Trump Watch: A Look Inside Judge T.S. Ellis' Courtroom During Manafort's Sentencing
The courtroom was packed, as spectators and reporters alike formed a queue outside. One juror from Manafort's trial even attended the spectacle.
March 08, 2019 at 10:42 AM
5 minute read
Welcome back to Trump Watch. Former Trump campaign chair Paul Manafort was sentenced Thursday to a term of nearly four years in prison for financial fraud during a hearing in Alexandria, Virginia. We've got some perspectives from the courtroom. Thanks for reading, and feel free to reach out any time at [email protected].
|
Inside the hearing
The hours that led up to Paul Manafort receiving his sentence for financial crimes in Virginia were marked by uneasy tension as the onetime Trump campaign chairman, pushed into the courtroom in a wheelchair, cast himself as a chastened man.
Ultimately, at the conclusion of Thursday's hearing, Manafort was sentenced by U.S. District Judge T.S. Ellis III to roughly four years in prison, a punishment that fell well short of the federal sentencing guideline range of 19-24 years. The term will fall closer to three years, since Ellis allowed Manafort to receive credit for the nine months he's already served.
➤➤ Would you like to receive Trump Watch as an email? Sign up here.
Manafort, who strode into court during his trial wearing suits, appeared Thursday grayer, more frayed, and confined to a wheelchair. (Manafort first appeared in Ellis' courtroom in a wheelchair last year. His attorneys later said their client suffered from gout, anxiety and depression.)
Again, the courtroom was packed, as spectators and reporters alike formed a queue outside. One juror from Manafort's trial even attended the spectacle.
In court filings, Manafort's attorney's sought to cast him as a man who accepted responsibility. The special counsel's office aggressively fought that notion Thursday, as prosecutor Greg Andres said Manafort's sentencing submissions were “replete with blaming others.”
In one exchange, as lawyers disagreed over how much credit Manafort should receive for sitting for 50 hours of cooperation, Andres told Ellis those house had amounted to nothing.
“That doesn't mean that he didn't cooperate,” Ellis said at one point, observing that it only meant the special counsel didn't find Manafort's information particularly valuable. Andres replied that “the reason” Manafort's cooperation lasted 50 hours was because “he lied.”
“It certainly wasn't 50 hours of information that was useful,” the prosecutor said.
When it came time for Manafort to speak, he attempted to paint himself as a humbled and changed man. As he rose from his wheelchair, the judge reminded him he did not need to stand.
“To say that I feel humiliated and ashamed would be a gross understatement,” Manafort said. “My life, professionally and financially, is in shambles.”
He even praised the fairness of the trial, marking some contrast between him and President Donald Trump, who has described the prosecution of his former campaign chair as unfair.
Manafort's comments—and their lack of contrition—didn't get past Ellis who remarked during the hearing that Manafort had not expressed any regret. “I certainly recommend that you do it in the District of Columbia,” Ellis said, referring to Manafort's upcoming sentencing in Washington.
Even then, Ellis issued a sentence that was 15 years less than the one recommended under sentencing guidelines. And while Ellis' past criticism of the Mueller probe came up again during the hearing, it appeared to play no role in his sentencing.
Instead, Ellis said he viewed the guideline range as “excessive,” and that he would avoid creating an “unwarranted disparity” with past sentences for felons convicted of similar charges.
“The government cannot sweep away” the history of those past sentences, Ellis said.
Criticism ricocheted from social media to cable shows, where people said Manafort's sentence highlighted the unfairness of the criminal justice system.
After the hearing, prosecutors and defense attorneys shook hands. Manafort's lead lawyer, Kevin Downing, later told reporters outside the courthouse that there was no evidence Manafort was involved in “collusion” with the Kremlin in the lead-up to the 2016 U.S. election.
Manafort faces the prospect of more time in prison when he appears before Judge Amy Berman Jackson for sentencing in the District Wednesday. He pleaded guilty to two conspiracy counts there.
Prosecutors have the chance to argue that her sentence should run consecutive, not concurrent, to Ellis'. Defense attorneys have said Manafort faces a maximum of 10 years in D.C.
Asked by Downing if he could order a concurrent sentence Thursday, Ellis said no. “It's up to her,” though Ellis said lawyers could return to him if his statement were later found to be incorrect.
Just before he delivered his punishment, Ellis reflected for a moment on a similar sentence he gave a man in a tax fraud case. He acknowledged that that outcome might not have been well liked.
He suggested his sentence for Manafort might not be well-received either.
But it would be a “just sentence,” he said. “I have satisfied myself about that.”
|
Speed Reads
>> Michael Cohen, Trump's former personal attorney and fixer, sued the Trump Organization in Manhattan Supreme Court on Thursday, “alleging it was supposed to cover his attorney fees and costs incurred in his work for the company,” the New York Law Journal reports.
>> “The ethics committee for the federal judiciary is warning judges to carefully consider their participation in events by groups that are 'engaged in public policy debates.'” [The NLJ]
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Water Cooler Discussions': US Judge Questions DOJ Request in Google Search Case
3 minute readDemocratic State AGs Revel in Role as Last Line of Defense Against Trump Agenda
7 minute readBig Law Communications, Media Attorneys Brace for Changes Under Trump
4 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250