J&J Pays $9.9M to Settle Pelvic Mesh Case Brought by Washington AG
Washington Attorney General Bob Ferguson announced the settlement on what was to be the first day of trial in Seattle.
April 22, 2019 at 06:49 PM
4 minute read
Johnson & Johnson's Ethicon Inc. unit has agreed to pay nearly $10 million to Washington Attorney General Bob Ferguson to settle the first lawsuit brought by a state over its transvaginal mesh devices.
The $9.9 million settlement, announced just as the trial was set to begin Monday in Seattle, sets up a claims process that compensates women who had pelvic mesh devices surgically implanted in them. It also prohibits Johnson & Johnson from making false or deceptive statements about the risks of its mesh products.
“Johnson & Johnson's knowing deception caused Washington women to suffer in deeply personal ways,” Ferguson said in a press release Monday. “I'm proud of my team for holding a powerful interest accountable for its egregious conduct—and look forward to providing millions of dollars in relief to assist those who were harmed.”
Ethicon has faced numerous trials and settled thousands of cases brought by women alleging that the devices, which treat incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse, caused pain during sex and urinary problems that, in most cases, required surgical removal. Verdicts have reached as high as $57.1 million, but Ethicon also has won some trials.
Washington is one of four states that have sued over transvaginal mesh devices. Another case, brought against Ethicon by California Attorney General Xavier Becerra, starts July 12 in San Diego County Superior Court. The states of Mississippi and Kentucky also have sued.
Monday's trial was expected to last five weeks.
According to a trial brief filed in King County Superior Court, lawyers for the state had planned to argue that Ethicon's product brochures misrepresented the safety of the devices to doctors. Ethicon also allegedly promoted sales of the devices through marketing to patients.
Ferguson's office, which handled the case without outside counsel, had asked for disgorgement of at least $16.7 million in net revenues that Ethicon earned from the sale of the devices to 14,000 women in Washington, plus statutory damages of up to $2,000 per violation under Washington's Consumer Protection Act.
Ethicon had brought in Seattle's Calfo Eakes & Ostrovsky—in particular, Patty Eakes and Angelo Calfo—as well as Butler Snow's William Gage, a partner in Jacksonville, Mississippi; Carolyn Kubota, a partner at Covington & Burling in Los Angeles; and Steve Brody, head of the product liability and mass torts practice at O'Melveny & Myers, where he is a partner in Washington, D.C.
“Ethicon is pleased to have reached a settlement with the Washington state attorney general to resolve the pending litigation,” wrote Johnson & Johnson spokeswoman Mindy Tinsley. “Ethicon's devices for treatment of incontinence are recognized as the standard of care by surgeons and medical professional societies in Washington and around the world. Any contrary allegations are at odds with the views of leading doctors and medical groups, as well as the FDA.”
In its trial brief, Ethicon had insisted that doctors were aware of the risks of the products, and, furthermore, relied on their own medical judgment, not just product brochures, to determine whether to recommend them to their patients.
Ethicon had received support from an unusual group: doctors. On Dec. 9, Ferguson received a letter from 63 surgeons in the state of Washington, including three retained by Ethicon in the case, insisting that he drop the lawsuit. The letter said doctors do not look at just the “instructions for use” on pamphlets to determine the risks associated with medical devices.
“It is astonishing to us that the AG is proceeding with this lawsuit without first availing themselves of the significant experience and expertise of this group,” they wrote.
Tinsley, in her statement about today's settlement, recognized their support.
“We appreciate the advocacy of the Washington State medical community, many of whom publicly disagreed with the allegations in this lawsuit and supported maintaining options for patients who suffer with the debilitating effects of stress urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse,” she wrote.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllApple Files Appeal to DC Circuit Aiming to Intervene in Google Search Monopoly Case
3 minute readA Plan Is Brewing to Limit Big-Dollar Suits in Georgia—and Lawyers Have Mixed Feelings
10 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250