US Companies Filed Record Number of Applications With European Patent Office in 2018
European companies from 38 countries filed the most applications—47 percent—while companies based in Asia, including in China, Japan and the Republic of Korea, filed 22.6 percent.
March 12, 2019 at 03:00 AM
4 minute read
U.S. companies filed a record number of patent applications with the European Patent Office (EPO) in 2018, according to the EPO's annual report for 2018. The number – 43,612 – marked an increase of 2.7 percent compared to a year earlier – the second consecutive year that the number of U.S. applications increased, following a decline in 2016.
The U.S. was also the country with the single biggest share of applications at the EPO last year, with 25 percent of the total.
China filed 9,401 applications at the EPO in 2018. While this was an increase of 8.8 percent compared to a year ago, it marked the lowest rate of increase for Chinese applications in five years.
The EPO received 174,317 patent applications in 2018 – an increase of 4.6 percent compared to 2017.
U.S. companies were well represented in the EPO's main fields. They accounted for 38 percent of all patent applications at the EPO in computer technology, as well as in medical technology and pharmaceuticals, and 32 percent in biotechnology.
United Technologies was the most active U.S. patent applicant at the EPO, with 1,983 applications, followed by Qualcomm (1,593 applications), General Electric (1,307) and Intel (1,057).
Among U.S. companies, Microsoft was the leading patent applicant at the EPO in computer technology, with Intel in third place, Alphabet in fourth place, and Qualcomm in seventh. In medical technology, Johnson & Johnson was the new number one, pushing Royal Philips into second place, with Medtronic third, Boston Scientific fourth, and Procter & Gamble eighth.
Deere & Company was the leading applicant at the EPO in “other special machines”, a field covering inventions in several areas from agriculture to 3-D printing.
In pharmaceuticals, in addition to Merck being third and Johnson & Johnson ninth, several U.S. universities ranked among the top 20 filers. The University of California was the fifth-largest patent applicant in that field, the University of Pennsylvania was 11th, the University of Texas was 15th, and Johns Hopkins University was in 19th place.
European companies maintained the lead in their home market, with 47 percent of all patent applications at the EPO originating from the 38 countries that are members of the EPO. Asian companies also held their ground, with the combined share of applications from China, Japan and the Republic of Korea rising moderately to 22.6 percent from 22.1 percent in 2017.
Germany continued to be the most significant European country, with 26,734 applications, an increase of 4.7 percent compared to 2017. This was mainly due to an upward trend in the automotive sector and related areas, such as sensors and other measuring devices.
Among the other countries with high levels of filing activity, applications from Switzerland (+7.8 percent), the U.K. (+7.8 percent) and Sweden (+7.1 percent) continued to rise solidly. Declines were reported, however, for France (-2.8 percent) and Finland (-3.8 percent). Applications from most of France's 10 leading technical fields, especially biotechnology, medical technology and ICT, were down, while applications from Finland fell mostly in digital communication, computers and telecommunications.
Siemens was the top patent applicant at the EPO in 2018, with 2,493 applications. It last headed the ranking in 2011. Huawei, which was ranked first last year, came in second. They were followed by Korean companies Samsung and LG, and United Technologies.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFrom 'Confusing Labyrinth' to Speeding 'Roller Coaster': Uncertainty Reigns in Title IX as Litigators Await Second Trump Admin
6 minute readNew Class Action Points to Fears Over Privacy, Abortions and Fertility
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250