A Live Discussion About the Robust and Risky Lateral Market
Follow this conversation about the lateral hiring landscape.
February 04, 2019 at 03:13 PM
2 minute read
Lateral hiring in 2019 is a complicated task. The MeToo movement has placed lateral hires under a microscope, and with a recession anticipated to strike in the next few years, the risk involved in the lateral decision-making process is as high as it's been. But despite it all, the lateral market remains a key source of growth used by nearly every member of the Am Law 200.
As Nicholas Bruch, Michael A. Ellenhorn and Howard Rosenberg wrote in the Laterals Report in the February edition of The American Lawyer, an estimated $17.1 billion in business moved with lateral partners over the past five years. Faced with so much risk and uncertainty, the authors contend, law firms' lateral hiring process is due for an overhaul.
What might a new approach to hiring look like? How could the complications of the current moment influence lateral hiring in the long term? And what will separate the wheat from the chaff as firms move forward into the future of hiring? For answers and insight, follow the discussion below between Bruch, ALM Intelligence's principal analyst, and Ben Seal, executive editor of The American Lawyer, which will take place Feb. 5. Email us if you have other questions you want us to tackle: [email protected] and [email protected]. Thanks for joining the discussion!
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllKing & Spalding E-Discovery Director Jumps to Nebraska Women-Owned Firm
4 minute readBaker McKenzie Builds on AI Foundation, Crafting Tools to Help Lawyers Work 'Better, Smarter'
10 minute readPaul Weiss, Trailblazer for US Firms in China, to Close Beijing Office
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Trump Seeks to Have Georgia Election Case Dismissed, Cites Presidential Immunity
- 2Elon Musk Has a Lot More than a Tornetta Appeal to Resolve in Delaware
- 3Case Will Test If Wrongful-Death Suit Can Be Brought for Fetus
- 4Venezuelan Man Convicted in Laken Riley's Killing Asks for a New Trial
- 5'I Had a Great Run': Longtime Brooklyn Civil Administrative Judge Lawrence Knipel to Step Down
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250