J&J Pays $9.9M to Settle Pelvic Mesh Case Brought by Washington AG
Washington Attorney General Bob Ferguson announced the settlement on what was to be the first day of trial in Seattle.
April 22, 2019 at 06:49 PM
4 minute read
Johnson & Johnson's Ethicon Inc. unit has agreed to pay nearly $10 million to Washington Attorney General Bob Ferguson to settle the first lawsuit brought by a state over its transvaginal mesh devices.
The $9.9 million settlement, announced just as the trial was set to begin Monday in Seattle, sets up a claims process that compensates women who had pelvic mesh devices surgically implanted in them. It also prohibits Johnson & Johnson from making false or deceptive statements about the risks of its mesh products.
“Johnson & Johnson's knowing deception caused Washington women to suffer in deeply personal ways,” Ferguson said in a press release Monday. “I'm proud of my team for holding a powerful interest accountable for its egregious conduct—and look forward to providing millions of dollars in relief to assist those who were harmed.”
Ethicon has faced numerous trials and settled thousands of cases brought by women alleging that the devices, which treat incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse, caused pain during sex and urinary problems that, in most cases, required surgical removal. Verdicts have reached as high as $57.1 million, but Ethicon also has won some trials.
Washington is one of four states that have sued over transvaginal mesh devices. Another case, brought against Ethicon by California Attorney General Xavier Becerra, starts July 12 in San Diego County Superior Court. The states of Mississippi and Kentucky also have sued.
Monday's trial was expected to last five weeks.
According to a trial brief filed in King County Superior Court, lawyers for the state had planned to argue that Ethicon's product brochures misrepresented the safety of the devices to doctors. Ethicon also allegedly promoted sales of the devices through marketing to patients.
Ferguson's office, which handled the case without outside counsel, had asked for disgorgement of at least $16.7 million in net revenues that Ethicon earned from the sale of the devices to 14,000 women in Washington, plus statutory damages of up to $2,000 per violation under Washington's Consumer Protection Act.
Ethicon had brought in Seattle's Calfo Eakes & Ostrovsky—in particular, Patty Eakes and Angelo Calfo—as well as Butler Snow's William Gage, a partner in Jacksonville, Mississippi; Carolyn Kubota, a partner at Covington & Burling in Los Angeles; and Steve Brody, head of the product liability and mass torts practice at O'Melveny & Myers, where he is a partner in Washington, D.C.
“Ethicon is pleased to have reached a settlement with the Washington state attorney general to resolve the pending litigation,” wrote Johnson & Johnson spokeswoman Mindy Tinsley. “Ethicon's devices for treatment of incontinence are recognized as the standard of care by surgeons and medical professional societies in Washington and around the world. Any contrary allegations are at odds with the views of leading doctors and medical groups, as well as the FDA.”
In its trial brief, Ethicon had insisted that doctors were aware of the risks of the products, and, furthermore, relied on their own medical judgment, not just product brochures, to determine whether to recommend them to their patients.
Ethicon had received support from an unusual group: doctors. On Dec. 9, Ferguson received a letter from 63 surgeons in the state of Washington, including three retained by Ethicon in the case, insisting that he drop the lawsuit. The letter said doctors do not look at just the “instructions for use” on pamphlets to determine the risks associated with medical devices.
“It is astonishing to us that the AG is proceeding with this lawsuit without first availing themselves of the significant experience and expertise of this group,” they wrote.
Tinsley, in her statement about today's settlement, recognized their support.
“We appreciate the advocacy of the Washington State medical community, many of whom publicly disagreed with the allegations in this lawsuit and supported maintaining options for patients who suffer with the debilitating effects of stress urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse,” she wrote.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'New Circumstances': Winston & Strawn Seek Expedited Relief in NASCAR Antitrust Lawsuit
3 minute readConsumer Cleared to Proceed With Claims Against CVS 'Non-Drowsy' Medication, Judge Says
4 minute read'Water Cooler Discussions': US Judge Questions DOJ Request in Google Search Case
3 minute readDivided State Court Reinstates Dispute Over Replacement Vehicles Fees
5 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250