Forget Prom. This 16-Year-Old Is Headed to Law School
Haley Taylor Schlitz was accepted at five law schools but opted to enroll at Southern Methodist University Dedman School of Law, in part so she can still live at home with her parents.
March 14, 2019 at 01:53 PM
6 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Texas Lawyer
|
Most 16-year-olds spend the summer break working, going to camp, or hanging out with their friends. Not so for Haley Taylor Schlitz, who's on track to graduate with both an associate's and bachelor's degree in May. She'll spend the upcoming summer preparing to start law school and attending a six-day program with the American Civil Liberties Union in Washington for incoming law students.
Schlitz was accepted to all five law schools she applied to and has decided to attend Southern Methodist University Dedman School of Law. (The other law schools were at Howard University, University of Arkansas at Little Rock, Southern University and Texas Southern University.)
SMU could not say whether she's the youngest ever to enroll at the Dallas campus, though admissions officials said she's the youngest they know of. We caught up with Schlitz this week to discuss her law school plans, what inspired her to seek a J.D., and what she thinks her new classmates will make of a teenager in their midst. Her answers have been edited for length and clarity.
Why did you pick Southern Methodist University? Was there anything in particular that stood out? A lot of factors went into it. Obviously, I'm 16 so I want to stay at home. My parents suggested getting an apartment, but I really wanted to stay at home. That was huge. I'll commute every day I have class. SMU also offered me the biggest scholarship, which is important too. SMU isn't cheap—totally worth it but isn't cheap. It's a top 50 law school. It's the best law school I got into.
How is it possible that you will start law school at 17? Most law students are 21 and older. It starts way back in my elementary years. I went to public school until fifth grade. At the end of the year my parents pulled me out and started to home-school me because they didn't like the way I was being taught. I was just being taught to pass the end-of-the-year test to get to the next grade. I wasn't being taught to learn. I wasn't in the gifted and talented program because they said I wasn't allowed to be—that I couldn't take the test. My parents got me privately tested and then home-schooled me after they determined that I was gifted. I was home-schooled up until I was 13 years old. I skipped quite a few grades.
Then I graduated high school at 13 and went to the community college from 13 to 14, so I could get my core done. Then I got accepted into numerous different universities, and I went to Texas Woman's University from 14 to 16. And now I'm here at 16 and I applied to numerous different law schools and I'm going to law school.
When did you know you wanted to be a lawyer? My mom's a doctor, so as you can imagine I wanted to be a doctor until I was 12 or 13. I started at [Tarrant County College] with the idea I wanted to be a doctor. Then I looked back at my own story and realized the inequities there are in the education system, especially in the gifted and talented program with girls and girls of color. That's something I felt really passionate about because of my own story, that I wasn't even able to get in. Where I went there were a bunch of boys who were not of color who were able to get in at the same age I wasn't able to get in. It sparked a fire in me and made me want to fight for equality. My mom and dad said, “Well, you can be a lawyer.”
How was the LSAT for you? It was actually really fun. I did the whole program online and I really enjoyed it. I like standardized tests quite a bit. And the LSAT is really fun because it's almost like a puzzle or a mind game. It was really cool. When I took it, it's like they were asking me to solve riddles. I didn't really see it as a test, per se, but more like a game. It was awesome.
Do you get weird looks when you show up in college classes, or to take the LSAT, for example? That's exactly what you would think. And everywhere I go I feel like that's exactly how everybody should look at me. But people must think I'm older than I am because they don't. The only time I got kind of weird looks is when I was 13 and went to [Tarrant County College], because I guess it was really obvious I'm a kid. But when I go to [Texas Woman's University], nobody knows I am so young. When I go to tour SMU or other schools, nobody ever looks at me like that. And I always expect people to say, “Wait a second, how old are you?” And no one ever asks that.
How do you think your professors and classmates at SMU will react when you show up next fall? I recently went to a few law school events. When people found out I was 16 they were really surprised, obviously. Then they asked me how I got here. Every single time someone figures out my age, it changes the dynamic a bit. It's not bad, but it's new attention. But I like the attention. Everybody is always surprised at my age and they ask me a few questions. Then it's over. They're my friends and we work together. But it's not like I get treated differently, in a negative way, like, “Oh, you're a kid. I'm not listening to you.”
Any other ideas of what you want to use your law degree for? It's the educational policy, like we talked about. I'm also really interested in intellectual property. It hits so many things. That's another thing I'm looking into. It sounds cool.
What are you most looking forward to about law school? Probably the classes. I love learning and I'm really excited to learn more about the law and our society.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'No Evidence'?: Big Law Firms Defend Academic Publishers in EDNY Antitrust Case
3 minute readLaw Firms Are Turning to Online Training Platforms as Apprenticeship Model Falters
'Substantive Deficiencies': Judge Grants Big Law Motion Dismissing Ivy League Price-Fixing Claims
3 minute readClass Action Lawsuit Targets 40 Private Colleges and Universities Over Alleged Price-Fixing
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Election 2024: Nationwide Judicial Races and Ballot Measures to Watch
- 3Guarantees Are Back, Whether Law Firms Want to Talk About Them or Not
- 4How I Made Practice Group Chair: 'If You Love What You Do and Put the Time and Effort Into It, You Will Excel,' Says Lisa Saul of Forde & O'Meara
- 5Abbott, Mead Johnson Win Defense Verdict Over Preemie Infant Formula
- 6How Much Does the Frequency of Retirement Withdrawals Matter?
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250