Report Ranks Global Industries With the Highest Corruption Risks
The global construction industry is rife with compliance threats, especially in emerging markets where government corruption can taint infrastructure projects, according to a new report.
April 08, 2019 at 02:59 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Corporate Counsel
Global companies operating in the construction industry face a minefield of corruption threats, according to a new report that ranks industries and countries based on the compliance risk challenges they pose to foreign investors.
Findings from the Risk Advisory Group, an international risk consultancy firm, in its 2019 Corruption Challenges Index track recent observations from former federal prosecutors, criminal defense attorneys and construction and government contracts lawyers.
They've warned that the U.S. Department of Justice is focusing more on the construction industry for enforcement actions under the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act.
Atlanta-based Alston & Bird partner Paul Monnin, a former assistant U.S. attorney who served as deputy chief of the economic crimes section, said previously that the target-rich environment of the construction industry has become “the frontier right now on corruption and bribery and fraud enforcement.”
Goran Maksimovic, Risk Advisory's London-based director of corporate investigations and disputes, cited several factors underlying compliance risks in the construction industry, namely government corruption and money laundering. The former factor tends to be more prevalent in emerging markets, where foreign companies might be pressured to pay bribes for building permits, though it also can be a factor in more mature markets.
Maksimovic added, “We're increasingly encountering real estate construction companies being used as money laundering vehicles, particularly by high-profile business people.”
Other high-risk sectors include the energy industry and banking and finance, according to the report. Companies in those realms seeking to minimize corruption risks should “know your market and know your partners,” Maksimovic said.
Of course, companies will encounter more compliance problems in some outside jurisdictions than others. For instance, Turkmenistan, Libya, Somalia, Yemen, Central African Republic and the Democratic Republic of Congo have elevated corruption threats, according to the report.
While the report found that Africa has the highest average corruption challenge score in the world, there are bright spots amid the continent's apparent danger zones, including Namibia, Botswana and South Africa, where corruption risks are relatively low.
Companies with leaders “who know the value of what hides behind Africa's complexities and are willing to seek the intelligence required to forge the best path” will find “business possibilities” on the resource-rich continent, according to Hannah Gilkes, Risk Advisory's head of business intelligence in Africa.
On the opposite end of the spectrum, New Zealand was tops across the board for being the least challenging jurisdiction in terms of corruption risks and transparency. Australia, Singapore, Ireland and the United Kingdom also received nods for low corruption risks.
The findings are based, in part, on Risk Advisory's due diligence experts' assessments of the probability that a company will be exposed to corruption when seeking government contracts, licenses or permits in a certain jurisdiction. The report also considered the pervasiveness of local, small-scale official corruption. Those assessments were added to regime stability and transparency scores to determine overall corruption threat ratings.
Read More:
In-House Counsel in Construction Industry May See Uptick in Anti-Corruption Enforcement
Increased Prosecutions Will Likely Lead to Welcomed FCPA Clarity
Tech Services Company Cognizant to Pay $25M Over Bribery Allegations
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllChicago Law Requiring Women, Minority Ownership Stake in Casinos Is Unconstitutional, New Suit Claims
5 minute readFree Microsoft Browser Extension Is Costing Content Creators, Class Action Claims
3 minute readFired by Trump, EEOC's First Blind GC Lands at Nonprofit Targeting Abuses of Power
3 minute readIndian Law Firm Cyril Amarchand Rolls Out AI Strategy, Adopts Suite of AI Tools
Trending Stories
- 1Critical Mass With Law.com's Amanda Bronstad: 700+ Residents Near Ohio Derailment File New Suit, Is the FAA to Blame For Last Month's Air Disasters?
- 2Law Journal Column on Marital Residence Sales in Pending Divorces Puts 'Misplaced' Reliance on Two Cases
- 3A Message to the Community: Meeting the Moment in 2025
- 4Ex-Prosecutor Denies on Witness Stand That She Tried to Protect Ahmaud Arbery's Killers
- 5Latham's Lateral Hiring Picks Up Steam, With Firm Adding Simpson Practice Head, Private Equity GC
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250