First Department Suspends Adam Leitman Bailey for 4 Months
The panel rejected his argument that a mere censure would be appropriate, noting that he had been chastised twice before for "inappropriate litigation behavior."
April 02, 2019 at 05:50 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on New York Law Journal
Prominent real estate lawyer Adam Leitman Bailey was suspended from the New York bar for four months on Tuesday over accusations that he barged into an arbitration hearing and swore at a witness and that he threatened to refer a tenant for criminal prosecution over comments posted online.
Bailey, whose eponymous firm employs 26 lawyers and 24 staff, was hit with the suspension by the Appellate Division, First Department. The panel rejected his argument that a mere censure would be appropriate, noting that he had been chastised twice before for “inappropriate litigation behavior.”
“Given this and his failure to take full responsibility for the conduct that led to the instant proceeding, we find that a four-month suspension and a referral to the New York City Bar Association's Lawyer Assistance Program for counseling is an appropriate sanction in this case,” the panel said Tuesday.
Bailey was directed to engage in counseling for “up to one year,” as determined by the bar's Lawyer Assistance Program.
According to the panel's decision, Bailey's first act of misconduct took place in November 2016. He allegedly walked into a conference room at his firm where a witness was testifying in an arbitration, began taking pictures with his phone, and said, “This will be in the newspaper when I put this in there after we kick your asses. You should be ashamed of yourselves for kicking people out of a building and you have to live with yourself.”
The second act of misconduct involved postings allegedly made by James Dawson, a tenant in a building whose owner Bailey represented. The lawyer called Dawson, who recorded the call, told him he “should commit suicide,” and swore at him and threatened to report him to prosecutors for unspecified wrongdoing.
“Welcome to my world. Now you're my bitch,” the decision quotes Bailey as saying. “You're gonna be paying for this heavily for the rest of your life.”
The panel's decision to impose a four-month suspension is more severe than the three-month suspension recommended by a referee who handled an earlier stage of the disciplinary proceedings.
The First Department panel includes Justices Dianne Renwick, Rosalyn Richter, Sallie Manzanet-Daniels, Troy Webber and Ellen Gesmer.
Michael Ross, who represented Bailey in the disciplinary case, said his client was very sorry for his wrongdoing.
“Mr. Bailey is deeply apologetic for his unfortunate conduct in the matters that led to his suspension,” he said in an email. “He has committed his entire life to advancing the interests of his clients and, unfortunately, he allowed his emotions to trump his good judgment in these matters. Mr. Bailey is thankful for the unwavering support of his family, his friends and his clients.”
In light of Bailey's suspension, the real estate boutique he founded will undergo some changes. Joanna Peck, an associate at Bailey's firm, told ALM that the firm will be run by and take the names of its partners John Desiderio, Colin Kaufman and Jeffrey Metz in Bailey's absence.
Peck said she was surprised by the decision but that Bailey didn't work on any matter alone and that the firm's attorneys would remain focused on delivering for their clients.
Dawson, who is not a lawyer, previously sued Bailey, Adam Leitman Bailey P.C. and other lawyers at the firm in Manhattan Supreme Court. The suit was dismissed last year, and Dawson has appealed that decision.
He praised Bailey's suspension in an email and said the lawyer went too far by encouraging him to kill himself. “I am thankful to see the [Attorney Grievance Committee] hold the remorseless Bailey accountable for his transgressions,” Dawson said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllContract Software Unicorn Ironclad Hires Former Pinterest Lawyer as GC
2 minute readFlorida-Based Law Firms Start to Lag, As New York Takes a Bigger Piece of Deals
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250