How I Made Partner: Quarles & Brady's Eric Matzke
"Discomfort drives growth. Leave the comfort zone of your own practice and your own experience, and get to know your colleagues and partners, and what makes them special."
February 20, 2019 at 03:58 PM
4 minute read
Practice area: Product liability.
Law school: Marquette University Law School, 2010
How long have you been at the firm? Nine years.
How long were you an associate at the firm? Seven years.
Were you an associate at another firm before joining your present firm? I joined Quarles & Brady as an associate after graduating from law school.
What year did you make partner at your current firm? 2017.
What's the biggest surprise you experienced in becoming partner? I was surprised, and thankful, that several of my clients reached out to congratulate me.
What do you think was the deciding point for the firm in making you partner? I adopted an early partner mentality where I focused not only on growing my skill set as a product liability lawyer, but also on developing new business for the firm in other areas. In particular, I devoted significant time as an associate to building relationships with my colleagues across practice groups to learn how their skill sets and expertise may help me cross-sell their talents to clients. Building these relationships also allowed me to identify new client prospects where our firm was uniquely positioned to help, which generated additional business for the firm outside of my individual practice, and positioned me for early partnership.
Describe how you feel now about your career now that you've made partner.
I feel fortunate to work with clients who view me as a trusted advisor, both in litigation and on various matters that directly affect the trajectory of their business. I also feel fortunate to partner with so many dynamic, talented attorneys at Quarles & Brady who share the same passion for relentlessly defending our clients' interests. They challenge me every day to be a better partner, attorney, and member of the community, and I love it.
What's the key to successful business development in your opinion? Understanding what makes you, your partners, and your firm unique. By building relationships with partners across practices and offices, I was able to identify opportunities where our firm could help clients that may not have had a current need for my product liability representation, but where I have a direct relationship and have earned the clients' trust. Engaging in team building across offices and practices is the best tool to understand your partners' expertise and identify these cross-selling opportunities.
What's been the biggest change, day-to-day, in your routine since becoming partner? The biggest and best change is that I spend more time communicating with clients and prospective clients. The more information I can gather from clients or prospective clients about their needs, goals and what makes them unique, the better prepared I am to assemble a proposal and team that is custom tailored to serve the clients' interests in an efficient, inclusive, and effective manner.
Who had the greatest influence in your career that helped propel you to partner? My father, Wayne Matzke, who was the CEO of a food manufacturing business, had the greatest influence on my career and partnership. He taught me that a career can be influenced by many things you cannot control, but a successful career features two things that you can: an unfailing respect for individuals at every level and a relentless work ethic to be the best at your craft. I found this guidance to be spot-on in my efforts to become a partner at Quarles & Brady, and consistent with the values and culture embodied by the firm as a whole.
What's the best piece of advice you could give an associate who wants to make partner Discomfort drives growth. Leave the comfort zone of your own practice and your own experience, and get to know your colleagues and partners, and what makes them special. Broadening your perspective will allow you to grow as an attorney and learn more about your clients as a whole, while simultaneously allowing you to identify new client opportunities.
Got a suggestion for a partner to profile in this column? Email [email protected].
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllThe Path in the Multiverse: Rethinking Client Engagement Through Gamification
6 minute readFrom ‘Deep Sadness’ to Little Concern, Gaetz’s Nomination Draws Sharp Reaction From Lawyers
7 minute read‘What’s Up With Morgan & Morgan?’ Law, Advertising and a Calculated Rise
10 minute readChicago Midsize Firm Will Combine With Miami Boutique To Form Antitrust Powerhouse
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1New Associates Yearbook 2024
- 2Disbarred Attorney Alleges ADA Violations in Lawsuit Against Miami-Dade Judges
- 3Free Speech Causes a Neighborly Feud
- 4Read the Document: 'Google Must Divest Chrome,' DOJ Says, Proposing Remedies in Search Monopoly Case
- 5Voir Dire Voyeur: I Find Out What Kind of Juror I’d Be
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250