Carnival Cruise Ships Could Be Temporarily Blocked From Docking in the US
Carnival has been on probation since 2017 as part of a $40 million settlement stemming from a years-long investigation that revealed ships were illegally dumping oil into the ocean and falsifying their logs to hide it from authorities. Federal prosecutors say Carnival has since violated that probation.
April 11, 2019 at 01:26 PM
3 minute read
A federal judge has threatened to temporarily stop Carnival Corp. ships from docking at U.S. ports for a possible probation violation.
Carnival has been on probation since 2017 as part of a $40 million settlement, according to The Miami Herald. Princess Cruises, owned by Carnival, was charged by federal prosecutors with seven felonies, stemming from a years-long investigation that revealed ships were illegally dumping oil into the ocean and falsifying their logs to hide it from authorities. The U.S. Department of Justice said it was the largest fine ever imposed for vessel pollution crimes.
Federal prosecutors say Carnival has since violated that probation. According to court filings, Carnival and its subsidiary cruise lines have dumped both gray water into Glacier Bay National Park in Alaska and garbage into the ocean. The company has falsified records and prepared ships in advance of court-ordered audits to circumvent unfavorable findings. Carnival has also attempted lobbying the U.S. Coast Guard through a back channel to change the terms of the settlement, prosecutors say.
The company has acknowledged these incidents in court filings.
U.S. District Senior Judge Patricia Seitz of the Southern District of Florida had ordered the company to cease its court-ordered audit preparation program in December 2017, and Carnival said it stopped at that time. Prosecutors allege the company continued the practice well into 2018, citing internal emails that discussed how to prepare for the audits.
During a Wednesday hearing, Seitz said she will make a decision in June about revoking Carnival's probation and punishing the company by preventing its ships from docking in U.S. ports. She also said she wanted Carnival chairman Mickey Arison and president Donald Arnold to be at that hearing. Both were absent on Wednesday.
“The people at the top are treating this as a gnat,” the judge said. “If I could, I would give all the members of the executive committee a visit to the detention center for a couple of days. It's amazing how that helps people come to focus on reality.”
After the Wednesday hearing, Carnival chief communications officer Roger Frizzell delivered a statement in which he lamented “some mischaracterizations made by others to the court. We intend to fully address the issues raised at today's court conference.”
“Our environmental responsibility has been and continues to be a top priority for the company,” Frizzell said. ”Our aspiration is to leave the places we touch even better than when we first arrived. This is only in the best interest of our guests, our company and the oceans upon which we travel.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllUber Not Responsible for Turning Over Information on 'Dangerous Riders' to Competitor, Judge Finds
5 minute readJudge Relies on Recent 8th Circuit Clarification in Quest for Punitive Damages Against Logistics Company
5 minute read'A Fierce Battle of Expert Witnesses' Expected in Cybersecurity Spat
Big Law Assembles as Cruise Lines Clinch Partial Victory in $439M Havana Docks Suit
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250