Lawyers Are Considering Benefits Over Risk With the Cloud
"The International Legal Cloud 2019: Discovery Security and Business Considerations," panel at Legalweek 2019 explored the deepening relationship between attorneys and the cloud.
January 30, 2019 at 02:48 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Legal Tech News
Weather comes and goes but the cloud is forever. That was more or less the major takeaway from the Legalweek 2019 panel titled "The International Legal Cloud 2019: Discovery Security and Business Considerations,"—which is really just a long-winded way of asking how lawyers are feeling about the cloud.
The short answer is lukewarm, but getting warmer thanks to encryption standards and the aforementioned inevitability of the whole deal.
"It's not a case of if you go to the cloud, it's when you go to the cloud," said Mark Anderson, a panelist and senior project consultant with Complete Discovery Source.
Based on the feedback that he's received from clients, lawyers are more interested in weighing the benefits of the technology than the risks.
On the benefits side, there's ease of access for clients and attorneys alike and the ability to travel internationally without a laptop full of sensitive information along for the ride. The risks are breach-related, constituting everything from a failure to protect a client's privileged data to running afoul the European Union's General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR).
In some cases, attorneys are weighing the scales while already making daily use of the cloud in their business practices—albeit unwittingly.
"Then you're talking to them they're actually using the cloud for their email systems and they don't even know it," Anderson said.
His fellow panelist Dera Nevin, a senior associate with Baker McKenzie, often asks lawyers where they think their email is stored only to have them point to a computer. The realization of how closely the cloud has already integrated into their personal lives can alleviate fears to a degree, but some are still hesitant to upload clients' trade secrets.
Nevin emphasized that lawyers with concerns regarding the security of the cloud have the background and training to negotiate terms with service providers. There are a couple of items that should crop up early in the discussions.
"It's very important to understand who actually owns the data," Nevin said.
The type of encryption that is being deployed while the data is in transit or at rest is also a big-ticket item. Some lawyers aren't comfortable with the service provider having access to the data and are insistent upon a private encryption key. Beyond the usual safety provisions, Nevin said that updating retention requirements to reflect GDPR mandates has become a major part of her practice.
Panelist Heidi Stenberg, who is a principal in the fraud investigation and dispute services practice of Ernst & Young, thinks that companies will continue to invest in the direction of the cloud.
As that happens, it will be important for organizations to maintain a data map to easily trace the location of a piece of stored information. "Having that evergreen and keeping that up to date is very important," Stenberg said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLaw Firms Look to Gen Z for AI Skills, as 'Data Becomes the Oil of Legal'
Law Firms Expand Scope of Immigration Expertise Amid Blitz of Trump Orders
6 minute readLatest Boutique Combination in Florida Continues Am Law 200 Merger Activity
3 minute readIncoming Howard University Law Professor Kiah Duggins Among DC Plane Crash Victims
Trending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250