Chief Legal Officer v. General Counsel: Why You May Need Both
The reasons why some corporate law departments opt for both a CLO and GC range from size to industry to attorney retention, in-house legal experts said.
February 07, 2019 at 05:21 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Corporate Counsel
When Larry Weiss joins leading chipmaker company Analog Devices Inc. as vice president, general counsel and secretary on Feb. 11, he will report to Margaret Seif, chief legal and people officer. Yes, the general counsel will report to the chief legal officer.
The legal department at the Norwood, Massachusetts-based business is adopting a not unheard of but still fairly uncommon practice of employing both a CLO and GC.
“Larry will oversee our entire legal group and report to Margaret, who provides oversight for several functions at Analog Devices including legal, HR, and communications,” a company spokesman said of the arrangement.
Indeed, the breakdown of duties between a CLO and GC within departments that have both is generally the same across companies and industries—the CLO is heavily involved in the business, while the GC mans the legal function, in-house legal experts said. But the reasons for adopting such a model vary, they added.
In some cases, “what [the department] is doing is elevating the GC to the C-suite and giving a promotional opportunity to someone on the inside” whom the company is happy with and would like to retain, said John Gilmore, managing partner at BarkerGilmore. “Then the CLO is the person doing the higher-level corporate functions, the higher-value matters for the company, while the GC is there to run the actual day-to-day law department.”
Bestowing the title of GC on several in-house lawyers, all of whom report to one CLO—similar to arrangements where several deputy GCs report to one GC—also helps retention, Gilmore added.
“It makes them feel of value to receive that title,” he said. “They're happy to be able to throw their weight around with that title on their business card.”
Added Susan Hackett, CEO of Legal Executive Leadership, a consultancy for corporate law departments: “Most law departments are reasonably flat—there's not a lot of places for people to go. You may have someone who came in at the associate GC level, and five, 10, 20 years later, they're still there. This is a way to give someone a better title and a promotion.”
Legal departments with both a CLO and GC also generally are seen within large companies with revenue dollars in the billions, said Bob Graff, a partner and recruiter at legal recruiting firm Major, Lindsey & Africa. Last summer, publishing giant Hearst Communications Inc., which reported a revenue of $10.8 billion in 2017, appointed two GCs to replace its former GC, who was promoted to CLO.
Industry also can play a role, added Charles Volkert, executive director of Robert Half Legal. Given all of the issues around data privacy and security, tech companies may be more likely than other businesses to adopt a CLO-GC model. Indeed, both Airbnb Inc. and PayPal have done so in recent years.
Other CLO-GC situations may arise when companies merge, said Graff, who also emphasized that in any legal department where both roles exist, their duties are discrete.
“Unless you're the CLO or the assistant secretary or corporate secretary, you're not dealing with the board, the investors, the proxy issues, the shareholder matters,” he said. “You may have a GC title, but you're not doing any of the corporate governance.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHow Some Elite Law Firms Are Growing Equity Partner Ranks Faster Than Others
4 minute readLSU General Counsel Quits Amid Fracas Over First Amendment Rights of Law Professor
7 minute readLaw Firms Look to Gen Z for AI Skills, as 'Data Becomes the Oil of Legal'
Law Firms Expand Scope of Immigration Expertise Amid Blitz of Trump Orders
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 128 Firms Supporting Retired Barnes & Thornburg Litigator in Georgia Supreme Court Malpractice Case
- 2Boosting Litigation and Employee Benefits Practices, Two Am Law 100 Firms Grow in Pittsburgh
- 3EMT Qualifies as 'Health Care Provider' Under Whistleblower Act, State Appellate Court Rules
- 4Bar Report - Feb. 3
- 5Was $1.3M in 'Incentive' Payments Commission? NJ Justices Weigh Arguments
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250