Compliance Hot Spots: SG's Office Defends False Claims Act; Tech Lobbying; FTC's Facebook Divide; Lateral Moves; Who Got the Work
The US Justice Department is pushing back against claims the False Claims Act violates the Constitution's appointments clause. Plus: there's a new lobbying push on Capitol Hill involving "digital service taxes." Scroll down for Who Got the Work and an epic list of new hires and notable moves. Thanks for reading!
May 07, 2019 at 09:00 PM
11 minute read
Good evening from Washington—and welcome to Compliance Hot Spots, our roundup of news and analysis of regulatory and enforcement trends. Tips, feedback and general thoughts on your practices always appreciated. I'm your host, C. Ryan Barber. Reach me at [email protected] and 202-828-0315, or follow me on Twitter @cryanbarber.
A Constitutional Challenge to False Claims Act
In the U.S. Supreme Court, the Justice Department is defending the constitutionality of a federal law that allows whistleblowers to recoup fraudulent claims for payment on the government's behalf.
U.S. Solicitor General Noel Francisco has urged the justices to reject a challenge to the False Claims Act arising out of a whistleblower case alleging that Intermountain Healthcare, a Utah-based healthcare provider, improperly billed the government for unnecessary treatments.
Intermountain, represented by a team from McDermott Will & Emery, argued that the False Claims Act violates the Constitution's appointments clause by allowing whistleblowers—known under the law as “qui tam relators”—to bring civil cases prosecuting fraud against the U.S. government.
Francisco, joined on the brief by Assistant Attorney General Jody Hunt, and department lawyers Michael Raab and Sarah Carroll, contested the claim that the False Claims Act allows whistleblowers to effectively take on the role of government officials.
“A qui tam relator is more aptly analogized, not to a Justice Department attorney who represents the United States in litigation, but to a plaintiff who asserts a private right of action under a federal statute. Congress's decision to authorize private lawsuits may often rest in part on its belief that such actions will vindicate a societal interest in deterring and remedying violations of federal law,” the solicitor general (at right) argued in a brief in opposition to certiorari.
“As with plaintiffs who sue under other federal statutes, the potential for qui tam relators to furnish practical assistance in the enforcement of federal law does not transform them into 'officers of the United States' whose selection is governed by the Appointments Clause.”
Francisco pointed also to the authority the Justice Department has in False Claims Act cases, even after passing on the chance to intervene in them. For instance, the Justice Department can move to dismiss or settle cases over the objections of whistleblowers, and it can overrule a whistleblower's proposed settlement or dismissal of a False Claims Act case.
Elsewhere in the department, civil division lawyers are more aggressively asserting their authority to dismiss False Claims Act cases.
Under the Trump administration, the Justice Department issued guidance urging prosecutors to step in and move to dismiss whistleblower cases deemed to be meritless. In December alone, the Justice Department moved to dismiss 11 whistleblower lawsuits against drugmakers. But a top Justice Department official said in March that dismissal “will remain the exception, not the rule” in the government's approach to whistleblower cases.
McDermott's M. Miller Baker, co-chair of the firm's appellate group, is counsel of record for Intermountain Health Care. McDermott represents the company with a team from Polsinelli PC.
“This court should decide Intermountain's Appointments Clause challenge to the FCA, which presents an issue this court expressly reserved in Vermont Agency,” Baker wrote in Intermountain's petition. He pointed to a statement made by the late Justice Antonin Scalia in that 2000 case: “In so concluding, we express no view on the question whether qui tam suits violate Article II, in particular the Appointments Clause of § 2 and the 'take Care' Clause of § 3.”
Baker wrote: “Indeed, the answer to the unresolved question in Vermont Agency is that the FCA's qui tam provisions violate the Appointments Clause because (1) relators are officers; or, alternatively, (2) the FCA impermissibly vests a core function of officers—civil law enforcement—in nonofficer relators.”
