'So Close and Tender': Plaintiff Seeks Miami Judge's Removal Over Handholding With Opposing Counsel
A Miami condominium association and its president questioned Miami-Dade Circuit Judge William Thomas' impartiality after he chatted, laughed and clasped hands with opposing counsel Mary Barzee Flores in the courtroom, according to court filings.
February 19, 2019 at 02:57 PM
6 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Daily Business Review
A Miami condominium association and its president have asked the Third District Court of Appeal to remove Miami-Dade Circuit Judge William Thomas from five lawsuits disputing maintenance issues with its master association and developer after the judge affectionately placed his hands on opposing counsel Mary Barzee Flores' hands in a bench-side conversation.
Barzee Flores, who served on the Miami-Dade Circuit bench from 2003 to 2011, asked to approach the bench toward the end of a Jan. 17 status conference for a private conversation with Thomas about an unrelated matter. The pair chatted for a few minutes and were laughing and smiling, according to the petitions.
De Soleil South Beach Residential Condominium Association Inc. filed writs of prohibition, along with its president David Ocomo, a defendant in one of the cases.
After Ocomo saw the courtroom exchange between Thomas and Barzee Flores, he became concerned that their relationship was “so close and tender that it appeared familial or one based on a lifelong or extremely personal relationship,” according to the petitions.
The petitions also alleged that Thomas gave Barzee Flores “his rapt attention and respect” throughout the status conference, but “would look down or appear annoyed and even display a tone of hostility” to the other side.
The two had worked together as federal public defenders for the Southern District of Florida, and the condominium association had been concerned about their friendship before Thomas and Barzee Flores held hands, according to the petition.
Before the chat, Thomas had ruled in favor of the master association, — Barzee Flores' client, De Soleil South Beach Beach Association Inc.
On Jan. 28, the condominium association moved to disqualify Thomas, claiming he wasn't impartial. When Thomas denied them, they appealed to the Third DCA.
Counsel to South Beach Resort Development, Richard Jay Sarafan of Genovese Joblove & Battista in Miami, declined to comment on the case,but pointed to his client's response to the petition, branding it “legally insufficient.”
According to their response, Barzee Flores had approached Thomas to tell him about her new job with Florida Agriculture Commissioner Nikki Fried as deputy commissioner for consumer affairs — a job that's since taken her away from her firm and off the case.
Barzee Flores did not respond to a request for comment before deadline. Her former colleagues representing the master association, Jason S. Koslowe, Michael Blid and Kenneth Walton II were unavailable before deadline.
Counsel to the condominium association Jonathan Smulevich said Ocomo was upset by what he saw.
“My client felt it was quite unusual,” Smulevich said. “He was quite emotional about it and said, 'How can this happen in an American courtroom, where judges are basically socializing in open court?' ”
It's about the appearance of impropriety in Smulevich's view, as the conversation wouldn't have been a problem if it happened outside the courtroom, away from litigants.
“ I'm not saying people can't be friends, of course,” Smulevich said. “But there has to be a distinction of when you're outside the courtroom versus when you're inside the courtroom.”
According to Smulevich, litigants and lawyers were still in the courtroom as the status conference only went off the record when Barzee Flores asked to approach.
“It's unusual behavior to happen right after a hearing, for the judges to be laughing in court, touching each other,” Smulevich said. “It's not something clients would want to see.”
Ocomo said Tuesday he was shocked to see how close Thomas and Barzee Flores appeared.
“It took my faith away from the system,” he said. “People are allowed to have friends, but when you're in the court you're supposed to convey fairness.”
Read the petition:
|
'Ridiculous'
Miami lawyer Brian Tannebaum of Bast Amron specializes in ethics and white-collar defense, and regularly gets calls from lawyers asking whether they should petition to remove a judge.
“If I had been asked about filing this motion I would have said, 'Don't file it,' ” Tannebaum said. “ I think it's ridiculous. Particularly because it's after losing a motion, it just kind of shows what the basis of the motion really is. 'We lost, we're upset, we want to raise this issue.' ”
It's not unusual for judges and lawyers to be friends, said Tannebaum, who stressed that it's a judge's job to ensure that doesn't affect their rulings on a case.
“ I'm friends with judges and they do me no favors when it comes to being in court,” Tannebaum said. “I've been before judges who have said, 'I'm very good friends with Mr. Tannebaum, we have a history together. Do you have an issue with that?' And I can't remember a time that a lawyer has said, 'Yes.' ”
Tannebaum worked with Thomas as a state public defender and said he's known as being “ straight down the middle when it comes to fairness.”
If a judge can't be impartial, they're expected to recuse themselves — like one judge did when Tannebaum, his former judicial campaign manager, appeared before him.
It's a balancing act, according to Jan Jacobowitz, legal ethics expert and law professor at the University of Miami.
“Even the appearance of impropriety is against the judicial canons,” Jacobowitz said. “And it's hard to know without being there, but we have to rely on our judges to know whether they can rule impartially or not. Miami has a very close-knit legal community, so there's a lot of overlapping relationships and people have to act professionally.”
Related stories:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDemocrats Give Up Circuit Court Picks for Trial Judges in Reported Deal With GOP
Amir Ali, MacArthur Justice Center Director, Confirmed to DC District Court
US Magistrate Judge Embry Kidd Confirmed to 11th Circuit
5th Circuit Judge Jones Slams Proposal for Greater Amicus Brief Funding Disclosure
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250