The Key to Survival for Midsize Firms in the Next Recession? Running 'Like a Business'
Firms that learned to be "disciplined" during the last recession and stayed that way after the economy bounced back are better positioned to survive the inevitable next downturn than those that made only temporary adjustments, firm leaders said.
February 04, 2019 at 02:21 PM
5 minute read
Editor's Note: This story is adapted from ALM's Mid-Market Report. For more business of law coverage exclusively geared toward midsize firms, sign up for a free trial subscription to ALM's weekly newsletter, The Mid-Market Report.
Law firms are not immune to recessions.
That's unlikely to come as news to anybody in the legal industry in 2019, but 10 years ago, that realization took more than a few unsuspecting firms by surprise, recalls Paul Hughes, managing partner of New Haven, Connecticut-based Wiggin and Dana.
“The Great Recession was really the first time in my years of practicing where law firm profits were going down—not just shrinking a bit or stabilizing—but going down,” Hughes said. “Law firm head counts were going down year over year. A lot of that drove the need to really manage law firms as a business.”
Firms that learned to be “disciplined” during the last recession and stayed that way after the economy bounced back are better positioned to survive the inevitable next downturn than those that made only temporary adjustments, according to Hughes.
“Historically, firms have gotten bloated, fat and happy during the good times and then shrunk a little in the leaner times,” he said. “I think the firms that got lean and ran like businesses [during the Great Recession] and have participated in the current expansion meaningfully…and continue to run in a lean, business-like manner are going to be fine [in the next recession]. The ones who haven't, they're going to struggle.”
R. Max Crane, managing partner of 130-lawyer Sills Cummis & Gross in Newark, New Jersey, said firm leaders have a responsibility to manage their businesses with the recognition that another recession is always somewhere on the horizon.
Crane said his firm has been on a sustained upswing recently, with new business coming in, lawyers working “at or near capacity” and high morale at the office. Despite that, when it comes to the next economic downturn, “I always assume it's going to be tomorrow,” he said.
“Part of my job is to say, 'slow down,'” Crane said. “Law business, like other business, goes in cycles…The real test, the real mettle of a firm, is what you do in difficult times.”
For Los Angeles-based Raines Feldman, preparing for difficult times has meant strategically building a diverse collection of practices designed to maintain stability throughout the economic cycle.
“Last year, we brought in a bankruptcy partner from Venable,” Feldman said by way of example. “When we're slow” in the corporate and transactional practice, he said, “this group will be filled up.”
But almost regardless of practice focus, the concept of running a midsize firm ”like a business” can be boiled down to two basic tenets: (1) manage your expenses and (2) listen to your customers.
As purchasers of legal services have become increasingly sophisticated in the decade since the Great Recession, it's no longer enough for midsize firms to offer a cheaper alternative. They need to offer a more valuable alternative, according to Hughes.
“It would be disingenuous to say price doesn't matter,” Hughes said. “Of course it matters to the client, but I'm a little past price, in a way. Ten years is a long time and while price is still a factor, I don't think of the clients as caring about price per se. It's marrying the right price to the right issue.”
The ability to offer clients high-caliber lawyers at comparatively lower rates than larger firms requires midsize firms to keep a keen eye on their expenses.
Hughes said the leg up for a firm like 150-lawyer Wiggin and Dana—which has four locations across Connecticut and small offices in New York City, Philadelphia, Washington, D.C. and Palm Beach, Florida—is “less a pricing advantage and more an overhead advantage.”
“For the quality of lawyer we can bring to bear on a client's issue, we have pretty low overhead,” he said. “That has everything to do with where our offices are located.”
But again, as Hughes stressed, price is just one component of value. The smart midsize firms learned during the recession that the real value-add is in exceptional client service, he said.
For Wiggin and Dana, Hughes said, that has meant making an effort to learn about clients' businesses and the issues they face in their industries. That way, the firm can offer holistic legal advice that takes into account more than just the single matter that happens to be at the forefront at any given time.
“There is a mindset shift from telling clients what we do to asking what they need,” he said.
But, Hughes acknowledged, that's a concept many lawyers are not comfortable with and that lawyers of a certain generation simply didn't have to invest as much energy in prior to the Great Recession.
“Every day, every interaction is the audition for that project and the next one,” Hughes said. “That wasn't the case 20 years ago. Some people take that as a negative, but I don't mean by that that clients have somehow changed for the worse. Somebody will say, 'Wow, the profession has gotten really tough.' But again, I see it as an opportunity. We have very grateful and engaged clients.”
A brass-tacks approach to business administration will help midsize firms to weather the next recession, but, as we'll examine next week, true growth in the future will require thinking outside the box and possibly making some difficult decisions.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHow This Dark Horse Firm Became a Major Player in China
Colgate Faces Class Actions Over ‘Deceptive Marketing’ of Children’s Toothpaste
Internal Whistleblowing Surged Globally in 2024, So Why Were US Numbers Flat?
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1E-Discovery Provider Casepoint Merges With Government Software Company OPEXUS
- 2How I Made Partner: 'Focus on Being the Best Advocate for Clients,' Says Lauren Reichardt of Cooley
- 3People in the News—Jan. 27, 2025—Barley Snyder
- 4UK Firm Womble Bond to Roll Out AI Tool Across Whole Firm
- 5Starbucks Hands New CLO Hefty Raise, Says He Fosters 'Environment of Courage and Joy'
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250