Trump Watch: Day 674: We're Still Waiting For That Mueller Report
As the wait continues, we're rounding up what lawyers are saying about the Mueller report.
March 22, 2019 at 04:13 PM
6 minute read
With the country gripped by anticipation of the transmission of special counsel Robert Mueller's report to the attorney general, Mueller mania has swept over Washington. Seriously. With no report in sight, this is what the news cycle has come down to: a parody cow's Twitter account has overtaken a congressman's, and the commander-in-chief has been preoccupied with a Conway. Such is the state of a town waiting for big news. As the wait continues, we're rounding up what lawyers are saying about the Mueller report.
It has been 674 days since Robert Mueller was appointed special counsel. Since his May 2017 appointment, the former FBI director and WilmerHale partner has netted nearly three dozen indictments, brought even more criminal charges, and secured the convictions or guilty pleas of members of the Trump campaign or those in the president's orbit.
But what Mueller reveals next—and when—remains a mystery. Washington is still waiting for the special counsel's probe to conclude, and for Mueller to transmit a summary of his decisions to bring charges, or declining to bring charges, to Attorney General Bill Barr. What happens after that is even less clear.
The special counsel regulations require Barr to notify Congress once the probe ends. Barr's past statements leave open the possibility, however, that he could prepare more than one report. He could, for example, prepare one for lawmakers and one for the public. But how little or how much detail the AG would provide in any report is unclear. During his confirmation hearing, Barr vowed to provide as much transparency to the public as possible.
Here's a look at what some lawyers are expecting (or hoping for) from Mueller and Barr:
>> Ty Cobb, former Trump White House special counsel, told me: “I've always expected the report would be professional and conforming with the special counsel regulations, given my respect for Bob. I think it will be treated equally professionally within the Justice Department, and the attorney general will act appropriately in connection with whatever information he provides to Congress and the public… It's in the hands of professionals.”
But, he added: “I expect that the attorney general will submit a summary, or an explanation of the report, rather than the report itself, given the fact that the regulations governing the special counsel require certain information in the report that DOJ policy normally doesn't allow to be made public. For example, to the extent the report discusses who was investigated and not charged—typically the Justice Department doesn't allow that information to be made public.”
>> Mimi Rocah, Pace Law School fellow and former Southern District of New York prosecutor: “I know that there are Justice Department guidelines about not releasing information about people who are not being charged. I just don't think that those rules should apply here. Because those rules are about the public interest; they exist to protect the public interest, namely. If the Department of Justice is not pursuing its function of charging someone with evidence beyond a reasonable doubt, we should not make the findings that are damaging to those people public. But here, we have a person who literally because of a Justice Department policy, cannot be charged; so we, the public, deserve to know and need to know. The public interest here weighs in favor of transparency…” [MSNBC, 3/21/19]
>> Neal Katyal, Hogan Lovells partner who drafted the 1999 special counsel rules: “The report is unlikely to be a dictionary-thick tome, which will disappoint some observers. But such brevity is not necessarily good news for the president. In fact, quite the opposite. For months, the president's lawyers have tried to discredit Mr. Mueller and this report, but their efforts may have backfired. A concise Mueller report might act as a 'road map' to investigation for the Democratic House of Representatives — and it might also lead to further criminal investigation by other prosecutors. A short Mueller report would mark the end of the beginning, not the beginning of the end.” [New York Times, 2/21/19]
>> Marty Lederman, Georgetown University Law Center professor and Just Security founding editor: “The special counsel regulations require the attorney general himself to provide a “notification” to the leadership of the two congressional judiciary committees when Mueller's investigation ends… Barr's notification might conceivably consist of only a brief outline explaining why Mueller closed up shop, which is all the regulation formally requires. That's merely a floor, however, not a ceiling.” [Washington Post, 3/17/19]
||
Looking Back at Mueller's Other Report
Mueller issued another report over four years ago that made national headlines. That's when the special counsel, then at WilmerHale, led an investigation into the National Football League's handling of the scandal surrounding former Baltimore Ravens' star Ray Rice's domestic violence incident. Mueller's report, running at 96 pages, was released in 2015.
Alex Romain, a former Williams & Connolly partner who represented the Ravens during the investigation, was among the many waiting to see Mueller's report at the time. I recently caught up with Romain, now a Los Angeles-based partner at Irell & Manella, for his thoughts.
Q: You were on the receiving end of another big 'Mueller report' four years ago. What do you expect out of his report this time around? A: The Mueller Report will surely be thorough. And given the political framework, I also expect Mueller to reiterate the scope of his investigation in order to place his report in the appropriate context. Nevertheless, for many, the report will both provide comfort and cause dismay because Mueller may not have a definitive answer to every question. Q: What was it like working across from Mueller's team then?
A: As you know, it was a sensitive and highly-scrutinized investigation. Mueller's team was skilled and professional. They were tough and direct, but treated our client with respect. I think that is the most one can expect from an investigator. Q: It's unclear how much of this report will make it into public view. Do you think the public will feel closure at the conclusion of the special counsel's probe? A: I doubt it. Some folks would like a stamp of exoneration and others hope for a roadmap to impeachment. Neither camp is likely to be satisfied, and so both sides will press on after Mueller has issued his report. That continued agitation will not allow for closure anytime soon.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLegal Speak's 'Sidebar with Saul' Part II: GOP Pols Push Misinformation, Cohen Keeps It Together
1 minute readTrump Barred From Appearing on Illinois Ballot as Overarching SCOTUS Decision Looms
4 minute readThe Judiciary's Electronic Court System Gets Poor Marks | Plus, A Look at Judicial Noms' Pay
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Trump's Return to the White House: The Legal Industry Reacts
- 3Election 2024: Nationwide Judicial Races and Ballot Measures to Watch
- 4Climate Disputes, International Arbitration, and State Court Limitations for Global Issues
- 5Judicial Face-Off: Navigating the Ethical and Efficient Use of AI in Legal Practice [CLE Pending]
- 6How Much Does the Frequency of Retirement Withdrawals Matter?
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250