Critical Mass: No Outside Funding in Marriott Data Breach Litigation, Plaintiffs' Lawyers Pledge. Plus: AG Settles Mesh Case on Day 1 of Trial
Every lawyer representing plaintiffs in the massive data breach has told the Maryland federal judge in charge of the matter--who demanded to know about sources of money for lawyers mounting the case--that they won't accept third-party funding
April 24, 2019 at 02:01 PM
6 minute read
Welcome to Critical Mass, Law.com's weekly briefing for class action and mass tort attorneys. Here's what's happening this week: The judge overseeing the Marriott data breach cases wants to know about litigation financiers, but lawyers insist they've checked out. Johnson & Johnson reached a $9.9 million settlement in the first case brought to trial by a state AG over trans-vaginal mesh. Find out which firms are representing members of the Sackler family, which owns privately-held Purdue Pharma, in opioid litigation.
Send your feedback to [email protected], or find me on Twitter: @abronstadlaw
Lawyers Vow to Self-Finance Marriott Data Breach Litigation
Lawyers are lining up to lead the lawsuits filed over Marriott's massive data breach. More than 30 applications poured in last week, including four proposed slates of attorneys and several individual submissions by women citing the need for a diverse leadership team. A hearing is set for April 29.
It's a big case, and data breaches are big business for class action attorneys, according to a recent Carlton Fields survey.
Perhaps that's why U.S. District Paul Grimm for the District of Maryland ordered on April 11 that plaintiffs' lawyers disclose how they plan to finance their work, including the role that third party litigation funders might play in “litigation strategy and settlement discussions” (see his order here). Every single lawyer responded that they wouldn't accept outside funding.
Other judges have asked about outside litigation funding, of course, but not in as much detail. In the multidistrict litigation over NFL-related concussions, co-lead counsel Chris Seeger (Seeger Weiss) was forced to disclose he was a director of Esquire Bank after he criticized other litigation funding companies.
John Morgan (Morgan & Morgan), also was on the Esquire Bank board as of the end of 2018, according to the annual report it filed on March 14 with the SEC.
It was John Yanchunis, Morgan's firm colleague, who filed the first Marriott suithours after the company's Nov. 30 announcement. Yanchunis is also part of a proposed slate of attorneys applying to lead the Marriott cases. Yanchunis is part of the slate of attorneys who vowed not to use third party litigation funding.
According to an email from Esquire Bank CEO Andrew Saggliocca, Morgan is no longer on the board as of March of this year.
Morgan & Morgan partners had no comment for the record on John Morgan's former relationship with the bank.
Johnson & Johnson Settles First State AG Case Over Mesh
Johnson & Johnson's Ethicon Inc. agreed to pay $9.9 million on Monday to settle the first case brought by a state attorney general over transvaginal mesh devices.
Washington Attorney General Bob Ferguson announced the settlement on what was supposed to be the first day of trial. Trial is set to commence on July 12 in a similar case against Ethicon brought by California Attorney General Xavier Becerra.
Ethicon had a formidable defense team: Patty Eakes and Angelo Calfo (Calfo Eakes & Ostrovsky), William Gage (Butler Snow), Carolyn Kubota (Covington & Burling) and Steve Brody (O'Melveny & Myers).
That's something Ferguson mentioned at a press conference on Monday: “As you might imagine, they have all the resources money can buy to represent them. That is their right, of course, but it's a big undertaking to take on an entity of that size in a case as complex as this on behalf of many thousands of Washington state women and especially to prepare for a trial, which would have lasted some time.”
He also provided other reasons for settling. Unlike a verdict, which would have provided statutory penalties to the state, the settlement sets up a claims processthat allows potentially hundreds of women in Washington to get compensation. Ferguson also encouraged women to hire a lawyer to do something he can't: sue over their injuries, including pain and suffering.
|
Who Got the Work?
The newest defendants to be sued over the opioid crisis — the Sackler family, owners of Purdue Pharma, one of the primary manufacturers of the prescription painkillers — have retained several law firms. Reuters reported on Monday that Mary Jo White(Debevoise & Plimpton) represents four Sackler family members. Those four are related to Mortimer Sackler, one of two brothers behind the development of Purdue's OxyContin. The other brother is Raymond Sackler, whose family members are represented by David Bernick (Paul Weiss) and Greg Joseph (Joseph Hage Aaronson). White told Reuters that the Sacklers are insisting on a global settlement of the cases, but they filed motions to dismiss the Massachusetts attorney general's case earlier this month. Robert Cordy (McDermott Will & Emery) is leading a Boston-based defense team for the Sacklers in that case.
Here's what else you need to know:
Naming Names: After sanctioning Aimee Wagstaff (Andrus Wagstaff) for what he termed “obvious violations” of pretrial orders in the first federal Roundup trial, U.S. District Judge Vince Chhabria ordered her to provide a list of names of all the other attorneys who worked on her opening statement. Last week, she did just that, identifying six lawyers by name while emphasizing that she had “ultimate decision making responsibility” as to trial strategy.
Bitter Departure: The Beasley Firm has filed a lawsuit over more than $500,000 in fees it claims Kennerly Loutey principals Max Kennerly and Kim Loutey owed from work they did on the Actos litigation. Both previously worked at The Beasley Firm as associates. Jim Beasley Jr. filed the suit, which stems from a settlement reached with Kennerly and Loutey before they left in 2015.
Butter Battle: A plaintiff suing over the trans fat labeling of butter alternative Benecol lost a bid to certify her class action after defendants McNeil Nutritionalsand its parent company, Johnson & Johnson, questioned the credibility of her claims – and the judge agreed. Plaintiff Suzanna Bowling alleged she purchased a tub of Benecol in 2011 at a Walmart in White Plains, New York, but defense attorneys Richard Goetz and Carlos Lazatin (O'Melveny) found no records of such a purchase. They also argued that Bowling, repped by Scott Bursor (Bursor & Fisher), was barred from suing under a settlement she had with the same defendants in a separate case over Listerine.
Thanks for reading Critical Mass! See you next week.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 15th Circuit Rules Open-Source Code Is Not Property in Tornado Cash Appeal
- 2Mediators for the Southern District of New York Honored at Eighth Annual James Duane Awards
- 3The Lawyers Picked by Trump for Key Roles in His Second Term
- 4Pa. High Court to Weigh Parent Company's Liability for Dissolved Subsidiary's Conduct
- 5Depo-Provera MDL Could Be Headed to California
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250