Mayer Brown Terminates Partner Over 'Inappropriate Personal Conduct'
Mayer Brown's termination of a Chicago-based partner marks the second Big Law partner this month to be publicly dismissed amid controversy.
March 22, 2019 at 04:39 PM
2 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The American Lawyer
Mayer Brown has terminated Chicago-based banking and finance partner Zac Barnett due to “inappropriate personal conduct with a subordinate,” the firm said in a statement on Friday.
Barnett's conduct was unrelated to client matters and “is contrary to the firm's core values,” the statement said, adding that no further details would be provided to respect the privacy of a third party.
Barnett's termination marks the second Big Law partner to be publicly ousted by his firm this month related to inappropriate conduct. Pascal Agboyibor, the Paris-based head of Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe's Africa practice and a member of its board, was asked to leave the firm following an investigation that found evidence of inappropriate conduct and lapses in judgment, The American Lawyer reported.
Barnett is also the second partner in about a year to leave Mayer Brown under controversial circumstances that became public. Last March, capital markets partner James Tanenbaum resigned from the firm following allegations that he had engaged in inappropriate conduct at his former firm, Morrison & Foerster. Tanenbaum has denied the allegations.
At Mayer Brown, Barnett had risen by 2015 to be named leader of the firm's global fund finance, a practice that at the time of his promotion put him in charge of six partners and 17 associates and counsel. In that practice, Barnett represented lenders and borrowers in real estate, private equity, debt, energy, infrastructure and hedge fund financings, according to a firm statement announcing his promotion at the time.
Above the Law first reported Barnett's termination, citing an email chairman Paul Theiss sent to the firm's lawyers on Thursday night that largely mimicked the firm's statement on Friday.
A message sent to Barnett's LinkedIn profile was not immediately returned on Friday.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'You Can’t Do a First Draft of Common Sense': Microsoft GC Jon Palmer Talks AI, Litigation, and Leadership
Big Law Communications, Media Attorneys Brace for Changes Under Trump
4 minute readPolsinelli's Revenue and Profits Surge Amid Partner De-Equitizations, Retirements
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Beef Between Two South Florida Law Firms Deepens With Suit Over Defamation
- 2Judge Skips Over Sanctions in Talc Bankruptcy: 'That’s A No'
- 3Hit by Mail Truck: Man Agrees to $1.85M Settlement for Spinal Injuries
- 4Anticipating a New Era of 'Extreme Vetting,' Big Law Immigration Attys Prep for Demand Surge
- 5Deal Watch: What Dealmakers Are Thankful for in 2024
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250