SEC Fires Off Warning on Privacy Regulation
OCIE sets out violations of Reg S-P that have shown up in recent exams.
April 17, 2019 at 10:30 AM
3 minute read
Federal RegulationThe original version of this story was published on Law.com
The Securities and Exchange Commission is warning advisors and broker-dealers in a just-released Risk Alert to review their policies and procedures regarding Regulation S-P, the privacy rule, as a host of deficiencies are being spotted in exams.
The Office of Compliance Inspections and Examinations provides a list of compliance issues related to Reg S-P, the primary SEC rule regarding privacy notices and safeguard policies of investment advisors and broker-dealers.
Reg S-P requires BDs and advisors to provide a "clear and conspicuous notice" to customers that accurately reflects the firm's privacy policies not less than annually, and to deliver a clear and conspicuous notice explaining their right to opt out of some disclosures of non-public personal information about the customer to nonaffiliated third parties.
(Related: Will Trump Memo Slow Down SEC's Reg BI?)
The agency charged Voya Financial Advisors Inc. last September with violating Reg S-P or the Safeguards Rule and the Identity Theft Red Flags Rule.
In the Tuesday Risk Alert, OCIE details the most common deficiencies or weaknesses cited in exams.
Examiners observed registrants that did not provide Initial Privacy Notices, Annual Privacy Notices and Opt-Out Notices to their customers. "When such notices were provided to customers, the notices did not accurately reflect firms' policies and procedures," the alert states.
Also, advisors and broker-dealers also did not have written policies and procedures as required under the Safeguards Rule.
For instance, policies and procedures were cited that did not appear to be reasonably designed to safeguard customer information on personal devices.
OCIE staff observed "registrants' employees who regularly stored and maintained customer information on their personal laptops, but the registrants' policies and procedures did not address how these devices were to be properly configured to safeguard the customer information," the alert states.
Policies and procedures were also found that did not address the inclusion of customer personally identifiable information ("PII") in electronic communications.
OCIE examiners observed registrants that did not appear to have policies and procedures reasonably designed to prevent employees from regularly sending unencrypted emails to customers containing PII, according to the alert.
Inadequate training was also observed. Firms' policies and procedures that required customer information to be encrypted, password-protected, and transmitted using only registrant-approved methods "were not reasonably designed because employees were not provided adequate training on these methods and the firm failed to monitor if the policies were being followed by employees."
— Related on ThinkAdvisor:
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1As 'Red Hot' 2024 for Legal Industry Comes to Close, Leaders Reflect and Share Expectations for Next Year
- 2Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 3Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 4Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 5Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250