What Will Retirement Look Like for Millennials?
This generation has advantanges, and some disadvantages, over older generations, Brookings reports.
March 29, 2019 at 03:35 PM
4 minute read
Retirement InvestingThe original version of this story was published on Law.com
A new report from the Brookings Institution examines the prospects for retirement saving by millennials in 2050, when members of that generation will range in age from 54 to 69.
The report finds that millennials will head into retirement with several advantages over earlier generations, but also some disadvantages.
Start with the advantages. Millennials are the most educated generation in history, according to Brookings. In addition, owing to the pension system's evolution toward defined contribution plans, they may remain in the workforce longer than any previous generation, giving them additional years to save.
On the other side of the ledger, millennials started work in the wake of the financial crisis and recession and during the slow but steady recovery. Many more than in previous generations are employed in contingent workforce jobs that have less robust retirement benefits than traditional jobs.
As well, they have lower net worth and higher student debt burdens than their parents and grandparents at the same age. They are marrying, buying homes and starting families later. They will likely live longer, and at the same time, have to manage and navigate their own retirement plans to a greater extent than previous generations.
Millennials can also look forward to increased burdens from any resolution of the government's long-term fiscal shortfalls in general, and the financial imbalances in Social Security and Medicare in particular. They face an economic future with projections of lower rates of return and economic growth than in the past.
This means millennials will have a harder time that previous generations accumulating sufficient funds for retirement.
The report also looks at the effects of changing demographics over the next three decades. By 2050, according to the research, the U.S. will be a "majority-minority" country, where minority is defined as any race other than non-Hispanic white. All races and ethnicities other than white are expected to grow as a share of the population.
The Brookings authors found that minority status is negatively associated with net worth, controlling for other household characteristics. The difference in wealth between blacks and whites is growing over time, controlling for other factors.
What are the implications for millennials? According to the report, economic and social conditions that racial and ethnic minorities experience by 2050 will likely be different from those experienced by previous generations. These include family and marital status, education, neighborhoods, discrimination and job markets. These differences could work either to raise or reduce wealth gaps between whites and minorities, it said.
The report found that minorities have faced different economic and social realities in recent years than minorities did 30 years ago, but wealth differences between them and whites, controlling for observable characteristics, have grown rather than fallen over time. If this trend continues, it said, wealth inequality will continue to increase, making it that much harder for minorities to save adequately for retirement.
Closing the income gap will be hard, according to Brookings. And even if income differences between groups were eventually reduced or eliminated, that by itself would not be enough to ensure adequate saving for minority households. The retirement saving gap between minorities and whites would persist.
The report concludes on a hopeful note. "Ensuring the adequacy of saving presents enormous challenges and risks for individuals, government and businesses. However, it also generates unique opportunities for creative public policies and innovative private markets to greatly improve people's lives."
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250