New Jersey Leads Challenge to DOL's Rollback of Workplace Injury Reporting
The lawsuit by New Jersey, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota and New York says the Department of Labor acted in an arbitrary and capricious manner in ending the reporting rule.
March 06, 2019 at 04:04 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on New Jersey Law Journal
The rollback of rules at the U.S. Department of Labor requiring large employers to report workplace injuries and illnesses has drawn a challenge from attorneys general in six states.
The action by New Jersey, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota and New York says the Department of Labor acted in an arbitrary and capricious manner on Jan. 25 when it rolled back a 2016 rule governing reporting of injuries.
That rule, which requires large employers to submit information annually from three different workplace injury and illness tracking forms that employers were already required to maintain, was intended to help the Occupational Safety and Health Administration and employers identify safety hazards and encourage their abatement. But three years later, OSHA reversed course, claiming that the rule provided little benefit and undermined workers' privacy, according to the state's lawsuit, filed Wednesday in U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia.
In making the change, the Department of Labor violated the Administrative Procedures Act by failing to provide the significant justification that the act demands, including showing there are good reasons for the new policy, the suit argues. That burden is especially important where a new policy rests on factual findings that contradict those which underlay its prior policy, according to the suit. The states seek declaratory and injunctive relief vacating the 2019 final rule and preventing its implementation.
Before the 2016 rule change, employers were required to keep records of workplace injuries on three forms: Form 300, which provides basic information about each incident and its outcome; Form 300A, which provides a summary of the number, types and outcomes of all injuries; and Form 301, which provides a more detailed account of each injury and how it occurred, as well as information about the employer's line of business. Employers were required to keep completed forms on file and to make them available to federal or state inspectors on request.
The 2016 rule change required companies with 250 or more employees to annually submit information from the three forms to the Department of Labor, which intended to make the information available online after removal of personally identifiable information.
The suit names the Department of Labor, OSHA, Labor Secretary R. Alexander Acosta and acting Assistant Secretary of Labor for OSHA Loren Sweatt as defendants. New Jersey is the lead agency on the plaintiff side of the suit.
“By making public reports of workplace injuries and illnesses harder to access, the Trump Administration is jeopardizing the health, safety, and wellness of our workers,” New York Attorney General Letitia James said in a statement. “Simply put: we cannot properly tackle workplace safety issues if we do not know about them.”
“Public reporting of workplace safety information helps states enforce our labor laws, forces employers to remove hazards, and empowers workers to demand improvements,” New Jersey Attorney General Gurbir Grewal said in a statement. “Workers deserve that transparency, and the federal government should not be trying to take it away.”
The suit by the state attorneys general follows a similar challenge to the rollback of reporting requirements that was filed in January by Public Citizen and two public health organizations.
A media contact at the Department of Labor did not respond to a request for comment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Health Care Behemoth'?: DOJ Seeks Injunction Blocking $3.3B UnitedHealth Merger Proposal
3 minute readThe Coming of Trump's Judicial Picks Spurs Liberals to Press for Biden's
USPTO Director Kathi Vidal Announces Resignation Ahead of Administration Change
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Rule 126(b) Citations to Unpublished Opinions: Some of Us Still Don’t Get It
- 2The Limits of the ‘Hot Potato’ Doctrine
- 35th Circuit Judge Jones Slams Proposal for Greater Amicus Brief Funding Disclosure
- 4Wilson Sonsini Promotes 16 Lawyers to Partner
- 5Norton Rose Lawyers Accused of Accessing Confidential Emails and Documents in Internal Probe
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250