US Attorney McSwain Files Action to Stop Phila. Safe Injection Site
In a first-in-the-nation lawsuit, the U.S. Attorney's Office is seeking a declaratory judgment that says safe injection sites, where heroin users can inject the drug under the supervision of medical staff, violate provisions of the Controlled Substances Act.
February 06, 2019 at 02:52 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The Legal Intelligencer
The U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania on Wednesday announced a federal lawsuit to have safe injection sites in Philadelphia declared illegal in a first-of-its-kind action in the nation.
U.S. Attorney William McSwain's office had filed the lawsuit Tuesday, asking for a declaratory judgment that says safe injection sites, where heroin users can inject the drug under the supervision of medical staff, violates provisions of the Controlled Substances Act. The case, United States v. Safehouse, has been assigned to U.S. District Judge Gerald McHugh.
According to McSwain, the lawsuit is the first in the nation, and may presage the way federal prosecutors and courts will address an issue that is being debated in several cities across the country.
“This is definitely a national issue that the Department of Justice is looking at broadly,” he said at a press conference Wednesday morning, noting that members of the civil department in Washington, D.C., were involved in filing the suit. “We've been in touch with our friends in Washington about how this will affect people throughout the country. It just so happens Philadelphia was poised to be the first city to go forward.”
READ THE COMPLAINT
|Although McHugh's decision is likely to apply just to the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, where the lawsuit was filed, it will undoubtedly have ramifications for other jurisdictions.
The ruling “could be persuasive, or helpful authority to a judge in California, New York, Colorado, Washington State, or wherever this issue might come up,” McSwain said. ”This could be a defining case.”
The defendant, Philadelphia-based nonprofit Safehouse, is being represented by the AIDS Law Project of Pennsylvania and DLA Piper attorney Ilana Eisenstein.
In a statement to the press, Ronda Goldfein, the executive director of the AIDS Law Project, who also sits on the Safehouse board, said she appreciated that the U.S. Attorney's Office had not “taken an aggressive hand” in resolving the issue, and added that the group has “consistently maintained that our disagreement may need to be resolved by the fair and impartial judicial system.”
Eisenstein also said in the statement that the defense ”respectfully disagree with the Department of Justice's view of the 'crack house' statute,” referring to the section of the Controlled Substances Act that the lawsuit focuses on.
“We are committed to defending Safehouse's efforts to provide lifesaving care to those at risk of overdose through the creation of safe injection facilities,” she said.
The lawsuit specifically takes issue with Safehouse's stated plan to operate a “consumption room,” where medical staff would oversee heroin injections.
It is Safehouse's position that the site would help stem the recent increase of opioid-related deaths and reduce the spread of disease, but McSwain said the site clearly violates the law. He dismissed the notion that the law, which makes it illegal to “knowingly open, lease, rent, use, or maintain any place” for the use of controlled substances and has historically been used to prosecute houses were drugs were sold, makes any distinction for doctors, nurses or others who do not sell drugs, but are there to provide medical oversight.
McSwain's position on safe injection sites contrasts with the stated policies of some local law enforcement and leaders, including Mayor Jim Kenney and Philadelphia District Attorney Larry Krasner—both of whom McSwain named during the press conference Wednesday, saying they had “emboldened” Safehouse.
McSwain maintained during the press conference that the lawsuit simply seeks to enforce the law as written.
“If Safehouse wants to operate an injection site, it should work through the democratic process to try to change the law,” he said. “It should not expect prosecutors to turn a blind eye to wholesale illegal behavior and play politics by allowing political ideologies to determine their proprietorial decisions.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSettlement With Kleinbard in Diversity Contracting Tiff Allows Pa. Lawyer to Avoid Sanctions
3 minute read'I Thank You': Attorney Leverages Daily Report Article to Turn $42K Offer Into $600K Settlement
7 minute read'No Evidence'?: Big Law Firms Defend Academic Publishers in EDNY Antitrust Case
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Abbott, Mead Johnson Win Defense Verdict Over Preemie Infant Formula
- 3Guarantees Are Back, Whether Law Firms Want to Talk About Them or Not
- 4Trump Files $10B Suit Against CBS in Amarillo Federal Court
- 5Preparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace AI & Other Technologies
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250