State Lawmakers Consider Raising Civil Filing Fee to Fund Law School
The State Bar of North Dakota has proposed upping the fee to file a civil lawsuit from $80 to $180 with the additional funds going to the University of North Dakota School of Law, to help alleviate earlier budget cuts.
March 06, 2019 at 12:58 PM
4 minute read
The State Bar Association of North Dakota has proposed a novel way to fund the state's financially struggling law school: Hike up the fee to file a civil lawsuit and funnel the additional money to the campus.
Bar association president Zachary Pelham said in an interview Wednesday that the proposal was not based on law school funding models elsewhere, though he later learned that Arkansas uses a portion of court filing fees for its public law schools. (Barry Currier, the American Bar Association's managing director for accreditation and legal education said he doesn't know if any other states fund their law schools in this manner since the ABA does not track that.)
Pelham testified before North Dakota's Senate Appropriations Committee on Tuesday in support of amending the state judiciary budget to raise the civil lawsuit filing fee from the current $80 to $180, with the additional $100 going toward the law school. That change would provide nearly $4.8 million every two years for the school, the state bar estimated.
“The law school needs attention,” said Pelham, himself a UND law graduate. “This idea provides a sustainable, long-term income source for use specifically by the law school. In recent years, the cuts made by the university administration to the law school have had a significant impact on the quality of legal education, in my opinion.”
Pelham could not provide figures for the amount of recent cuts to the law school's budget, and the school's incoming dean did not respond to a request for those numbers. But according to a recent article in the Grand Forks Herald about an effort by the North Dakota State Board of Higher Education to increase funding to the law school, the campus has sustained a 12 percent decrease in state funding from 2017 to 2018. Meanwhile, operating expenses have increased. Revenue generated by tuition has also decreased.
Pelham said the school's budget shortfall is manifesting in low faculty and staff morale, fewer faculty positions and challenges in recruiting high-quality students and faculty.
The law school's budget challenges and lack of funding for tenure-track positions were a primary factor in the school's recent failed dean search, according to the bar association. UND announced last month that current professor Michael McGinniss will be the next dean, after two external candidates were offered the position but declined it.
Pelham testified that the state's current $80 civil filing fee is unusually low. Neighboring Minnesota charges minimum of $295 for such suits, and Montana to the west recently upped its civil filing fee from $90 to $170, the bar association reported. The civil filing fee in federal court is $400.
North Dakota already earmarks portions of the existing $80 filing fee for civil legal service for low-income clients as well as a “displaced homemaker” fund.
The Grand Forks law school produces a large portion of the state's practicing bar, thus it is essential for the school to provide a high-quality education, Pelham said, adding that state lawmakers appeared receptive to the proposal.
“The legislators talking to me after I presented testimony have indicated an interest in some form of potential filing increase, whether it's the full amount we proposed, or something in between, to specifically provide funding to North Dakota's only law school,” he said. “What form that takes in the end, I can't say. But I think this is a good idea.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllStatute of Limitations Shrivels $5M Jury Award to Less than $1M, 8th Circuit Rules
4 minute readRead the Document: DOJ Releases Ex-Special Counsel's Report Explaining Trump Prosecutions
3 minute readArizona Board Gives Thumbs Up to KPMG's Bid To Deliver Legal Services
Goodwin to Launch Brussels Office With Quinn Emanuel Antitrust Partner
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250