Joe Biden Is Everyman—and That's the Problem
Not only was the presidential candidate's "apology" to Anita Hill unconvincing, but it highlighted how male leaders are essentially clueless about what women deal with in the workplace and the world at large.
April 28, 2019 at 05:20 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The American Lawyer
I've been rather agnostic whether it's time for a female president until Joe Biden announced his run for the presidency. Then, all of a sudden, it hit me: I'm done with looking up to old white men.
I didn't expect to make such a blanket statement, but Biden was the tipping point.
He's not a bad guy (though that Average Joe thing doesn't charm everybody), but his recent apology to Anita Hill drove me over the edge. Not only was it unconvincing, but it highlighted how male leaders are essentially clueless about what women deal with in the workplace and the world at large. Simply put: You can't teach old goats new tricks.
First, about that Biden apology to Hill: What's the point of waiting 28 years to say you're sorry? (Biden called Hill a month ago to apologize for the way he mishandled her testimony during the 1991 confirmation hearings for Clarence Thomas to the Supreme Court. Then chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee, Biden allowed Republicans to trash Hill's character—remember how former Utah Senator Orrin Hatch waved a copy of The Exorcist, suggesting that Hill was possessed?—and halted the testimony of other witnesses who were scheduled to corroborate Hill's accusation's of sexual harassment by Thomas.)
And second, didn't it seem tacky for him to finally apologize on the eve of his announcement to run for the presidency? It looks like Biden's contrition has more to do with his political agenda than self-reflection.
You can't blame Hill for not embracing Biden. She told the New York Times, “I cannot be satisfied by simply saying, 'I'm sorry for what happened to you.' ” In that interview, she refused to call Biden's words “ an apology and said she was not convinced that he has taken full responsibility for his conduct at the hearings—or for the harm he caused other victims of sexual harassment and gender violence.”
Indeed, Biden seems to have taken a strangely distant stance in the apology, talking about “what happened to you,” rather than how his actions created consequences.
And on the talk show, The View, in which he appeared after news of the apology came out, Biden again refused to take direct responsibility. At one point Joy Behar said to him about Hill: “I think she wants you to say 'I'm sorry for the way I treated you, not for the way you were treated.' ” But Biden answered: “ But I'm sorry the way she got treated. I never heard—if you go back and look at what I said and I didn't say, I don't think I treated her badly. I took on her opposition.”
While it's probably true that Biden wouldn't have handled the hearings the same way in the post #MeToo era, it's unclear how much he's really learned. Judging from his abstract apologies, including those about his touchy-feely ways, I think there's a limit to his empathy—which is probably why he's that bungling Everyman of his era.
Biden's critics are now saying that he needs to do a more full-throated apology—take responsibility, acknowledge how his actions diminished women who make charges of sexual harassment and enabled the elevation of a Supreme Court justice who's hostile to women's rights.
Hill also told the New York Times: “The focus on apology, to me, is one thing. But he needs to give an apology to the other women and to the American public because we know now how deeply disappointed Americans around the country were about what they saw.”
I say why bother? The apology ship sailed long ago. Biden is who he is–a decent, if inept, leader who doesn't quite get it. He's an anachronism best left by the wayside.
Contact Vivia Chen at [email protected]. On Twitter: @lawcareerist.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFired by Trump, EEOC's First Blind GC Lands at Nonprofit Targeting Abuses of Power
3 minute read'Erroneous Rulings'?: Wilmer Asks 4th Circuit to Overturn Mosby's Criminal Convictions
3 minute readLSU General Counsel Quits Amid Fracas Over First Amendment Rights of Law Professor
7 minute readZoom Faces Intellectual Property Suit Over AI-Based Augmented Video Conferencing
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Carol-Lisa Phillips to Rise to Broward Chief Judge as Jack Tuter Weighs Next Move
- 2Data Breaches in UK Legal Sector Surge, According to ICO Data
- 3Georgia Law Schools Seeing 24% More Applicants This Year
- 4After Shutting USAID, Trump Eyes Department of Education, CFPB
- 5‘Keep Men Out’: Female Swimmers Sue Ivy Leagues Over Lia Thomas’ Sweep
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250