The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority collected $61 million in fines last year, a 6% dip from $65 million collected in 2017. The broker-dealer self-regulator allocated $9.7 million of the 2018 fine money to overhaul its registration and disclosure programs, including the Central Registration Depository system, and to launch its new Securities Industry Essentials exam.
This is the second year that FINRA has shared how its fine monies are spent.
"It's good to see that FINRA is continuing with the transparency that it established last year," Brian Rubin, partner at Eversheds Sutherland, told ThinkAdvisor on Thursday. "I'm sure firms will be heartened to see that FINRA is using fines, in part, to help firms comply with rules and to educate investors. Firms may, however, question FINRA using fines to pay for enforcement tools that may help FINRA bring more cases and assess higher fines."
(Related: FINRA Launches New Fintech Office)
The FINRA Board determined that there were $81.1 million in fines-eligible expenditures in 2018.
"Because the total of fines-eligible expenditures exceeded the amount of fines issued in 2018, the balance of $20.1 million was funded from FINRA's reserves," the regulator said.
FINRA said that it uses fine money on capital initiatives or nonrecurring strategic expenditures that promote more effective and efficient regulatory oversight by FINRA — including leveraging technology and data in a secure manner or to improve BDs' compliance as well as on education and training.
Other project spending in 2018 included:
- $16 million to migrate various technology applications from existing FINRA-managed data centers to cloud-based platforms;
- $11.8 million to enhance the sophisticated computer programs or "patterns" used to detect a wide variety of compliance issues and suspicious conduct across markets;
- $5.8 million to implement and ongoing support for the reporting of trades in Treasury securities to FINRA's Trade Reporting and Compliance Engine, or TRACE, as well as FINRA's surveillance of the Treasuries market;
- $2.0 million to comply with the Consolidated Audit Trail, or CAT, the SEC-mandated system to track orders throughout their life cycle and identify the broker-dealers handling them;
- $1.8 million on trade transparency systems;
- $8.5 million to enhance the technology that supports the exam and risk monitoring platform;
- $2.0 million to update tools used to manage work efficiently under the new, unified enforcement structure;
- $1.5 million to enhance FINRA's data analytics program on business models and industry relationships, trading activity and disciplinary history; and
- $3.5 million was invested in various investor education programs, including enhancing BrokerCheck.
— Related on ThinkAdvisor:
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250