How Elevate's General Counsel Convinced Founder to Look Inward and Cut Outside Legal Costs
“When I was under the gun, I found myself leaning toward saying, 'Let's suck this up and use this [outside firm] again,'” said Elevate founder and executive chairman Liam Brown. He said Elevate's general counsel, Steve Harmon, gave him the nudge he needed to use Elevate's software to unbundle legal work in a high-pressure M&A and close the deal on time and under budget.
February 22, 2019 at 01:55 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Corporate Counsel
As founder and executive chairman of Los Angeles-based legal services and technology company Elevate Services Inc., Liam Brown is in the business of helping legal departments leverage tech to streamline transactions and reduce costs.
Yet when Brown was faced with ballooning invoices from outside counsel and a high-pressure 30-day deadline to close Elevate's acquisition of Yerra Solutions earlier this year, his knee-jerk reaction was to turn back to outside counsel for help.
“When I was under the gun, I found myself leaning toward saying, 'Let's suck this up and use this [outside firm] again,'” Brown said.
But Elevate's new general counsel, Steve Harmon, who joined the company in late 2018 while Elevate was in the midst of acquiring several rival and related businesses, convinced Brown to look inward. And in doing so he helped Elevate slash outside legal costs in the Yerra acquisition from an estimated $400,000 to $60,000, according to Brown and Harmon.
“This is the classic example of eating my own dog food. You test your own products on yourself,” Harmon said. “Coming from Cisco, where we've taken this approach internally, I brought those best practices to Elevate.”
Harmon, who also serves as vice president and deputy general counsel of legal at Cisco Systems Inc., where he's worked since 2000, had relied on Elevate's software to streamline deals and cut costs for Cisco. And now Harmon found himself giving Brown a nudge to do the same.
Brown was receptive, in part, because he had been frustrated with outside counsel expenses that routinely exceeded his budget, saying, for instance, that he was getting invoices that were supposed to be fixed at $250,000 but had snowballed to $400,000.
“It makes me look like I'm not able to manage a budget,” Brown said. “The last thing I need is to look stupid.”
He added he'd brought his concerns to a partner at one of the outside firms in question, but the partner was primarily interested in whether Brown was satisfied with the legal work—not about going over budget.
“The legal work was great,” Brown said, adding the partner had missed his point. “They [outside counsel] don't work in a systemized way so they don't keep control of their costs.”
And when Harmon approached Brown and questioned why Elevate kept turning to outside counsel for M&A deals instead of unbundling the legal work using Elevate software, that was enough to convince Brown to try something different.
“The fact that he [Harmon] had the confidence to say this is what we should do really made the difference,” Brown said.
By using software for project management, due diligence and Elevate's staffing service for hiring lawyers and legal professionals on an as-needed basis to handle, for instance, document review and other less complex tasks, the company closed the Yerra acquisition on time and under budget, according to Harmon and Brown.
“M&A is a very good application for this [hiring service] in that most organizations can't afford to keep a large group of legal professionals on staff just because they happen to do a M&A deal,” Harmon said.
“Our example here should provide confidence to people about the role that law companies play,” he added. “Whether customers use Elevate or one of the other law companies out there or decides to build this in-house, it's a strategic decision they'll have to make.”
Read More:
Elevate Taps Cisco Legal Ops Trailblazer Steve Harmon as GC
Experts Disagree on Who Leads the Way on Legal Tech—Law Firms or In-House Counsel
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All‘The US Market Is Critical’: KPMG’s Former Head of Global Legal Services On the Big Four Firm’s Legal Arm Entering the US
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Five Years After Vega Much Remains Unsettled in Pay Frequency Litigation
- 2DLA Piper Hires Former FAA Chief Counsel as Transportation Practice Co-Chair
- 3Firms Come Out of the Gate With High-Profile Litigation Hires in 2025
- 4Legal Departments, Firms Expect Gen AI to Boost ALSP Usage
- 5Law Firms Are 'Struggling' With Partner Pay Segmentation, as Top Rainmakers Bring In More Revenue
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250