How American Media Top Lawyer Jon Fine Got the Job
Fine was supposed to work under AMI's former general counsel Cam Stracher, but he ended up becoming Stracher's successor. Now, Fine is dealing with bombshell allegations that he and AMI, the country's largest tabloid publisher and owner of the National Enquirer, attempted to extort Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos.
February 08, 2019 at 01:07 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Corporate Counsel
In November, shortly after he was suddenly replaced as American Media Inc.'s top lawyer, Cameron Stracher spoke with Corporate Counsel about his decision to hire Jon Fine, who ended up becoming Stracher's successor.
Now, Stracher is operating a media and entertainment law practice in New York. And Fine is dealing with bombshell allegations that he and AMI, the country's largest tabloid publisher and owner of the National Enquirer, attempted to extort Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos, the wealthiest person in the world, by threatening to release his private text messages and photos.
Fine did not respond to a request for comment, but AMI issued a statement Friday in which the company asserted that it “believes fervently that it acted lawfully in the reporting of the story of Mr. Bezos.”
“Further, at the time of the recent allegations made by Mr. Bezos, it was in good faith negotiations to resolve all matters with him,” AMI added. “Nonetheless, in light of the nature of the allegations published by Mr. Bezos, the Board has convened and determined that it should promptly and thoroughly investigate the claims. Upon completion of that investigation, the Board will take whatever appropriate action is necessary.”
Fine worked for Amazon from 2008 to 2015, first as an associate general counsel of media and copyright and later as director of author and publishing relations, according to his LinkedIn profile. He was serving as the senior vice president and publisher of Open Road Integrated Media before he joined AMI.
“I did hire Jon Fine,” Stracher said in November.
He declined an interview request Thursday to discuss Bezos' extortion allegations against AMI and Fine. But he explained in the prior interview that Fine was supposed to serve as his deputy general counsel and alleviate some of the pressure that Stracher had been feeling as a result of what he described as a demanding work schedule, one that included attending evening editorial meetings three days a week.
“That's a real burden,” he said. “I couldn't go on vacation. I went to London for a week and I was on the phone the whole time.”
But while Fine was supposed to work under Stracher, he ended up becoming Stracher's successor after Stracher had a public dust-up with AMI chairman and CEO David Pecker, according to a report from the New York Post, which Stracher confirmed. But he declined to talk on the record about his reported clash with Pecker and subsequent departure from AMI, where he'd served as general counsel of media since 2007.
Bezos, who also owns The Washington Post, wrote in a blog post Thursday on Medium titled “No thank you, Mr. Pecker,” that AMI had threatened to publish his personal photos and texts unless he stated publicly that he had “no knowledge or basis for suggesting that AMI's coverage was politically motivated or influenced by political forces.”
Bezos' post also included an email that Fine allegedly sent outlining the details of the proposal to withhold publishing the photos and texts in exchange for Bezos' public statement.
“Of course I don't want personal photos published, but I also won't participate in their well-known practice of blackmail, political favors, political attacks, and corruption,” Bezos wrote. “I prefer to stand up, roll this log over, and see what crawls out.”
In the wake of Bezos' post, investigative reporter Ronan Farrow wrote on Twitter that he “and at least one other prominent journalist involved in breaking stories about the National Enquirer's arrangement with Trump fielded similar 'stop digging or we'll ruin you' blackmail efforts from AMI.'”
He added he “did not engage as I don't cut deals with subjects of ongoing reporting.”
Read More:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllContract Software Unicorn Ironclad Hires Former Pinterest Lawyer as GC
2 minute readFlorida-Based Law Firms Start to Lag, As New York Takes a Bigger Piece of Deals
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250