Ahead of the Curve; Inside Harvard Law School's Zero-L Program
This week's Ahead of the Curve looks at a fledgling online program that helps incoming Harvard Law students prepare for law school, and breaks down some of the latest bar passage data.
May 07, 2019 at 11:12 AM
8 minute read
Welcome back to Ahead of the Curve. I'm Karen Sloan, legal education editor at Law.com, and I'll be your host for this weekly look at innovation and notable developments in legal education.
This week, I'm looking at Harvard Law School's new Zero-L program, which gives incoming students a sneak peek at what's on their horizon. Next, I'm checking in on the latest bar exam statistics from the American Bar Association to see how the Class of 2016 fared two years after graduating. Read on!
Please share your thoughts and feedback with me at [email protected] or on Twitter: @KarenSloanNLJ
➤ Would you like to receive Ahead of the Curve by email? Sign up here.
An On Ramp for Harvard 1Ls
Harvard Law School's incoming class of students will get a head start on their legal studies this summer. The school will soon launch the second iteration of its Zero-L program—a first-of-its kind curriculum of online courses designed to give new students some legal basics and a roadmap of what to expect once they arrive on campus.
I caught up with professor Glenn Cohen, who developed Zero-L with associate dean for strategic initiatives Jessica Soban at the direction of dean John Manning, to talk about the program and how it's evolving after the pilot last summer. What initially struck me was that Zero-L has a very different focus than the existing pre-1L programs that I'm familiar with. Those tend to target admitted students with relatively low LSAT scores who may benefit from a legal foundation before they begin. Cohen confirmed my hunch that Zero-L didn't come about because Harvard was worried that its new 1Ls wouldn't be able to keep up. (Its median LSAT this year was 173. They'll be fine.) Rather, the school hopes that the program will give new students a smoother transition into law school life. Here's Cohen:
“I always tell my students there is an optimal level of anxiety in law school. It's not zero, but it's also not 100. My own sense is that most law students come in with an anxiety level in the first week that's much higher than I think is productive for them. A big part of my goal for [Zero-L] is to get people to relax a little bit. To realize it will take a little while to get used to this. Another metaphor one of my students told me once was, 'Law school is little bit like a race where you're not racing against other people. You're racing in the dark and you have no idea where you're supposed to be, what you're supposed to be doing, and how this is supposed to work.' I want to shine as much light on the front end as I can.”
Moreover, a growing percentage of Harvard Law students don't come in with the traditional political science major or from middle and upper-class backgrounds. The increasing number of STEM majors and first-generation college students coming to law school may benefit from some legal basics and an introduction to the legal profession, Cohen said.
Here's how the program works:
➤➤ Last year's pilot began with 10 hours of online modules covering a swath of legal topics and introductions to law school life. The school has since expanded those offerings to 14 hours, and is deciding whether or not to whittle that down.
➤➤ Modules include common law, civil procedure, checks and balances, and federalism, as well as topics such as how to read and brief a case and the purpose of the Socratic Method. The expanded offerings this summer include law and economics and legal history.
➤➤ The modules are not graded, though there are built-in assessments that help students gauge their grasp of the material.
➤➤ At this point, the program is not mandatory, though administrators told last year's incoming students that their professors would teach with the expectation that they had completed the online program.
Different professors appear in different modules, which has the added bonus of introducing new students to the faculty, Cohen said. The early results have been positive. Surveys of this year's 1Ls found that the program helped them feel better prepared and excited for law school. Harvard plans to roll out Zero-L a month earlier this summer to give students more time to complete the program.
My Take: I like this idea. On the one hand, you don't want to overwhelm incoming students with work in their last summer before their life is basically taken over by law school. On the other hand, Zero-L is an acknowledgment that law school really is a whole new world and that even highly qualified students can use a little help when it comes to navigating the unfamiliar landscape. (This ain't The Paper Chase, folks.) In fact, this seems like a pretty cost effective way to give incoming students a smoother on-ramp. Once you develop the videos, it shouldn't cost much to make them available to each year of new 1Ls.
Unsurprisingly, Cohen told me that Harvard has already been approached by other law schools with inquiries about sharing Zero-L. It's an idea the school is open to, he said. (Interested parties should reach out to him directly.)
Very tangentially related: According to this story in Variety, Scott Turow's 1977 book One-L—a non-fiction account of his first year at Harvard Law School—is in the early stages of being developed as a television show for the Freeform channel. The pitch? The show follows “five uniquely gifted students who bond as they navigate the perils of their first year of law school and come to terms with who they want to be, while grappling with their complicated pasts.” But will it feature Zero-L? I'm guessing not.
Bar Exam Breakdowns
The final installment of my four-part series on falling bar pass rates, The Big Fail, came out earlier today.
The series looked at reasons behind the decline; what law school are doing about it; how increased failures are impacting legal employers; and how law graduates cope with failing the exam.
As luck would have it, late last month the American Bar Association also released its annual report on bar pass rates, which showed that the nationwide first-time pass rate in 2018 fell from 77 to 75%. Ouch. The ABA also provided the so-called “ultimate bar pass rate” for the class of 2016, which is the percentage of those graduates who passed the bar within two years. That figure held steady at 88 percent.
I don't want to rehash that earlier coverage, but I do want to point to a couple of helpful posts over on the Faculty Lounge blog that take a close look at the latest numbers.
➤ First, South Texas College of Law Houston professor Gary Rosin wrote a post highlighting the schools with ultimate bar pass rates below 75 percent in either 2015 or 2016, identifying them as at risk.
— Fourteen schools made the list in both years, including two of Puerto Rico's three law schools and three that are closed or in the process of closing. So no major surprises there.
— But Rosin highlights some interesting changes. American University Washington College of Law's ultimate pass rate shot up to 83 percent in 2016 after landing at 75% the previous year. Howard University School of Law's ultimate pass rate fell 18% in 2016 to 55%. And Syracuse University College of Law went from an ultimate pass rate of 71% in 2015 to 90% in 2016.
➤ Meanwhile attorney David Frakt breaks down the numbers in a separate post that ties first-time pass rates in 2018 to weak LSAT scores for the incoming 2015 class. Here's Frakt:
“The key takeaway from the 2018 first-time bar pass rates is this: VERY LOW LSATS = VERY LOW BAR PASS RATES. No law school has cracked the code on how to turn very low LSAT scorers into first-time bar passers on a consistent basis. Responsible law schools should be extremely cautious in admitting any students with an LSAT at 146 or below, taking only those students with substantially better than average grades, and should follow North Carolina Central's decision to never admit anyone with an LSAT below 142.”
|
Extra Credit Reading
● The Class of 2018 had a pretty good year on the employment front. The percentage of grads in fulltime, long-term jobs that require a law degree was the highest in a decade, ABA data shows.
● More than half the recent law school graduates polled by Kaplan Test Prep say their schools did not provide enough mental health support.
● U.S. News & World Report sought to reassure law school deans who are worried about its planned introduction this year of a scholarly impact ranking using law review citations and other sources.
Thanks for reading Ahead of the Curve. Sign up for the newsletter and check out past issues here.
I'll be back next week with more news and updates on the future of legal education. Until then, keep in touch at [email protected]
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Friday Newspaper
- 2Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 3Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 4NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 5A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250