What Do Cannabis Companies Look for in In-House Attorneys?
Those in the industry say that while cannabis law expertise is important, those with a corporate background to help the expansion of their companies will be among the first offered jobs for the in-house legal department.
April 22, 2019 at 07:02 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Corporate Counsel
Photo: Shutterstock
Having direct experience in the cannabis industry may help with getting a job in the legal department at an expanding cannabis company, but experts say it takes more than industry knowledge.
In March, Mike Evers, the founder of Evers Legal Search, was contracted to help Chicago-based Grassroots Cannabis find its first general counsel. Usually, Evers explained, he gets a middle-of-the-road response with attorneys wanting to learn more about the specific role. However, the lawyers he has approached for the position have either been excited at the prospect of helping expand the industry or showing they do not believe in cannabis legalization.
"People are self-identifying right away," Evers explained.
A number of attorneys at firms are familiar with the changing cannabis laws, Evers said.
"The right person to run these new legal departments are going to be generalists with corporate backgrounds," he said. "What I learned once I dove in is that they're [Grassroots Cannabis] not looking for an industry expert."
He explained that at the general counsel level the successful candidate will likely already be a general counsel of a publicly traded company or in the legal department working close to the general counsel.
Many of the legal departments for these expanding companies are small and may grow only depending on how the company grows.
Jean Gonnell, who was recently hired as the second general counsel for Strainwise Consulting in Colorado, said right now she is the company's only in-house attorney. However, she does plan on hiring in the future.
"I'd prefer to keep it small for now," Gonnell said of the size of her legal department. "It depends on when things change and Strainwise is expanding. The department needs to expand with the company."
Matt Miller, the general counsel of Green Thumb Industries Inc. in Chicago, said there are two other in-house attorneys at the company and the legal department is hiring. He said he is not sure of the size of the legal department he wants to create.
"Given the complexities of what we do and our company's continued growth, it is important that our legal team is staffed with the right number of lawyers and has the right mix of skills to always be one step ahead of everyone else," Miller said in an email to Corporate Counsel.
Gonnell said she plans on hiring people with corporate experience, regardless of industry, though she is not likely to consider attorneys who have a criminal defense background.
"The transfer from criminal defense to civil administrative law is very difficult," Gonnell explained.
Regulatory and business experience will be necessary for an in-house attorney at a cannabis company since the legal or illegal use of medical and/or recreational cannabis is governed on the municipal, state and federal levels. California, for example, allows medical and adult recreational use of cannabis, but some cities and counties have limited or banned dispensaries while a lawsuit against the state's cannabis control department over deliveries was recently filed.
Miller said as far as recruiting for his own department he tries to keep an open mind by not excluding lawyers from consideration who practice in a particular industry. He did say, however, the stereotypical risk-averse attorneys may not be able to thrive in the cannabis industry.
"Regardless of the industry, if your background demonstrates that you can be comfortable with the uncomfortable, and that you thrive under pressure, then we should talk," Miller said. "I suppose if your entire background shows a gravitation towards very hierarchical and structured work environments where it takes 10 meetings to make a decision and 14 committees to execute on that decision, that might be a problem, but other than that, I want to find the best people, period."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All![Securities Report Says That 2024 Settlements Passed a Total of $5.2B Securities Report Says That 2024 Settlements Passed a Total of $5.2B](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/delbizcourt/contrib/content/uploads/sites/399/2023/05/securities-litigation-767x633.jpg)
Securities Report Says That 2024 Settlements Passed a Total of $5.2B
3 minute read![Trump's DOJ Delays Releasing Jan. 6 FBI Agents List Under Consent Order Trump's DOJ Delays Releasing Jan. 6 FBI Agents List Under Consent Order](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/nationallawjournal/contrib/content/uploads/sites/398/2024/05/US-Department-of-Justice-Building-2022-006-767x633-8.jpg)
Trump's DOJ Delays Releasing Jan. 6 FBI Agents List Under Consent Order
3 minute read![Investor Sues in New York to Block $175M Bitcoin Merger Investor Sues in New York to Block $175M Bitcoin Merger](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/f0/03/89d810cb48599bcaa9582fe55e0e/side-view-of-supreme-court-at-60-center-street-new-york-767x633.jpg)
![Landlord Must Pay Prevailing Tenants' $21K Attorney Fees in Commercial Lease Dispute, Appellate Court Rules Landlord Must Pay Prevailing Tenants' $21K Attorney Fees in Commercial Lease Dispute, Appellate Court Rules](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/389/2024/07/lease-agreement-767x633.jpg)
Landlord Must Pay Prevailing Tenants' $21K Attorney Fees in Commercial Lease Dispute, Appellate Court Rules
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Big Law's Middle East Bet: Will It Pay Off?
- 2'Translate Across Disciplines': Paul Hastings’ New Tech Transactions Leader
- 3Milbank’s Revenue and Profits Surge Following Demand Increases Across the Board
- 4Fourth Quarter Growth in Demand and Worked Rates Coincided with Countercyclical Dip, New Report Indicates
- 5Public Notices/Calendars
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250