New Jersey Leads Challenge to DOL's Rollback of Workplace Injury Reporting
The lawsuit by New Jersey, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota and New York says the Department of Labor acted in an arbitrary and capricious manner in ending the reporting rule.
March 06, 2019 at 04:04 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on New Jersey Law Journal
The rollback of rules at the U.S. Department of Labor requiring large employers to report workplace injuries and illnesses has drawn a challenge from attorneys general in six states.
The action by New Jersey, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota and New York says the Department of Labor acted in an arbitrary and capricious manner on Jan. 25 when it rolled back a 2016 rule governing reporting of injuries.
That rule, which requires large employers to submit information annually from three different workplace injury and illness tracking forms that employers were already required to maintain, was intended to help the Occupational Safety and Health Administration and employers identify safety hazards and encourage their abatement. But three years later, OSHA reversed course, claiming that the rule provided little benefit and undermined workers' privacy, according to the state's lawsuit, filed Wednesday in U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia.
In making the change, the Department of Labor violated the Administrative Procedures Act by failing to provide the significant justification that the act demands, including showing there are good reasons for the new policy, the suit argues. That burden is especially important where a new policy rests on factual findings that contradict those which underlay its prior policy, according to the suit. The states seek declaratory and injunctive relief vacating the 2019 final rule and preventing its implementation.
Before the 2016 rule change, employers were required to keep records of workplace injuries on three forms: Form 300, which provides basic information about each incident and its outcome; Form 300A, which provides a summary of the number, types and outcomes of all injuries; and Form 301, which provides a more detailed account of each injury and how it occurred, as well as information about the employer's line of business. Employers were required to keep completed forms on file and to make them available to federal or state inspectors on request.
The 2016 rule change required companies with 250 or more employees to annually submit information from the three forms to the Department of Labor, which intended to make the information available online after removal of personally identifiable information.
The suit names the Department of Labor, OSHA, Labor Secretary R. Alexander Acosta and acting Assistant Secretary of Labor for OSHA Loren Sweatt as defendants. New Jersey is the lead agency on the plaintiff side of the suit.
“By making public reports of workplace injuries and illnesses harder to access, the Trump Administration is jeopardizing the health, safety, and wellness of our workers,” New York Attorney General Letitia James said in a statement. “Simply put: we cannot properly tackle workplace safety issues if we do not know about them.”
“Public reporting of workplace safety information helps states enforce our labor laws, forces employers to remove hazards, and empowers workers to demand improvements,” New Jersey Attorney General Gurbir Grewal said in a statement. “Workers deserve that transparency, and the federal government should not be trying to take it away.”
The suit by the state attorneys general follows a similar challenge to the rollback of reporting requirements that was filed in January by Public Citizen and two public health organizations.
A media contact at the Department of Labor did not respond to a request for comment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllApple Files Appeal to DC Circuit Aiming to Intervene in Google Search Monopoly Case
3 minute readDOT Moves to Roll Back Emissions Rules, Eliminate DEI Programs
Attorneys Leading $10M Pension Settlement Against CITGO Score $4M Payday
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1The Lawyers Waging the Legal Fight Against the Trump Administration
- 2McDermott's Onetime London Leader Headed to Pillsbury
- 3A&O Shearman To Lose Another Five Lawyers to EY
- 4Pearl Cohen Enters San Francisco Market Via Combination With IP Boutique
- 5'Incredibly Complicated'? Antitrust Litigators Identify Pros and Cons of Proposed One Agency Act
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250