China's Fintech Market Sputters Amid Tighter Regulations
A new report finds that fintech investment in Asia plummeted from more than $2.6 billion in the fourth quarter of 2018 to $875 million, a 67% decline. During that same time, fintech deals in China slipped from 49 to 29 and fintech funding fell by nearly 90% from the prior quarter to $192 million.
May 01, 2019 at 02:56 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Corporate Counsel
China's crackdown on online lending has caused a dramatic decline in venture capital-backed funding for financial technology in Asia, which has dropped below $1 billion for the first time in the past five quarters, according to a new global fintech report from CB Insights.
The New York-based big data company found that fintech investment in Asia plummeted from more than $2.6 billion in the fourth quarter of 2018 to $875 million, a 67% decline. During that same time, fintech deals in China slipped from 49 to 29 and fintech funding fell by nearly 90% from the prior quarter to $192 million.
With tighter regulations hamstringing many lenders in China, India appears to be emerging as a top fintech market in Asia. India matched China's fintech deals this past quarter and surpassed its fintech funding by nearly $100 million.
“India is a jurisdiction where the sector is catching up. Given their currency inflation and issues that have plagued India over the last two years, everyone is embracing this notion that digital assets, fintech, that's something better than what they've had,” Huhnsik Chung, a partner at Stroock & Stroock & Lavan in New York who has clients in the fintech industry, said in an interview Wednesday.
Chinese authorities announced in February that they were investigating hundreds of online or peer-to-peer lenders and had seized $1.5 billion in assets following widespread complaints about corruption within the industry, according to a report from The Associated Press.
Chung added he believes China is tightening the regulatory reins on lenders as it seeks to stem what has been a “tremendous outflow of money into Hong Kong and Singapore.”
“The monetary policies are geared toward stopping it,” he said.
Chung also noted that Asian regulators “are not recognizing digital ownership rights as opposed to the traditional certificates representing ownership of asset-backed paper,” unlike the U.S., which has comparatively robust cryptocurrency regulations.
“The view that the U.S. is falling behind the rest of the world, that clearly may not be the case,” he said.
During the first quarter of 2019, the U.S. saw $3.3 billion in fintech funding, compared with $1.7 billion in Europe and $874 million in Asia, according to the CB Insights report. Fintech deals in the U.S. totaled 170, a rebound after three consecutive quarters of declines.
In Europe, which topped Asia in fintech funding for the first time in the past five quarters, the U.K. emerged as the star market with investments of $645 million in 42 deals. Germany followed the U.K. with $588 million in 15 deals.
Read More:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllUS Judge Rejects Morgan Stanley Reconsideration Bid in Deferred Compensation Litigation
Transgender Woman Awarded $150K Default Judgment Against Corrections Officer for Alleged Assault
Legal Speak: A Convicted Felon is Coming to the White House. What Happens Now?
1 minute readAT&T General Counsel Joins ADM Board as Company Reels From Accounting Scandal
Trending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Trump's Return to the White House: The Legal Industry Reacts
- 3Election 2024: Nationwide Judicial Races and Ballot Measures to Watch
- 4Climate Disputes, International Arbitration, and State Court Limitations for Global Issues
- 5Judicial Face-Off: Navigating the Ethical and Efficient Use of AI in Legal Practice [CLE Pending]
- 6How Much Does the Frequency of Retirement Withdrawals Matter?
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250