Time to Prepare for the EU's New Whistleblower Protection Rules
The proposed rules aim to bring consistency to whistleblower protection standards across the EU, where only 10 of 28 member countries have comprehensive legal protections in place for whistleblowers.
April 19, 2019 at 03:06 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Corporate Counsel
Now that the European Parliament has voted overwhelmingly to approve new rules that establish uniform standards for protecting whistleblowers from retaliation, companies that do business in any of the European Union's 28 member countries should be preparing to avoid running afoul of the forthcoming law.
The rules are slated to take effect in two years, assuming that EU ministers approve the law, which is likely—observers expect that this is essentially a done deal.
“Color me surprised if this doesn't go,” Shon Ramey, general counsel of NAVEX Global Inc., an Oregon-based ethics and compliance software company, said in an interview Friday.
Under the EU's heightened standards, businesses will have to implement systems that allow whistleblowers to remain anonymous while reporting their concerns internally to company representatives or externally to authorities, the public or news outlets. Companies also will be banned from retaliating against whistleblowers and bear the burden of proving that they have not retaliated.
The proposed rules aim to bring consistency to whistleblower protection standards across the EU, which currently has a “patchwork of laws and regulations concerning whistleblowers' rights,” according to Ramey.
At the moment, only 10 EU member countries—France, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Lithuania, Malta, the Netherlands, Slovakia, Sweden and the U.K.—have comprehensive legal protections in place for whistleblowers.
Ramey wrote in a blog post that the EU's vote April 16 in which 591 lawmakers were in favor of the new rules and only 29 were in opposition suggests the “beginning of a European Union perspective shift on whistleblowing.”
EU Parliament member Virginie Rozière of France said in a prepared statement that whistleblowers suffer “great precariousness.”
“On the eve of European elections,” she added, “Parliament has come together to send a strong signal that it has heard the concerns of its citizens, and pushed for robust rules guaranteeing their safety and that of those persons who choose to speak out.”
The new standards will apply to all private companies with more than 50 employees or with an annual turnover of more than 10 million euros, about $11.2 million; all state and regional agencies; and all local municipalities with more than 10,000 residents.
The entities covered by the law will have to ensure that they have established systems to receive confidential whistleblower reports in writing or over the phone and acknowledge receipt of a report within seven days, according to Ramey. He said companies also have to generate confirmation report numbers and keys or pin codes for each whistleblower notification they receive.
Whistleblower reporting systems can cost a few thousand dollars for small businesses or hundreds of thousands of dollars for global companies, Ramey said.
“If I'm the general counsel or chief compliance officer of one of these companies, I want one of these [systems] because I want a reporter who has a legitimate issue, an issue that I need to be thinking about from a compliance or good business standpoint, to have the easiest path in reporting that,” he said.
He added that when it's difficult or risky to report concerns internally, whistleblowers tend to look for help outside the company, which can prove costly for a business.
“You as a company do not want to be litigating this in the public forum,” Ramey said.
Read More:
Community College Sues AIG for Revoking Coverage of Whistleblower Lawsuit
Company Settles Whistleblower Case That Led to Former DOJ Lawyer's Jailing
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllStatute of Limitations Shrivels $5M Jury Award to Less than $1M, 8th Circuit Rules
4 minute readRead the Document: DOJ Releases Ex-Special Counsel's Report Explaining Trump Prosecutions
3 minute readArizona Board Gives Thumbs Up to KPMG's Bid To Deliver Legal Services
Goodwin to Launch Brussels Office With Quinn Emanuel Antitrust Partner
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Snapshot Judgement: The Case Against Illustrated Indictments
- 2Texas Supreme Court Grapples Over Fifth Circuit Question on State Usury Law
- 3Exploring the Opportunities and Risks for Generative AI and Corporate Databases: An Introduction
- 4Farella Elevates First Female Firmwide Managing Partners
- 5Family Court 2024 Roundup: Part I
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250