Khan Academy's Free, Online LSAT Prep Proves Popular With Test Takers
The Law School Admission Council and Khan Academy say their nine-month-old free online LSAT prep program is getting heavy use among minority groups that are underrepresented in law schools and the legal profession.
February 27, 2019 at 01:22 PM
4 minute read
It turns out you can't beat free.
More than 40,000 people each month are using Khan Academy's new free, online Law School Admission Test prep program, according to figures released Wednesday by the Law School Admission Council and Khan Academy. That's a healthy chunk of the roughly 100,000 people who sit for the entrance exam annually.
The council and Khan Academy jointly launched the program in June with a goal of making LSAT test prep more affordable and reaching a wider array of prospective law students. The groups say the early results indicate the program is hitting those targets.
As survey of those who took the LSAT for the first time in November revealed that more than half of African-American test takers—52 percent—reported using the Khan Academy prep program. Among Hispanics, 41 used the program. And 38 percent of Asians used the program to prepare, as did 46 percent of women. Forty-seven percent of Puerto Rican LSAT takers also used Khan Academy.
Among white test takers, 43 percent studied on Khan Academy. That figure was 41 percent for men.
“Our long-standing commitment to equity motivated us to help level the playing field by creating wide access to a top-notch program that develops the critical thinking skills required for success in law school and a wide range of careers,” said council president Kellye Testy. “We are excited that so many students are taking advantage of the free tools that LSAC and Khan Academy are offering together. Increasing opportunity for all students will, over time, ensure that our legal system truly reflects the diverse needs of society.”
Traditional LSAT programs can cost anywhere from several hundred dollars to $2,000 or more, meaning they are out of reach for some test takers. The program has proven popular with LSAT takers who have educational debt from their undergraduate degrees. Among those who took the LSAT for the first time between June and November, 37 percent of those with debt under $39,999 used the Khan Academy prep program. That figure increased to 41 percent among those with $40,000 or more in debt.
“When you decrease barriers to education and increase access to free resources and tools, all students can really thrive,” Khan Academy founder Sal Khan. He started Khan Academy in 2006 after tutoring a cousin over the internet. The venture has since grown into a juggernaut of free online education. More than 3 million people have used Khan Academy's free SAT prep program.
But the free Khan Academy program hasn't upended the traditional LSAT test prep industry, said Dave Killoran, chief executive officer of PowerScore, which offers both live and online LSAT prep classes. In fact, the availability of free LSAT questions through Khan Academy actually may be driving more people to seek further assistance, he said. PowerScore, for instance, has sold more LSAT prep books since the Khan Academy program debuted than it did the previous year, he said.
“We're seeing a lot of student using Khan Academy not as their main form of preparation, but as a supplement,” Killoran said. “I think you're seeing the natural student migration toward, 'If I can get it for free, I'll use it.' We've been telling people it's a great resource in terms of actually doing questions.”
Killoran said the program appears to be meeting the diversity and accessibility goals that the council and Khan Academy set forth, which is a good thing.
“What I really like about it is the numbers they published about the groups that are accessing the Khan Academy resources,” he said. “In my view, the more people who start preparing for the LSAT and take it seriously, the better off it is for everybody in this space. Previously, too many people would look at a few questions and take the test. It's just too difficult of an exam to do that.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Everything From A to Z': University GCs Tested by Legal, Financial, Societal Challenges
6 minute read'A Horrible Reputation for Bad Verdicts': Plaintiffs Attorney Breaks Down $129M Wrongful-Death Verdict From Conservative Venue
How Uncertainty in College Athletics Compensation Could Drive Lawsuits in 2025
'Basic Arithmetic': Court Rules in Favor of LA Charter School Denied Funding by California Education Department
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250