Critical Mass: New Litigation Funding Bill May Not Have Bright Future. Plus: Top Settlements of 2018
Lawyers say GOP senators' efforts to reboot the measure will likely get a cold shoulder from the Democratic-controlled House
February 20, 2019 at 01:37 PM
5 minute read
Welcome to Critical Mass, Law.com's weekly digest for class action and mass tort attorneys. This week: What are people saying about the new litigation financing bill? Four 2018 settlements joined ISS Securities Class Action Services' Top 100 List. Lawyers are making a lot of noise over 3M earplugs.
Send your feedback to [email protected], or find me on Twitter: @abronstadlaw.
New Lit Funding Bill: Dead on Arrival?
Republican Senators reintroduced a bill last week that would require plaintiffs' attorneys to disclose litigation financing arrangements in class actions and multidistrict litigation. My colleague Ross Todd wrote this story about the Litigation Funding Transparency Act, introduced by U.S. Sens. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, John Cornyn, R-Texas, Thom Tillis, R-North Carolina, and Ben Sasse, R-Nebraska. It looks a lot like last year's bill, which I wrote about. Here's what people are saying:
>Michael German, Vannin Capital: “The proposed act is another example of special interest groups using their reach in Washington to implement legislation that goes well beyond the issue they purport to address.”
>Travis Lenkner, Keller Lenkner: “This is a carbon copy of the Chamber's unsuccessful bill from the last Congress, which didn't even get a hearing. 'Transparency' is Chamber-speak for a one-sided fishing expedition into a litigant's resources.”
>Anthony Sebok, Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law at Yeshiva University: “The Democrats are in control of the House of Representatives, so it raises a question of, what is the strategy going forward from the U.S. Chamber of Commerce? Is it that they think they can get allies from people on the Democrats' side? And, if they can, that will be an interesting development and represent an interesting twist in the narrative so far.”
Top Securities Settlements of 2018
Four securities class action settlements from 2018 joined a Top 100 all-time listcompiled by ISS Securities Class Action Services. The report found there were 126 securities class action settlements, down from 163 in 2017, but they totaled $5.84 billion, up 164%. That's in line with a NERA Economic Consulting report earlier this year that found securities class action settlements swelled in 2018.
The four settlements in 2018 that made the Top 100 were:
No. 5: $3 billion with Brazilian energy firm Petrobras. Lead plaintiffs' counsel was Pomerantz.
No. 31: $480 million over Wells Fargo's fake account scandal. Bernstein Litowitzwas lead counsel.
No. 68: $250 million with Allergan. Bernstein Litowitz and Kessler Topaz were co-lead counsel.
No. 80: $210 million with Wilmington Trust Corp. Bernstein Litowitz and Saxena White were co-lead counsel.
3M Earplugs Targeted by Military Members
Plaintiffs' lawyers are gearing up to file thousands of lawsuits over allegedly defective earplugs issued to U.S. military members in the past decade. So far, more than 200 lawsuits allege 3M's dual-ended Combat Arms Earplugs, used in both training and combat, caused hearing loss and ringing in the ears.
The U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation plans to hear those cases (pun intended) on March 28 in Washington D.C. On Tuesday: 3M (represented by Kimberly Branscome of Kirkland & Ellis) filed court papers supporting an MDL in Minnesota, where it's headquartered — or, as a “neutral” alternative, the Middle District of Tennessee. It called some of the venues requested by plaintiffs inappropriate “forum shopping” because they were located near military bases or had judges with military experience.
|
Who Got the Work?
A federal judge in Illinois named Cohen Milstein and Levi Korsinsky to lead the shareholder litigation against MoneyGram International. Back on Nov. 8, MoneyGram agreed to pay $125 million to resolve allegations that it failed to crack down on fraudulent money transfers, as required under a 2009 order with the Federal Trade Commission and a 2012 deferred prosecution agreement with the Justice Department. On Feb. 12, U.S. District Judge Joan Lefkow appointed the competing plaintiffs' firms in the securities class actions that followed those announcements.
Here's more you need to know:
Whole Enchilada: Whole Foods has asked the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit to be the first appellate court to rule on whether Bristol-Myers Squibb v. Superior Court of California applied to class actions – what it called a “novel issue of constitutional due process.” This month, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the Washington Legal Foundation weighed in as amici on the side of Whole Foods, which argued that a class action over an employee incentive program could be truncated under the 2017 decision by the U.S. Supreme Court. Bristol-Myers limited personal jurisdiction in a mass tort action involving several individual plaintiffs, but didn't address its impact on class actions.
Alsup Addendum: The 9th Circuit has asked U.S. District Judge William Alsup to explain why he refused to allow lawyers to settle a class action over Logitechcomputer speakers. Alsup, who is in San Francisco, has a strict class action standing order that prohibits settlement of classes that aren't certified. Logitech had petitioned to overturn two of Alsup's orders, which the 9th Circuit has stayed.
Rollover Verdict: An Alabama jury awarded $151 million to a 24-year-old man who was paralyzed after the 1998 Ford Explorer he was riding in rolled over. Ford plans to appeal the verdict, which also was against the driver, who had swerved to avoid an animal. Representing the plaintiff, Travaris “Tre” Smith, were: LaBarron Boone, Greg Allen, Kendall Dunson, and Dan Philyaw (Beasley Allen) and Bill Gamble(Gamble Gamble Calame and Jones). Ford's team was Alan Thomas and Jennifer Egbe (Huie Fernambucq & Stewart), and Milton C. Davis.
Thanks for reading, we'll be back next week!
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1'Largest Retail Data Breach in History'? Hot Topic and Affiliated Brands Sued for Alleged Failure to Prevent Data Breach Linked to Snowflake Software
- 2Former President of New York State Bar, and the New York Bar Foundation, Dies As He Entered 70th Year as Attorney
- 3Legal Advocates in Uproar Upon Release of Footage Showing CO's Beat Black Inmate Before His Death
- 4Longtime Baker & Hostetler Partner, Former White House Counsel David Rivkin Dies at 68
- 5Court System Seeks Public Comment on E-Filing for Annual Report
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250