Chinese Company Pressured by US Government to Sell Dating App Grindr
The interagency body known as CFIUS is reportedly concerned that Chinese ownership of Grindr poses national security risks.
April 03, 2019 at 04:59 PM
4 minute read
|
Chinese online game developer Beijing Kunlun Tech Co. Ltd. has confirmed that it is in talks with the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States regarding a potential divestment of its U.S. subsidiary Grindr, a gay dating app.
In a filing on Monday, Shenzhen-listed Kunlun said that it is negotiating with CFIUS over its ownership of Grindr, but has not reached an agreement. Last week Reuters reported that CFIUS was concerned that Kunlun's ownership of Grinder posed national security risks.
If Kunlun does indeed end up selling Grindr, it will be a rare case of CFIUS making an investor undo a deal that has already been completed. Most of the previous objections against Chinese investments from CFIUS came before the deal closed. In one other instance, in late 2012, after receiving recommendations from CFIUS, then-President Barack Obama ordered the Chinese company Ralls Corp. to sell four wind farms it had purchased earlier that year in Oregon.
In the Ralls' case, however, CFIUS objected to the investment because one of the wind farms was located close to a military base where the U.S. Navy trains its pilots, a concern that conformed to traditional national security threats. Now, the government seems to have taken a more expansive view of national security.
Observers say the current CFIUS move demonstrates that the U.S. now views data security as a major national security threat. Grindr, which has more than 27 million users, collects personal data such as location, photos and even HIV status. CFIUS' objections suggest the government is concerned that foreign ownership of such information could enable foreign governments to use personal data as a means of influence or blackmail. Last year, Democratic Sens. Edward Markey and Richard Blumenthal wrote an open letter questioning how Grindr handles sensitive personal information.
It isn't the first time data security has played a role in destroying an investment deal. Last year, CFIUS helped kill a proposed merger between MoneyGram and the Chinese firm Ant Financial, also apparently over data privacy concerns.
Since assuming office in 2017, the Trump administration has ramped up CFIUS investigations into Chinese deals. Between 1975 and 2011, CFIUS blocked only one transaction, but has helped block five deals since 2012.
As a result, Chinese investment into the U.S. dropped to a mere $5 billion in 2018 from $45.6 billion in 2016, according to data compiled by Baker McKenzie and Rhodium Group.
Kunlun made its first investment in Grindr in 2016, a record year for Chinese overseas investment, paying $93 million for a 61.53 percent stake in the California-based company; the Chinese company bought the remainder in 2017 for another $152 million. According to Reuters, neither deal sought CFIUS clearance voluntarily.
CFIUS has not made a public announcement regarding the Grindr deal. In its past recommendations, the interagency committee, which is led by the Department of the Treasury secretary, was reluctant to elaborate beyond expressing concerns over potential national security risks.
Both of Kunlun's Grindr investments were made before the passage of the Foreign Investment Risk Review Modernization Act of 2018, known as FIRRMA. The relatively new act requires mandatory CFIUS filings for deals involving sensitive personal data of U.S. citizens.
Related Stories:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllManhattan Prosecutors Say They Will Oppose Efforts by Trump Legal Team to Dismiss Case
'We’re Here to Empower People to Make Good Decisions': Why Compliance Chiefs Must Learn to Think Like a Businessperson
Lawyers Among Those Convicted as Hong Kong's High Court Sentences 45 Activists to Prison
Apple Asks Judge to 'Follow the Majority Practice' in Dismissing Patent Dispute Over Night Vision Technology
Trending Stories
- 1How GC-of-Year Sam Khichi Has Helped CVS Barrel Through Challenges
- 2A Website is Not a ‘Place.’ What Took So Long To Get This Right?
- 3From ‘Deep Sadness’ to Little Concern, Gaetz’s Nomination Draws Sharp Reaction From Lawyers
- 4Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference East 2024: Julie Cantor, Associate General Counsel at Studs, Inc.
- 5Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference East 2024: Chris Correnti, President & CEO & General Counsel AGC America, Inc.
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250