and are insistent upon a private encryption key. Beyond the usual safety provisions, Nevin said that updating retention requirements to reflect GDPR mandates has become a major part of her practice.
Panelist Heidi Stenberg, who is a principal in the fraud investigation and dispute services practice of Ernst & Young, thinks that companies will continue to invest in the direction of the cloud.
As that happens, it will be important for organizations to maintain a data map to easily trace the location of a piece of stored information. "Having that evergreen and keeping that up to date is very important," Stenberg said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'You Can’t Do a First Draft of Common Sense': Microsoft GC Jon Palmer Talks AI, Litigation, and Leadership
Big Law Communications, Media Attorneys Brace for Changes Under Trump
4 minute readPolsinelli's Revenue and Profits Surge Amid Partner De-Equitizations, Retirements
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Cars Reach Record Fuel Economy but Largely Fail to Meet Biden's EPA Standard, Agency Says
- 2How Cybercriminals Exploit Law Firms’ Holiday Vulnerabilities
- 3DOJ Asks 5th Circuit to Publish Opinion Upholding Gun Ban for Felon
- 4GEO Group Sued Over 2 Wrongful Deaths
- 5Revenue Up at Homegrown Texas Firms Through Q3, Though Demand Slipped Slightly
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250