Who Got the Work
>> Baker McKenzie partner Joshua Odintz in Washington has registered to lobby for a host of tech companies—including Twitter, Amazon, Facebook and Google—on “issues relating to digital service taxes.” Odintz, a former tax counsel at the Senate Finance Committee, serves on the management committee of Baker McKenzie's North American tax practice group. My colleague Cheryl Miller has more here.
>> A team from Kelley Drye & Warren has registered to lobby for Verizon Communications on “issues related to Net Neutrality legislation; issues related to infrastructure/broadband deployment; issues related to privacy legislation.” The lobbyists include Paul Rosenthal and Dana Wood, the co-leaders of the firm's government relations and public policy group.
>> Venable LLP has registered to lobby for Privacy for America, a “coalition in support of comprehensive federal consumer data privacy and security legislation.” The registration noted “internet, marketing, and data protection issues, including potential comprehensive federal consumer data privacy and security legislation.”
>> Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld partner Estela Díaz represented GT Advanced Technologies Inc. as the company resolved claims that it misled investors about its ability to supply “sapphire glass” for Apple iPhones. The Securities and Exchange Commission accused the company of also misclassifying more than $300 million in debt to Apple that resulted from its repeated failures to meet performance milestones. GT Advanced agreed to cease and desist from further violations and its former CEO, Thomas Gutierrez, agreed to pay $140,000. Gutierrez was represented by Morgan, Lewis & Bockius partner Jordan Hershman, who leads the firm's securities litigation team.
Compliance Headlines That I'm Reading
>> FTC Wants to Punish Facebook, but the Divided Agency May Go Only So Far. “The F.T.C.'s five commissioners agreed months ago that they wanted to pursue a historic penalty that would show the agency's teeth. But now, the members are split on the size and scope of the tech company's punishment, according to three people with knowledge of the talks who spoke on the condition of anonymity. The division is complicating the final days of the talks.” FTC Chairman Joe Simons (above) wants to avoid a 3-2 vote on party lines. “The stakes are enormous for the agency and Mr. Simons. The case is being closely watched globally as a litmus test on how the United States government will police the country's tech giants.” [NYT] Politico has more here.
>> OFAC Speaks Loudly, Carries a Bigger Stick. “After an unusually quiet year bringing enforcement cases in 2018, the U.S. Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (“OFAC”) has assumed an unprecedented pace in 2019—since January 31, OFAC has announced 14 settlements for violations of U.S. sanctions laws, an average of one per week.” [Dechert]
>> Treasury Sets Expectations for Sanctions Compliance Programs. “The framework issued by the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control on Thursday signals the agency wants companies to have an active sanctions compliance program, rather than a written policy alone, as the U.S. sanctions program becomes more dynamic and complex.” [The Wall Street Journal]
>> Washington's Biggest Lobbyist, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, Gets Shut Out. “After eight years tussling with the Obama administration, the chamber hoped a business-friendly administration would help reanimate its power. But Mr. Trump's populism has refashioned the GOP agenda, and that has cut against priorities of various chamber constituencies that oppose tariffs and view immigration as a useful labor supply.” [The Wall Street Journal]
>> Driverless Car Industry Luring Federal Safety Brass. “Companies like Uber, Lyft, General Motors and Google's sibling Waymo have hired a phalanx of current and former Washington officials, including Obama administration Transportation Secretary Anthony Foxx, several DOT highway regulators and two former chairs of the National Transportation Safety Board, the federal agency that investigates deadly crashes.” [Politico]
>> Consumer Bureau Moves to Cap Debt Collectors' Calls, and Allow Texts and Emails. “A set of proposed rules, released on Tuesday by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, is the latest step in a yearslong process to revise federal debt-collection rules that have not been significantly altered for more than four decades. The new rules would bar collectors from making more than seven phone calls a week to a debtor. Once they make contact, collectors would have to wait a week before calling again.” [NYT]
