Time to Prepare for the EU's New Whistleblower Protection Rules
The proposed rules aim to bring consistency to whistleblower protection standards across the EU, where only 10 of 28 member countries have comprehensive legal protections in place for whistleblowers.
April 19, 2019 at 03:06 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Corporate Counsel
Now that the European Parliament has voted overwhelmingly to approve new rules that establish uniform standards for protecting whistleblowers from retaliation, companies that do business in any of the European Union's 28 member countries should be preparing to avoid running afoul of the forthcoming law.
The rules are slated to take effect in two years, assuming that EU ministers approve the law, which is likely—observers expect that this is essentially a done deal.
“Color me surprised if this doesn't go,” Shon Ramey, general counsel of NAVEX Global Inc., an Oregon-based ethics and compliance software company, said in an interview Friday.
Under the EU's heightened standards, businesses will have to implement systems that allow whistleblowers to remain anonymous while reporting their concerns internally to company representatives or externally to authorities, the public or news outlets. Companies also will be banned from retaliating against whistleblowers and bear the burden of proving that they have not retaliated.
The proposed rules aim to bring consistency to whistleblower protection standards across the EU, which currently has a “patchwork of laws and regulations concerning whistleblowers' rights,” according to Ramey.
At the moment, only 10 EU member countries—France, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Lithuania, Malta, the Netherlands, Slovakia, Sweden and the U.K.—have comprehensive legal protections in place for whistleblowers.
Ramey wrote in a blog post that the EU's vote April 16 in which 591 lawmakers were in favor of the new rules and only 29 were in opposition suggests the “beginning of a European Union perspective shift on whistleblowing.”
EU Parliament member Virginie Rozière of France said in a prepared statement that whistleblowers suffer “great precariousness.”
“On the eve of European elections,” she added, “Parliament has come together to send a strong signal that it has heard the concerns of its citizens, and pushed for robust rules guaranteeing their safety and that of those persons who choose to speak out.”
The new standards will apply to all private companies with more than 50 employees or with an annual turnover of more than 10 million euros, about $11.2 million; all state and regional agencies; and all local municipalities with more than 10,000 residents.
The entities covered by the law will have to ensure that they have established systems to receive confidential whistleblower reports in writing or over the phone and acknowledge receipt of a report within seven days, according to Ramey. He said companies also have to generate confirmation report numbers and keys or pin codes for each whistleblower notification they receive.
Whistleblower reporting systems can cost a few thousand dollars for small businesses or hundreds of thousands of dollars for global companies, Ramey said.
“If I'm the general counsel or chief compliance officer of one of these companies, I want one of these [systems] because I want a reporter who has a legitimate issue, an issue that I need to be thinking about from a compliance or good business standpoint, to have the easiest path in reporting that,” he said.
He added that when it's difficult or risky to report concerns internally, whistleblowers tend to look for help outside the company, which can prove costly for a business.
“You as a company do not want to be litigating this in the public forum,” Ramey said.
Read More:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFrom 'Confusing Labyrinth' to Speeding 'Roller Coaster': Uncertainty Reigns in Title IX as Litigators Await Second Trump Admin
6 minute readNew Class Action Points to Fears Over Privacy, Abortions and Fertility
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250