How I Made Partner: Quarles & Brady's Eric Matzke
"Discomfort drives growth. Leave the comfort zone of your own practice and your own experience, and get to know your colleagues and partners, and what makes them special."
February 20, 2019 at 03:58 PM
4 minute read
Eric Matzke, 34, Quarles & Brady
Office: Milwaukee.
Practice area: Product liability.
Law school: Marquette University Law School, 2010
How long have you been at the firm? Nine years.
How long were you an associate at the firm? Seven years.
Were you an associate at another firm before joining your present firm? I joined Quarles & Brady as an associate after graduating from law school.
What year did you make partner at your current firm? 2017.
What's the biggest surprise you experienced in becoming partner? I was surprised, and thankful, that several of my clients reached out to congratulate me.
What do you think was the deciding point for the firm in making you partner? I adopted an early partner mentality where I focused not only on growing my skill set as a product liability lawyer, but also on developing new business for the firm in other areas. In particular, I devoted significant time as an associate to building relationships with my colleagues across practice groups to learn how their skill sets and expertise may help me cross-sell their talents to clients. Building these relationships also allowed me to identify new client prospects where our firm was uniquely positioned to help, which generated additional business for the firm outside of my individual practice, and positioned me for early partnership.
Describe how you feel now about your career now that you've made partner.
I feel fortunate to work with clients who view me as a trusted advisor, both in litigation and on various matters that directly affect the trajectory of their business. I also feel fortunate to partner with so many dynamic, talented attorneys at Quarles & Brady who share the same passion for relentlessly defending our clients' interests. They challenge me every day to be a better partner, attorney, and member of the community, and I love it.
What's the key to successful business development in your opinion? Understanding what makes you, your partners, and your firm unique. By building relationships with partners across practices and offices, I was able to identify opportunities where our firm could help clients that may not have had a current need for my product liability representation, but where I have a direct relationship and have earned the clients' trust. Engaging in team building across offices and practices is the best tool to understand your partners' expertise and identify these cross-selling opportunities.
What's been the biggest change, day-to-day, in your routine since becoming partner? The biggest and best change is that I spend more time communicating with clients and prospective clients. The more information I can gather from clients or prospective clients about their needs, goals and what makes them unique, the better prepared I am to assemble a proposal and team that is custom tailored to serve the clients' interests in an efficient, inclusive, and effective manner.
Who had the greatest influence in your career that helped propel you to partner? My father, Wayne Matzke, who was the CEO of a food manufacturing business, had the greatest influence on my career and partnership. He taught me that a career can be influenced by many things you cannot control, but a successful career features two things that you can: an unfailing respect for individuals at every level and a relentless work ethic to be the best at your craft. I found this guidance to be spot-on in my efforts to become a partner at Quarles & Brady, and consistent with the values and culture embodied by the firm as a whole.
What's the best piece of advice you could give an associate who wants to make partner Discomfort drives growth. Leave the comfort zone of your own practice and your own experience, and get to know your colleagues and partners, and what makes them special. Broadening your perspective will allow you to grow as an attorney and learn more about your clients as a whole, while simultaneously allowing you to identify new client opportunities.
Got a suggestion for a partner to profile in this column? Email [email protected].
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllEighth Circuit Determines No Standing for Website User Concerned With Privacy Who Challenged Session-Replay Technology
7 minute readThe Time Is Now for Employers to Assess Risk of Employees’ Use of DeepSeek
4 minute readFired by Trump, EEOC's First Blind GC Lands at Nonprofit Targeting Abuses of Power
3 minute readHouston Law Firm Files $250K Breach of Contract Suit Against 2 Former Lawyers
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Public Notices/Calendars
- 2Wednesday Newspaper
- 3Decision of the Day: Qui Tam Relators Do Not Plausibly Claim Firm Avoided Tax Obligations Through Visa Applications, Circuit Finds
- 4Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-116
- 5Big Law Firms Sheppard Mullin, Morgan Lewis and Baker Botts Add Partners in Houston
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250