>> Who Is the Lawyer Pre-Reading Elon Musk's Tweets? ”Elon Musk's latest agreement with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission requires the chief executive officer get pre-approval from securities counsel before tweeting about Tesla Inc. finances, but it's not yet clear who that lawyer is or if he or she has been selected,” my colleague Caroline Spiezio writes. [Law.com]
>> Judge Green-Lights NY Suit Against Federal Agency Over Fintech Charters. The New York Department of Financial Services is suing the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency over a decision to essentially label fintech companies as banks, saying it will diminish its power to regulate the activities of those entities, my colleague Dan M. Clark reports. [New York Law Journal]
>> Senators Shaping Federal Privacy Law Get Input From Irish GDPR Regulator. Members of the Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation raised their concerns with data privacy regulation on a federal level with witness Helen Dixon, the Irish data protection commissioner, whose agency oversees GDPR compliance for Facebook, Twitter, Uber and other U.S. tech companies incorporated in Ireland. [Corporate Counsel]
Notable Moves & Announcements
• Hogan Lovells has added longtime federal prosecutor and former Securities and Exchange Commission enforcement division lawyer Ann Kim to its litigation department, focusing on securities. “We have been strategically expanding our practice,” Los Angeles managing partner Michael Maddigan said in a statement.
• Greg Andres, who'd served on the Robert Mueller special counsel team, has returned to Davis Polk & Wardwell.
• The IRS has appointed Monte Jackel as special counsel to Michael Desmond, the agency's chief counsel. Jackel was formerly a senior tax counsel at Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld.
• Arnold & Porter has hired Charles Yi (at left) in Washington as a partner in the firm's financial services and legislative and public policy practices. Yi served as general counsel to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation from 2015-2019.
• Proskauer Rose is building out its litigation bench in New York with the addition of former federal prosecutor Seetha Ramachandran. Ramachandran joins Proskauer from Schulte Roth & Zabel, which she joined in 2014 after nearly a decade in public service.
• Jones Day has hired David Applebaum, former head of investigations at the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, as a partner in Washington.
• Manatt, Phelps & Phillips has added Robert Garretson as a managing director in the firm's government and regulatory group in Washington. Garretson joins from U.S. Steel Corporation, where he had been general manager of governance strategy with the legal and compliance team.
• Locke Lord has hired Brian Devine as a white-collar and investigations partner in the firm's Boston office. Devine joins the firm from Goodwin Procter, where he was a partner focusing on securities litigation.
• Leanne Geale (at left), chief ethics and compliance officer at Royal Dutch Shell, is joining Nestlé to serve as the Swiss company's executive vice president and general counsel. Geale begins her new role Aug. 1 and will oversee the company's legal and compliance functions.
• Boeing has announced that Brett Gerry, president of Boeing Japan, will be the company's new general counsel. Gerry succeeds J. Michael Luttig, who will stay with the company in a new role as counselor and senior adviser to CEO Dennis Muilenburg.
• Two lawyers who worked in General Electric's legal department to address compliance risks have started their own boutique in New York. Patricia O'Prey and Grace Wen said their new firm, O'Prey Wen, will focus on internal investigations, litigation and compliance services. Wen most recently practiced at Binder & Schwartz. O'Prey recently worked at the power generation company ContourGlobal plc.
• After 20 years of working behind the scenes in government, John Abegg, chief counsel to U.S. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, has joined the U.S. Chamber Institute for Legal Reform. Abegg will become executive vice president of the institute on May 13, replacing Harold Kim, who was promoted to chief operating officer.
|This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCompliance Hot Spots: GOP Eyes ESG as an Antitrust Issue + Another DOJ Crypto Seizure + Sidley Partner Jumps to Main Justice
9 minute readCompliance Hot Spots: Lessons from Lafarge + Fraud Section Chief Talks Compliance + Cravath Lands FTC Commissioner
11 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250