Opportunity Zone Funds: It's Complicated
New proposed rules from the IRS clarify many questions investors had, but other questions remain.
May 06, 2019 at 10:08 AM
6 minute read
Investment VIPsThe original version of this story was published on Law.com
Investing in an opportunity fund is more complicated than many financial advisors might realize even after the Treasury Department announced its second set of proposed regulations, which were just published in the Federal Register on Friday.
"When the law first came out I was really excited," says Chris Cordaro, chief investment officer of RegentAtlantic, an RIA based in Morristown, New Jersey. "Everywhere we have clients with liquidity events or just capital gains in their portfolio."
Investors can defer that gain when they invest in an opportunity zone fund within 180 days, and the gain is reduced by 10% if the investment is held for five years and by 15% if held for seven years.
The gains from the investment in an opportunity zone get even more favorable treatment. If the investment is held for 10 years, the gains are tax-free (They're cut by 10% if held for five years and by 15% if held for seven years).
Those tax benefits "translate into real savings because if you hold the investment for 10 years and it's a reasonable investment you're saving somewhere between 2% and 3% a year," Cordaro continues.
Opportunity Zone Requirements
"But when you dig deeper into the regulations you realize to qualify for the opportunity zone investment …," Cordaro said, "you've got to … have a substantial increase in the basis, which everyone takes to be double the basis … So if you buy a building for $1 million — $250,000 was for the land and $750,000 is for the building — you have to improve the building by $750,000. That's the kicker.
"Now you're asking a real estate developer to hold onto a property for 10 years. That's not what they do. Developers develop a property and then sell it to a core portfolio. … It's complicated, and you need a real estate investor that has both parts of that — does development and holds onto core portfolios. … That's why it's become difficult to find an investment that's worthwhile."
Cordaro did find one opportunity zone fund to invest in for a client but says he "kissed a lot of frogs" beforehand.
There are a growing number of opportunity zone funds being formed for investments throughout the U.S. — there are roughly 8,700 tracts designated as opportunity zones. Novogradac, a national accounting firm that emphasizes services for the real estate sector, lists 123 opportunity zone funds on its website representing more than $27 billion in community development investing capacity.
Most funds currently focus on real estate, but the latest proposed rules from the U.S. Treasury pave the way for investments in other businesses operating in the zones. They allow businesses to qualify for the 50% gross income requirement if half of the company's employee hours or wages are sourced in the zone or if its tangible property and management or operational functions performed in the zone are each necessary to generate 50% of its gross income.
"The second set of rules provides flexibility for the operating companies and will help bring jobs to the areas," says Martin Muoto, founder and CEO of SoLa Impact Fund, which invests in the distressed neighborhoods in South Los Angeles and is raising funds for a $100 million opportunity zone fund that invests similarly.
The second set of proposed rules also clarified that a fund that invests at least 90% of its assets in qualified opportunity zone properties — which is a requirement — will not lose its tax-advantaged status if it sells qualified property, stock or partnership interests in the fund so long as it reinvests the proceeds in another qualified property within 12 months.
"This provides a lot of clarity and ample room to do things," said Neil Faden, a partner with the Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, a law firm that works with individuals and funds on opportunity zone investments.
Dual Purposes of Opportunity Zone Funds
Opportunity zone funds have two basis purposes: to provide investors a long-term tax-advantaged investment and to encourage economic growth in distressed communities.
But while the Treasury has issued almost 250 pages of proposed regulations on investments and tax treatment for opportunity funds, in two installments, there are currently few requirements for tracking these investments and none to measure their social and economic impact.
To that end, the IRS, a bureau of the U.S. Treasury, also recently published a request for information soliciting input on data collection and tracking for qualified opportunity zones. The IRS is asking for ideas about how to revise Form 8996, which funds must file annually, to include, among other things, a fund's impact on economic development and job creation in distressed communities and data useful for measuring a fund's attractiveness for investors.
Fran Seegull, executive director of U.S. Impact Investing Alliance, which helped create a reporting framework for opportunity zone funds, is pleased that the IRS is addressing the reporting issue but believes its approach to require only aggregate information, released with a lag, is too limiting. She testified before the IRS in February about the importance of data collection on opportunity zones because investors need to deploy capital into funds within 180 days of realizing capital gains.
Quinn Palomino, principal of Virtua Partners, a global private equity firm specializing in real estate that has already broken ground on its first opportunity zone fund investment — a SpringHill Suites by Marriott in the western suburbs of Phoenix — suggests that fund reporting be simple.
It should include a breakdown of the number jobs created with salaries and training for opportunities for upward mobility and, in the case of housing developments, the number of units created at market rate, workforce rate (priced for those earning 80%-120% of area median income) and affordable rate (for those earning below 80% of area median income), says Palomino. "We aim for 10-25% of workforce and affordable housing as a rule," said Palomino.
That may not be enough for investors who are especially interested in the social impact purpose of opportunity zone funds, but it will likely satisfy investors focused on the funds' tax advantages.
"I haven't gotten anybody who's interested on the impact side," says Cordaro. " It's been on the tax side."
— Check out Conservative-Leaning Tax Think Tank Questions Opportunity Zones on ThinkAdvisor.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Tuesday Newspaper
- 2Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-85
- 3Decision of the Day: Administrative Court Finds Prevailing Wage Law Applies to Workers Who Cleaned NYC Subways During Pandemic
- 4Trailblazing Broward Judge Retires; Legacy Includes Bush v. Gore
- 5Federal Judge Named in Lawsuit Over Underage Drinking Party at His California Home
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250