Undoing Dues, Change is Hard, Strong Assets: The Morning Minute
Here's the news you need to start your day.
February 15, 2019 at 06:00 AM
4 minute read
➤➤ Want to get this daily news briefing by email? Here's the sign-up.
WHAT WE'RE WATCHING
DUES BLUES - Paying bar dues is a drag, and the recent U.S. Supreme Court decision striking down the requirement that nonunion public-sector employees fork over their “fair share” costs for collective bargaining is spurring court challenges to those mandatory fees imposed on lawyers. Marcia Coyle reports that separate challenges are underway in Oregon and there's a pending appeal—revived by the justices—unfolding in the Eighth Circuit involving a challenge from North Dakota. Meanwhile, the president of the Texas state bar is raising questions about mandatory dues.
HMMPH - There's no pleasing some people. Ross Todd reports that proposed changes to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure regarding depositions of corporate representatives have irked both sides of the bar, it seems. The change would require parties to confer on the number of topics covered and the identity of each person an organization designates to testify. Among other things, plaintiffs lawyers don't like the limit on topics, and defense attorneys don't want to be boxed in early in the process on who will speak for the company.
MANAFORT MYSTERY - U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson, who foundthat former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort intentionally lied to the Robert Mueller team after agreeing to cooperate in the investigation of Russian interference in the 2016 election, is expected today to release a transcript of a previously sealed hearing regarding his breach of the plea deal. Jackson on Wednesday said prosecutors are no longer bound to the terms of the agreement and do not need to argue for a reduced prison sentence. Sentencing is set for March 13.
EDITOR'S PICKS
There Isn't Going to be an Elite Transatlantic Law Firm Merger
Mandatory Budgets? At a Law Firm? You Have Got to Be … Thompson Hine
Brexit Sparks Visa Concern Among EU Trainees
Pa. High Court Makes DACA Recipients Eligible for Bar Admission
BIC Sparks Federal Investigation Into Alleged Counterfeit Lighters From China
WHILE YOU WERE SLEEPING
J'ACCUSE! French law firm Fidal is poised to file suit against KPMG after the accounting giant hired 144 of its lawyers, including 26 partners. Rowan Bennett reports that Fidal is expected to sue on the basis of unfair competition, based on either E.U. law that states a firm cannot abuse its majority position in a market or on a French civil liability law that allows companies to make cases for unfair competition.
WHAT YOU SAID
“You don't have a double-digit increase in revenues and profits without having most of your strong assets performing extremely well.”
— JOSEPH LECCESE, CHAIRMAN OF PROSKAUER ROSE, ON THE 2018 PERFORMANCE OF THE LAW FIRM, WHICH REPORTED A NEARLY 10 PERCENT INCREASE IN GROSS REVENUE TO ALMOST $1 BILLION.
➤➤ Sign up here to receive the Morning Minute straight to your inbox.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllJustified Termination Does Not Bar Associate Attorney From Unemployment Benefits, State Appellate Court Rules
5 minute readFlorida Law Schools Are Seeing a Bump in Applications for 2025, After Recent Declines at Flagship Schools
3 minute readFederal Judge Warns of 'Serious Sanctions' on FDIC Over Document Retention
3 minute readHogan Lovells, Jenner & Block Challenge Trump EOs Impacting Gender-Affirming Care
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Recent Controversial Decision and Insurance Law May Mitigate Exposure for Companies Subject to False Claims Act Lawsuits
- 2Visa Revocation and Removal: Can the New Administration Remove Foreign Nationals for Past Advocacy?
- 3Your Communications Are Not Secure! What Legal Professionals Need to Know
- 4Legal Leaders Need To Create A High-Trust Culture
- 5There's a New Chief Judge in Town: Meet the Top Miami Jurist
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250