Which U.K. Law Firms Had The Worst Gender Pay Gap Numbers?
The worst offenders have emerged in the analysis by Law.com affiliate Legal Week of the top 50 U.K. firms ranked by gender pay gap.
April 08, 2019 at 08:33 AM
4 minute read
Macfarlanes, Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner and Mishcon de Reya were the worst-performing firms for gender pay parity according to this year's figures, which also show the U.K.'s top tier legal industry as a whole has made barely any progress on the issue.
Legal Week analysis of the top 50 firms' reported numbers found Macfarlanes posted the largest pay gap for all partners and staff at 75.3 percent on average. In contrast, Trowers & Hamlins measured the smallest combined pay gap at 25.5 percent.
Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner, meanwhile, had the largest average gender pay gap for its employees, excluding partners, at 33 percent.
Regarding the statistics, Macfarlanes senior partner Charles Martin said in a statement: ”We launched last year an extensive range of commitments designed to address a number of inclusion challenges that we face. All of these are being actively progressed as rapidly as possible and progress reported on to the whole firm.
“The gender pay gap and other gender and broader inclusion statistics will improve but these things do take time to work through.”
Also responding to the figures in a statement to Legal Week, BCLP co-chairs Lisa Mayhew and Therese Pritchard added: “As a firm that is very proud to be led by two women, we take gender pay gap reporting very seriously and acknowledge that much more needs to be done within our profession and globally.
“2018 was a unique pay gap reporting year for BCLP, with legacy firms Berwin Leighton Paisner and Bryan Cave merging four days before the date against which gender pay figures must be calculated. This makes a like for like comparison with 2017 impossible as legacy Bryan Cave was not required to report.”
Mishcon, meanwhile, measured the largest median pay gap among its staff excluding partners at 40.2 percent. Pennington Manches reported the smallest median pay gap for staff members at 5.60 percent.
This year's gender pay gap reporting round shows that among the Top 50 UK law firms, average pay disparity has dropped only 1 percent since last year, despite the cohort having made a concerted effort to reveal a broader set of statistics.
Disclosure has improved, however, with the majority of firms reporting the gender pay gap among their partnerships after politicians piled on the pressure last year to improve transparency in the sector.
In total, 33 of the top 50 reported combined partner and employee pay gap figures – a vast improvement on last year's figure of seven.
Linklaters and Simmons & Simmons were the only two firms in the top 20 not to report standalone figures for the firm's partnership, both opting instead to report combined partner and employee statistics.
Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer reported the smallest hourly pay gap for staff with a mean gap of 5.7 percent and a median gap of 6.2 percent.
However, Freshfields also had the largest combined pay gap out of the top 10 UK law firms. In its report, the firm cited the lockstep model as a key contributor to the pay gap, highlighting that 23 percent of its UK partnership is female.
In a new trend for this year, 15 of the top 50 UK law firms released ethnicity pay gap data, including all of the magic circle. Clifford Chance was the only firm to measure its disability and sexuality pay gaps.
With reporting by James Willer, ALM Intelligence.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Radical Left Judges'?: Trump Demands GOP Unity Against Biden's Judicial Picks
4 minute readMorgan & Morgan Looks to Grow Into Complex Litigation While Still Keeping its Billboards Up
6 minute readFrom ‘Deep Sadness’ to Little Concern, Gaetz’s Nomination Draws Sharp Reaction From Lawyers
7 minute readTrending Stories
- 1AI: An Enhancement, Not a Replacement for Attorneys
- 2Fowler White Burnett Opens Jacksonville Office Focused on Transportation Practice
- 3Auditor Finds 'Significant Deficiency' in FTC Accounting to Tune of $7M
- 4'A Mockery' of Deposition Rules: Walgreens Wins Sanctions Dispute Over Corporate Witness Allegedly Unfamiliar With Company
- 5Call for Nominations: TLI's Pennsylvania Legal Awards 2025
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250