Herbert Smith Freehills Closes Seoul Office, Awaits Re-Registration as Australian Firm Ahead of Brexit
Seoul offices registered with U.K. firms may no longer be valid after Britain leaves the European Union.
March 11, 2019 at 01:46 PM
3 minute read
By John Kang
Herbert Smith Freehills has closed its office in South Korea as the firm prepares to change its Seoul office registration before Brexit. Under the new registration, the firm will be designated as Australia-based.
The six-year-old Seoul office has until now been registered as a foreign legal consultant office of a firm with headquarters in the United Kingdom. Under Korean law, only law firms with headquarters in countries that have a live free trade agreement with Korea are allowed to set up offices in Seoul.
So far, the five U.K. firms, including Herbert Smith Freehills, have been operating their foreign legal consultant offices under Korea's FTA with the European Union. But as Britain prepares to leave the EU, British firms' Seoul offices may no longer be covered by the EU-Korea FTA.
It is unclear whether or not the U.K. firms' Seoul offices will be allowed to continue operation after March 29, when Britain is scheduled to withdraw from the EU. In its response to The Asian Lawyer last week, the Korean Ministry of Justice said it is still reviewing post-Brexit policy regarding foreign law firms.
One option available to the British firms is to re-register their Seoul office's licence to one from a country that has an FTA with Korea. Herbert Smith Freehills Seoul partner Mike McClure told The Asian Lawyer last week the firm is applying to register as an Australian firm. Australia and Korea have had an effective FTA since 2014.
According to the justice ministry, in order to re-register, the government must first cancel the licence of the current EU FTA-based foreign legal consultant office; the firm must then file a new application for a foreign legal consultant office based on a separate FTA.
The Korean Foreign Legal Consultant Act, the governing regulation for foreign lawyers and foreign law firms in Korea, requires firms to register their Seoul offices under a home jurisdiction where a “principal office” is located and the “highest decisions are made.”
Herbert Smith Freehills' roots in both Britain and Australia afford the firm the ability to re-apply for a new license. It is unclear whether the rest of the U.K. firms—Allen & Overy, Clifford Chance, Linklaters and Stephenson Harwood—are able to follow suit. The justice ministry said it will determine whether an office is a “principal office” on a case-by-case basis.
Herbert Smith Freehills' Seoul office has eight lawyers, including office managing partner Dongho Lee and disputes partner McClure, who has been office representative. Once the firm switches to be an Australian firm, McClure will have to be replaced by an Australian-qualified lawyer as office representative. Currently, senior associate Ken Nam is the only Australian-qualified foreign legal consultant based in Seoul.
A Hong Kong-based spokesperson for Herbert Smith Freehills declined to comment on what will happen to the firm's eight Seoul-based lawyers while the firm waits for the result of its new Seoul office application.
|Related Stories:
Brexit Hits UK Law Firms in South Korea; Seoul Offices May Be Forced to Close Temporarily
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllContract Software Unicorn Ironclad Hires Former Pinterest Lawyer as GC
2 minute readFlorida-Based Law Firms Start to Lag, As New York Takes a Bigger Piece of Deals
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250