Europe Passes Controversial New Copyright Law
Technology platforms such as Google, YouTube and Facebook had opposed the changes, which will require them to compensate publishers, artists and musicians.
March 26, 2019 at 01:07 PM
3 minute read
EU lawmakers have approved controversial new copyright rules that aim to make it easier for content rights-holders to make money when their content is used on digital platforms but could force large platforms such as Google, Facebook and YouTube to make changes to their operations.
The rules also aim to protect the right to make creative use of content online.
After a 2-year battle, members of the European Parliament, the EU's legislative assembly, voted 348 in favour, 274 against copyright rules that seek to strengthen the negotiating position of owners of digital content such as films and music with digital platforms such as YouTube and Facebook.
“Today's vote ensures the right balance between the interests of all players—users, creators, authors, press—while putting in place proportionate obligations on online platforms,” the European Commission, which produced the first draft of the rules, said in a statement.
Helen Smith, executive chair of IMPALA, which represents independent record labels, declared the new rules a victory for creators of content.
“This is a landmark day for Europe's creators and citizens, and a significant step towards a fairer internet,” she said. “Platforms facilitate a unique relationship between artists and fans, and this will be given a boost as a result of this directive. It will have a ripple effect worldwide.”
Digital rights campaigners had called on lawmakers to drop part of the legislation that requires platforms to take down unauthorized content, saying it would force them to use crude content filters to guard against illegal content. These filters would automatically delete content for which users had not obtained explicit upload permission, stifling the creative use of digital content online.
Lawmakers rejected these arguments, put forward by Julia Reda, a member of Germany's pro-digital rights Pirate Party. Instead, they backed a range of exceptions that would allow content to be used for parody, quotation and other purposes.
Technology companies such as Google and Facebook had also opposed the copyright overhaul, stating that the changes would require them to build expensive content filters and stop linking to publications.
On Tuesday, Google issued a statement saying the EU's copyright reforms would produce legal uncertainty and hurt the bloc's creative and digital economies.
“The details matter, and we look forward to working with policymakers, publishers, creators and rights holders as EU member states move to implement these new rules,” the company said.
The new rules mean Google will have to pay fair compensation to publishers, artists and musicians.
Axel Voss, a conservative German lawmaker, said that claims that the new rules would stifle creativity were “complete exaggerations.”
The Commission said that the copyright rules would “protect freedom of expression” by setting “strong safeguards for users.” The use of existing works for purposes of quotation, criticism, review, caricature as well as parody would be explicitly allowed, according to the Commission. “Memes and similar parody creations can be used freely,” it said.
The rules, which need the final approval of the EU's 28 national governments, will come into effect in approximately two years.
|This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFrom 'Confusing Labyrinth' to Speeding 'Roller Coaster': Uncertainty Reigns in Title IX as Litigators Await Second Trump Admin
6 minute readNew Class Action Points to Fears Over Privacy, Abortions and Fertility
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250