How I Made Partner: Baker McKenzie's Brandon Moseberry
"Learn to make yourself indispensable by developing a subject matter expertise and taking ownership of matters, as well as learning to not be selfish with your time."
February 06, 2019 at 12:32 PM
5 minute read
Brandon F. Moseberry, 33, Baker McKenzie
Office: Chicago.
Practice area: Data privacy and cybersecurity.
Law school: Northwestern Pritzker School of Law, 2010.
How long have you been at the firm? Eight years.
How long were you an associate at the firm? Seven years.
Were you an associate at another firm before joining your present firm? No. I summered at Baker McKenzie as a first- and second-year law student.
When did you make partner at your current firm? January 2019.
Brandon Moseberry of Baker McKenzie (Courtesy photo)What's the biggest surprise you experienced in becoming partner? I'm still new to the role, and so far it's been close to what I expected.
What do you think was the deciding point for the firm in making you partner? Was it your performance on a specific case? It was a combination of developing relationships at the firm and a subject matter expertise, as well as learning to not be selfish with my time. I was fortunate enough to intern at Baker McKenzie in college, and I summered at the firm after my first and second years of law school. This allowed me to establish relationships that I leaned on to understand the firm and what it took to matriculate to partner. The pivotal moment was likely my third year at Baker, when an eighth year associate and primary work provider moved to an in-house role. Although it was a lot of responsibility to take on as a third year, I saw her departure as an opportunity to become the go-to associate on consumer data privacy issues. So in my “spare time,” I read and watched as much as I could to understand the technologies and key privacy issues for clients in order to take on the additional responsibility. Lastly, I'd credit learning to not be selfish with my time, which meant taking on matters outside of my comfort zone or under tight or inconvenient time constraints.
Describe how you feel now about your career, now that you've made partner. I'm definitely proud of the accomplishment and excited to have an opportunity to shape my practice and serve as a mentor/example for colleagues coming up the ranks. I was on parental leave when I learned I made partner, so the accomplishment didn't really hit me until I returned from leave and changed my email signature.
What's the key to successful business development in your opinion? Although not revelatory, I believe clients enjoy working with people they like, so I've focused on first developing personal relationships with people, because the work will likely follow. I also focus on providing practical, business-oriented advice that helps clients push the business forward. Otherwise, I'm not a value-add.
What's been the biggest change, day to day, in your routine since becoming partner Thus far, the day to day has generally remained the same given how much responsibility I was given as a senior associate. There are certainly more meetings, emails and bills to review, which is bit of a change.
Who had the greatest influence in your career that helped propel you to partner? It's difficult to name just one. Two leaders in my practice group, Brian Hengesbaugh (partner) and Amy de La Lama (partner), were instrumental in my matriculation to partner. They invested in me from the beginning, presenting me with every opportunity to succeed at the firm and trusting me to lead significant matters. Karen Sewell (the eighth-year associate mentioned above) also played a significant role in the beginning of my career by mentoring me and helping me refine my skills as an attorney.
What's the best piece of advice you could give an associate who wants to make partner? Learn to make yourself indispensable by developing a subject matter expertise and taking ownership of matters, as well as learning to not be selfish with your time. Practically, this means supplemental reading on your off-time and when taking on assignments, coming up with a proposed solution rather than simply asking the senior associate/partner to provide the answer. My approach developed into something along the lines of, “Here is the issue, here is what I'm proposing and why,” and have the senior associate/partner let me know if and where they disagreed. Lastly, be nice to people and have a sense of humor, because life is short and first and last impressions matter.
Got a suggestion for a new partner to profile here? Email [email protected].
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllShareholder Activists Poised to Pounce in 2025. Is Your Board Ready?
NLRB Bans 'Captive Audience' Meetings, Yanking Away Platform Employers Used to Combat Unionizing
Trending Stories
- 1Elon Musk Names Microsoft, Calif. AG to Amended OpenAI Suit
- 2Trump’s Plan to Purge Democracy
- 3Baltimore City Govt., After Winning Opioid Jury Trial, Preparing to Demand an Additional $11B for Abatement Costs
- 4X Joins Legal Attack on California's New Deepfakes Law
- 5Monsanto Wins Latest Philadelphia Roundup Trial
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250