Securities Class Action Filings Near Record High in 2018, Cornerstone Researchers Say
Cornerstone Research, which is based in San Francisco, found in its annual report that plaintiffs filed 403 new federal class action securities cases in 2018, down just 2 percent from a record high of 412 in 2017.
January 30, 2019 at 01:41 PM
3 minute read
Securities class action filings remained at near record levels last year, as public companies faced a greater threat of being sued than in any previous year, according to a prominent report released on Wednesday.
Cornerstone Research, which is based in San Francisco, found in its annual report that plaintiffs filed 403 new federal class action securities cases in 2018, down just 2 percent from a record high of 412 in 2017. However, core filings—which do not include cases stemming from mergers and acquisitions—ticked up to a total of 221 last year, the study found.
According to the report, one in 11 companies on the S&P 500 was sued in 2018, with firms in the health care sector being the prime target of new core filings. About 4.5 percent of companies listed on U.S. exchanges were hit with core filings in 2018, marking the sixth consecutive year that firms' exposure to the claims had increased. Including M&A filings, a record 8.4 percent of U.S. exchange-listed companies were sued last year, the report found.
The findings followed another report from NERA Economic Consulting on Tuesday, which noted an increase in settlement values last year had coincided with an uptick in securities class action filings. NERA's report pegged the total number of filings at 441 for 2018, up slightly from the year before.
Cornerstone, which partnered with the Stanford Law School Securities Class Action Clearinghouse, found that the 403 federal securities class actions filed last year were the second-highest on record, trailing only 2017. The volume of core filings in 2018 was the highest since 2008, when the financial crisis hit and filings surged due to volatility in the U.S. and global financial markets, the report found.
Meanwhile, filings stemming from mergers and acquisitions decreased to 182 in 2018 from 198 the year prior, but still registered the second-highest total since Cornerstone began separately tracking core and M&A filings in 2009. The study found that the Delaware Court of Chancery's 2016 rejection of disclosure-only settlements in Trulia had resulted in more merger-objection lawsuits being filed in federal courts, with courts in the Second and Third Circuits fielding nearly half of all filings in 2018.
The Cornerstone review found that three law firms—The Rosen Law Firm and Pomerantz, both in New York, and Los Angeles-based Glancy Prongay & Murray—were driving the increase in core filings over the last six years, though their rate of appointment as lead or co-lead counsel had not changed in recent years.
In total, Rosen, Pomerantz and Glancy Prongay accounted for 54 percent of all core filings in 201, and were appointed lead counsel in a little more than 40 percent of all cases. They were typically picked to lead cases whose size were smaller than the national average, Cornerstone said.
The firms, however, were also responsible for more individuals being named as lead plaintiff in core securities filings, reversing a trend from 2004 to 2012 when large institutional investors were more likely to play that role, according to the report.
“Starting in 2013, individuals were appointed as lead plaintiff more often than institutional investors. This suggests a shift in litigation strategies by some plaintiff law firms,” it said.
|This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllShareholder Activists Poised to Pounce in 2025. Is Your Board Ready?
NLRB Bans 'Captive Audience' Meetings, Yanking Away Platform Employers Used to Combat Unionizing
Trending Stories
- 1Elon Musk Names Microsoft, Calif. AG to Amended OpenAI Suit
- 2Trump’s Plan to Purge Democracy
- 3Baltimore City Govt., After Winning Opioid Jury Trial, Preparing to Demand an Additional $11B for Abatement Costs
- 4X Joins Legal Attack on California's New Deepfakes Law
- 5Monsanto Wins Latest Philadelphia Roundup Trial
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250