Does Gonzaga Exist? Law School Lands on Jimmy Kimmel to Prove It's Real
Gonzaga University Law Dean Jacob Rooksby reveals how he and 50 law students ended up on Jimmy Kimmel Live!
March 27, 2019 at 05:39 PM
4 minute read
Gonzaga takes on Florida State University on Thursday to earn a spot in the Elite Eight, but the university's law school has already emerged as a big winner in this year's NCAA March Madness basketball tournament.
Dean Jacob Rooksby and about 50 law students made an appearance on Jimmy Kimmel Live! earlier this week to help prove the existence of the university. Yes, you read that right. You see, Kimmel has been joking on air about the fact that he doesn't believe Gonzaga University actually exists, and that it's an imaginary campus intended only to win basketball games. He has apparently raised the hackles of some in Spokane, Washington, who are vigorously defending the reality of the university.
Among those defenders are the law school. Rooksby and students appeared on air alongside Washington State Attorney General Bob Ferguson—in a law school classroom—to prove Gonzaga's existence. In the segment, they all take an oath, complete with a “real Bible,” saying, “I am a real student, with real student debt.” The kicker comes when the camera zooms in on that Bible to reveal the true title: “How to Run a Fake College.” (Comedian Fred Willard later appears as Gonzaga's sham chancellor.)
We're guessing that Rooksby is the first law dean to hit the late night circuit in some time. We caught up with him Wednesday to talk about how the appearance came together and what reaction the law school has received. His answers are edited for length and clarity.
How did this come together? I know Jimmy Kimmel had been joking about Gonzaga not being real. But how did it go from a joke to the law school getting on air? Our state attorney general, Bob Ferguson, had sent a tweet to Jimmy, and Jimmy responded “I'll believe you if you swear on a stack of bibles.” Bob thought it would be fun if he swore on a stack of bibles here at our law school. He was planning to be in town so we said, “Sure, stop by.” We sent an email out to the student body and said, “Who wants to do this fun video?” We had a nice turnout. There was lots of interest. Bob came, and we came up with a plan on the spot and filmed it. He sent it to their producer.
Did you film it with a goal of making the show? Yeah. We thought we had a good chance to have a witty comeback with this video showing that Gonzaga really does exists, and we would swear to that fact on film. We filmed it Friday, and we knew we were too late to make the show Friday because he had already taped. But on Monday, we hadn't received any word about whether or not that video would play on the show. But I had friends and family on the East Coast who were texting me Monday to say, “Oh my God, that video made it on the Jimmy Kimmel show!” So we could then notify people here in Washington State to tune in.
The gag with the bible—is that something you came up with, or was it Kimmel? We used an actual Bible. We're a Catholic law school, so we had one in the building. What he put on it—How to Run a Fake College—was all Jimmy Kimmel.
What kind of reaction have you received thus far to the segment? It has really energized our students and alumni. It's not every day you get on national television and get written up in the national media. The New York Times had a little piece on that, as did Time Magazine. We're having fun with it. The whole joke is, “Does Gonzaga exist or not?” Not usually what you think of as the brand messaging you want. But in this case, any PR is good PR for us.
I have to ask, what's up with the fuzzy hats? We figured we should look memorable in the video. Somebody had in their office these troll-like hats that we decided to put on. It's not the typical law school or attorney general attire.
Any predictions on Thursday's game against Florida State? We're definitely winning. We know that. It's going to be a challenging game, but we're certainly optimistic about the outcome.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Everything From A to Z': University GCs Tested by Legal, Financial, Societal Challenges
6 minute read'A Horrible Reputation for Bad Verdicts': Plaintiffs Attorney Breaks Down $129M Wrongful-Death Verdict From Conservative Venue
How Uncertainty in College Athletics Compensation Could Drive Lawsuits in 2025
'Basic Arithmetic': Court Rules in Favor of LA Charter School Denied Funding by California Education Department
Trending Stories
- 1'Largest Retail Data Breach in History'? Hot Topic and Affiliated Brands Sued for Alleged Failure to Prevent Data Breach Linked to Snowflake Software
- 2Former President of New York State Bar, and the New York Bar Foundation, Dies As He Entered 70th Year as Attorney
- 3Legal Advocates in Uproar Upon Release of Footage Showing CO's Beat Black Inmate Before His Death
- 4Longtime Baker & Hostetler Partner, Former White House Counsel David Rivkin Dies at 68
- 5Court System Seeks Public Comment on E-Filing for Annual Report
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250