Trump Watch: A Look Inside Judge T.S. Ellis' Courtroom During Manafort's Sentencing
The courtroom was packed, as spectators and reporters alike formed a queue outside. One juror from Manafort's trial even attended the spectacle.
March 08, 2019 at 10:42 AM
5 minute read
Welcome back to Trump Watch. Former Trump campaign chair Paul Manafort was sentenced Thursday to a term of nearly four years in prison for financial fraud during a hearing in Alexandria, Virginia. We've got some perspectives from the courtroom. Thanks for reading, and feel free to reach out any time at [email protected].
Inside the hearing
The hours that led up to Paul Manafort receiving his sentence for financial crimes in Virginia were marked by uneasy tension as the onetime Trump campaign chairman, pushed into the courtroom in a wheelchair, cast himself as a chastened man.
Ultimately, at the conclusion of Thursday's hearing, Manafort was sentenced by U.S. District Judge T.S. Ellis III to roughly four years in prison, a punishment that fell well short of the federal sentencing guideline range of 19-24 years. The term will fall closer to three years, since Ellis allowed Manafort to receive credit for the nine months he's already served.
➤➤ Would you like to receive Trump Watch as an email? Sign up here.
Manafort, who strode into court during his trial wearing suits, appeared Thursday grayer, more frayed, and confined to a wheelchair. (Manafort first appeared in Ellis' courtroom in a wheelchair last year. His attorneys later said their client suffered from gout, anxiety and depression.)
Again, the courtroom was packed, as spectators and reporters alike formed a queue outside. One juror from Manafort's trial even attended the spectacle.
In court filings, Manafort's attorney's sought to cast him as a man who accepted responsibility. The special counsel's office aggressively fought that notion Thursday, as prosecutor Greg Andres said Manafort's sentencing submissions were “replete with blaming others.”
In one exchange, as lawyers disagreed over how much credit Manafort should receive for sitting for 50 hours of cooperation, Andres told Ellis those house had amounted to nothing.
“That doesn't mean that he didn't cooperate,” Ellis said at one point, observing that it only meant the special counsel didn't find Manafort's information particularly valuable. Andres replied that “the reason” Manafort's cooperation lasted 50 hours was because “he lied.”
“It certainly wasn't 50 hours of information that was useful,” the prosecutor said.
When it came time for Manafort to speak, he attempted to paint himself as a humbled and changed man. As he rose from his wheelchair, the judge reminded him he did not need to stand.
“To say that I feel humiliated and ashamed would be a gross understatement,” Manafort said. “My life, professionally and financially, is in shambles.”
He even praised the fairness of the trial, marking some contrast between him and President Donald Trump, who has described the prosecution of his former campaign chair as unfair.
Manafort's comments—and their lack of contrition—didn't get past Ellis who remarked during the hearing that Manafort had not expressed any regret. “I certainly recommend that you do it in the District of Columbia,” Ellis said, referring to Manafort's upcoming sentencing in Washington.
Even then, Ellis issued a sentence that was 15 years less than the one recommended under sentencing guidelines. And while Ellis' past criticism of the Mueller probe came up again during the hearing, it appeared to play no role in his sentencing.
Instead, Ellis said he viewed the guideline range as “excessive,” and that he would avoid creating an “unwarranted disparity” with past sentences for felons convicted of similar charges.
“The government cannot sweep away” the history of those past sentences, Ellis said.
Criticism ricocheted from social media to cable shows, where people said Manafort's sentence highlighted the unfairness of the criminal justice system.
After the hearing, prosecutors and defense attorneys shook hands. Manafort's lead lawyer, Kevin Downing, later told reporters outside the courthouse that there was no evidence Manafort was involved in “collusion” with the Kremlin in the lead-up to the 2016 U.S. election.
Manafort faces the prospect of more time in prison when he appears before Judge Amy Berman Jackson for sentencing in the District Wednesday. He pleaded guilty to two conspiracy counts there.
Prosecutors have the chance to argue that her sentence should run consecutive, not concurrent, to Ellis'. Defense attorneys have said Manafort faces a maximum of 10 years in D.C.
Asked by Downing if he could order a concurrent sentence Thursday, Ellis said no. “It's up to her,” though Ellis said lawyers could return to him if his statement were later found to be incorrect.
Just before he delivered his punishment, Ellis reflected for a moment on a similar sentence he gave a man in a tax fraud case. He acknowledged that that outcome might not have been well liked.
He suggested his sentence for Manafort might not be well-received either.
But it would be a “just sentence,” he said. “I have satisfied myself about that.”
Speed Reads
>> Michael Cohen, Trump's former personal attorney and fixer, sued the Trump Organization in Manhattan Supreme Court on Thursday, “alleging it was supposed to cover his attorney fees and costs incurred in his work for the company,” the New York Law Journal reports.
>> “The ethics committee for the federal judiciary is warning judges to carefully consider their participation in events by groups that are 'engaged in public policy debates.'” [The NLJ]
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGovernment Attorneys Face Reassignment, Rescinded Job Offers in First Days of Trump Administration
4 minute readGibbons Reps Asylum Seekers in $6M Suit Over 2018 ‘Inhumane’ Immigration Policy
3 minute readLaw Firm Sued for Telemarketing Calls to Customers on Do Not Call Registry
Internal Whistleblowing Surged Globally in 2024, So Why Were US Numbers Flat?
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1We the People?
- 2New York-Based Skadden Team Joins White & Case Group in Mexico City for Citigroup Demerger
- 3No Two Wildfires Alike: Lawyers Take Different Legal Strategies in California
- 4Poop-Themed Dog Toy OK as Parody, but Still Tarnished Jack Daniel’s Brand, Court Says
- 5Meet the New President of NY's Association of Trial Court Jurists
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250