EU Proposes Ambitious WTO E-Commerce Rules, Opposition Expected
The U.S. and China are expected to oppose certain aspects of the EU proposal.
May 03, 2019 at 01:22 PM
3 minute read
The European Union has put forth an ambitious proposal for how countries can eliminate barriers to e-commerce and protect businesses and consumers engaged in online transactions. But parts of the proposal, published Friday as part of a World Trade Organization initiative that includes the U.S. and China, are likely to face opposition.
The list includes a commitment to keeping electronic services free of duties, calls for net neutrality and demands that countries stop requiring access to source code.
The increasing digitalization of the economy and the growth of e-commerce has created problems in both developed and developing countries, as currently there are no multilateral rules regulating digital commerce. Businesses and consumers instead have to rely on a patchwork of rules agreed by some countries in their bilateral or regional trade agreements.
An EU official said the aim is to “increase trust of consumers and businesses” in doing business via the internet.
The goal is to reach an e-commerce agreement that would be adopted by the 76 WTO member countries taking part in the negotiations. It would then apply to all 164 WTO members. But the negotiations, which begin later this month, are expected to be difficult.
“There will be a lot of sticking points,” said one EU official, speaking on condition of anonymity.
The initiative was launched at the World Economic Forum meeting in Davos in January and taken up by 76 WTO members, including the EU, the U.S., China, Nigeria, Japan, Australia, Singapore and Hong Kong.
The EU wants legal guarantees that electronic signatures will be accepted for all electronic transactions, ending the need for paper documentation. It also wants to make permanent an existing temporary agreement not to apply duties on electronic transactions.
In addition, the EU wants to put an end to a requirement by some countries that companies grant access to software source code. An official said that such requirements were often used to pressure companies to reveal commercial secrets or for protectionist purposes.
The deal also should include measures to prevent spam, the trade bloc said.
Other demands relate to telecommunications services. The bloc wants parties to agree to net neutrality principles so that small businesses can also take advantage of global opportunities.
It also is asking that parties commit themselves to the independence of regulators and that they ensure fair access to radio frequencies.
An EU official said that other parties in the negotiations found the bloc's proposals “too ambitious.”
He said the EU had deliberately chosen a narrow range of e-commerce services, mainly those in the telecommunications sector, for its proposal.
The EU's proposal will be discussed at a meeting at the WTO in Geneva on May 13-15. Additional meetings will take place before the summer break. The officials said there is hope that progress could be made later this year.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllUS Reviewer of Foreign Transactions Sees More Political, Policy Influence, Say Observers
Delaware Supreme Court Adopts Broad Interpretation of Case Law on Anticompetition Provisions
3 minute readThe Week in Data Dec. 19: A Look at Legal Industry Trends by the Numbers
Davis Polk Moves to New, Expanded Redwood City Office
Trending Stories
- 1Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 2Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 3Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
- 4Husch Blackwell, Foley Among Law Firms Opening Southeast Offices This Year
- 5In Lawsuit, Ex-Google Employee Says Company’s Layoffs Targeted Parents and Others on Leave
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250