After Bumpy Starts, Two More Law Schools Win Full ABA Approval
Both Lincoln Memorial University Duncan School of Law and Concordia University School of Law overcame early challenges to secure full accreditation from the American Bar Association, leaving just one provisionally accredited law school in the country.
March 04, 2019 at 02:26 PM
4 minute read
|
Add Concordia University School of Law and Lincoln Memorial University Duncan School of Law to the list of law school fully accredited by the American Bar Association.
Both campuses ran into early accreditation problems and scrambled to ensure their first graduates could sit for the bar exam. But each overcome those challenges to win the ABA's full blessing in late February. Lincoln Memorial is located in Knoxville, while Concordia is in Boise, Idaho.
Lincoln Memorial Law dean Gary Wade acknowledged the school's rocky path to accreditation in a March 1 statement announcing its fully accredited status.
“This is a day of celebration for Lincoln Memorial University and especially for the Duncan School of Law,” said Wade, who is a former Tennessee Supreme Court Justice. “Over the last 10 years, our school has managed to hit a few potholes along the path to full approval by the American Bar Association, so success is all the sweeter.”
Concordia law dean Elena Langan called full approval “terrific news” for the school. “We have been working diligently toward this goal for several years and earning full accreditation by the ABA underscores our deep commitment to providing quality legal education and graduating students who not only become excellent attorneys, but leaders in their communities,” she said.
Both schools will be subject to a site visit by the ABA within three years, then will go on the 10-year reaccreditation site-visit schedule for fully accredited campuses, according to Barry Currier, the ABA's managing director for accreditation and legal education. With those approvals, the University of North Texas Dallas College of Law remains the only provisionally accredited school in the nation—a byproduct of the fact that no new law schools have opened recently amid legal education's downturn, Currier said. Five ABA-accredited schools have closed since 2017 or soon will close.
It took Lincoln Memorial, which opened in 2009, seven years to obtain full accreditation. The Tennessee Board of Law Examiners allowed the school's first graduates to take the state bar exam on the condition the campus get provisional ABA accreditation by 2012. But the ABA denied the school's application for provisional accreditation in late 2011 for what school administrators said were problems with admissions and academic support.
Lincoln Memorial responded by suing the ABA in federal court, claiming it “arbitrarily and capriciously denied” the school accreditation. A judge ruled against the school and it dropped the suit in October of 2012. Meanwhile, the state law examiners in 2012 extended the ability of graduates to take the local bar through 2017. But the school obtained provisional accreditation from the ABA in 2014, which allowed graduates to sit for the bar in the jurisdiction of their choosing.
Lincoln Memorial's run-ins with the ABA didn't end then, however. The ABA found the school out of compliance with its admissions standards in the spring of 2018, but determined it was back in compliance in November.
Concordia's road to full ABA accreditation also included various turns, though it never led into court. The law school opened in 2012 as part of the Portland Oregon-based Concordia University. The ABA's Council of the Section of Legal Education delayed a decision on the school's application for provisional approval in 2014 in order to allow a fact finder to visit the campus. That delay created uncertainty for the school's first class of graduates about whether they would be able to take the bar exam. The school had earlier asked the Idaho Supreme Court to step in to allow students to take the state bar exam, but the court refused. In the end, the school received provisional ABA accreditation in June 2015, which allowed the inaugural class to take the bar exam the following month.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Transforming Children Into ATMs'?: Roblox, Epic Games Sued for Allegedly Fueling Addictive Behavior in Minors
10th Circuit Raises 6th Amendment Bar for Prosecutors' Attorney-Client Violations
Judges Push for Action to Combat Increasing Threats Against Judiciary
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Contested Engineer Cleared to Testify in Defective Pistol Suit, Federal Judge Rules
- 2How I Made Partner: 'Don’t Be Scared to Be Ambitious,' Says Aya Eguchi of Morrison Foerster
- 3People in the News—Dec. 18, 2024—Faegre Drinker, Antheil Maslow
- 4'We've Got a Good Thing Here in Delaware': Glasscock Reflects on Rewards of Equity Work, Clerks and the Delaware Way
- 5My Second Year of Practice in Review
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250