John Roberts Who? 'Troubling Gaps' in Civics Literacy, ABA Study Shows
A mere 5 percent of the 1,000 people recently surveyed by the American Bar Association correctly answered all 15 questions about U.S. civics. The questions were pulled from the U.S. citizenship exam.
May 01, 2019 at 01:48 PM
3 minute read
It seems that a wide swath of Americans could use a refresher on Civics 101.
Less than half of the 1,000 people recently surveyed by the American Bar Association on civic literacy—49%—correctly named John Roberts as the chief justice of the U.S. Supreme Court. Try not to be offended, James Madison, but 18% said the first 10 amendments to the U.S. Constitution, your handiwork, are called the Declaration of Independence instead of the Bill of Rights. (6% identified them as the Ten Commandments). And slightly less than three-quarters correctly identified the president as the commander-in-chief of the military.
Taken together, the results reveal “troubling gaps in [the U.S. public's] knowledge of American history and government, as well as constitutional rights,” according to an ABA report released May 1, which is also Law Day. This year's theme is “Free Speech, Free Press, Free Society.”
The ABA conducted the survey in February and March, and it consisted of 15 questions drawn from 100 possible questions on the test taken by those seeking to become U.S. citizens. Only 5% of respondents answered all 15 questions correctly. Among the responses:
- 95% correctly identified the U.S. Supreme Court as the nation's highest court. 49% said Roberts is the chief justice; 23% said it is Ruth Bader Ginsburg; and 16% said it's Clarence Thomas.
- Most respondents—78%—correctly said that the term “the rule of law” means that no one is above the law. However, 15% said the term means the law is always right.
- 89% of those surveyed correctly said that “We the People” are the first three words of the U.S. Constitution, and 93% knew that the Senate and House of Representatives are the two chambers of Congress. But only 61% correctly responded that the speaker of the House becomes president in the event that the president and vice president cannot serve.
ABA president Bob Carlson said in an interview that the organization wanted a baseline of Americans' civic literacy in order to gauge how it can best help improve that area of knowledge.
“What programming we can do? What discussions can we have with teachers and the public about what they should be familiar with and aware of?” Carlson said. “We need to have that conversation on the public level that is based on facts and not rumor.”
The ABA also asked respondents about their views on the First Amendment and found widespread support for a free press and free speech. Among those surveyed, 81% said people should be able to publicly criticize government leaders, and 75% said the government should not be able to stop the media from reporting on political protests. Most respondents—80%—agreed that individuals and organizations should have access to government records and information.
But there is significant confusion over what, exactly, the First Amendment protects. Nearly one in five said the First Amendment does not enshrine the freedom of the press, and more than half said it does not protect the right to burn a U.S. flag during a protest.
“Democracy is not a spectator sport, but to participate, you need to know the rules,” Carlson said. “That's too important to leave to chance.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'What Is Certain Is Uncertainty': Patchwork Title IX Rules Face Expected Changes in Second Trump Administration
5 minute read'No Evidence'?: Big Law Firms Defend Academic Publishers in EDNY Antitrust Case
3 minute readLaw Firms Are Turning to Online Training Platforms as Apprenticeship Model Falters
'Substantive Deficiencies': Judge Grants Big Law Motion Dismissing Ivy League Price-Fixing Claims
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Trump's Return to the White House: The Legal Industry Reacts
- 3Election 2024: Nationwide Judicial Races and Ballot Measures to Watch
- 4Climate Disputes, International Arbitration, and State Court Limitations for Global Issues
- 5Judicial Face-Off: Navigating the Ethical and Efficient Use of AI in Legal Practice [CLE Pending]
- 6How Much Does the Frequency of Retirement Withdrawals Matter?
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250