How to Gain a Competitive Edge in Environmental Law with Legal Analytics
As environmental litigation evolves, and a potential crop of new legal issues on the horizon with global climate change becoming more present, litigators need every edge they can find to formulate a winning case strategy.
May 15, 2019 at 12:00 PM
4 minute read
[ON DEMAND]
If you have previously registered for this event, please click here, and log-in using the email you registered with to access the on-demand event.
Cost: Complimentary
Sponsored by:
As environmental litigation evolves, and a potential crop of new legal issues arise with global climate change becoming more present, litigators need every edge they can find to formulate a winning case strategy.
In this timely webcast, Carla Rydholm, Director of Product Development at Lex Machina, will explore how applying Legal Analytics to environmental law can help you win more cases, land more clients, and predict the behavior of judges, parties, and opposing counsel.
Join this webcast to learn how litigators can leverage Legal Analytics, including:
- Gaining critical insights into environmental specific damages and remedies to craft winning settlement strategies.
- Analyzing the performance of attorneys and law firms.
- Analyzing how long it will take them to reach key litigation milestones (time to trial, summary judgment, termination, and more).
- Anticipating case outcomes, findings and assessing the chances for damages being awarded.
- Plus much more.
REGISTER NOW!
Speakers:
Carla Rydholm | Director of Product Management | Lex Machina As Director of Product Management, Carla leads Lex Machina's efforts to analyze and curate the highest quality case and docket data. Carla previously practiced public interest law at the First Amendment Project, a non-profit advocacy organization dedicated to promoting access to information. She earned a J.D. from Duke University, where she co-founded the Duke Journal for Law & Social Change. She also earned a Ph.D. from Duke in genetics & genomics and microbial evolution and a B.Sc. from the University of British Columbia. | |
Deborah Sivas | Professor of Environmental Law | Stanford A leading environmental litigator, Deborah A. Sivas, JD '87, is director of the highly regarded Environmental Law Clinic, in which students provide legal counsel to dozens of national, regional and grassroots nonprofit organizations on a variety of environmental issues. Professor Sivas's litigation successes include challenging the Bush administration's gas mileage standards for SUVs and light trucks and holding the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency accountable for regulating the discharge of invasive species in ship ballast water. Her current research is focused on the interaction of law and science in the arena of climate change and coastal/marine policy and the ability of the public to hold policymakers accountable. She is a frequent speaker on these topics. Prior to assuming the clinic directorship in 1997, Professor Sivas was a partner at Gunther, Sivas & Walthall, an attorney with Earthjustice (formerly Sierra Club Legal Defense Fund), an associate in the environmental practice group at Heller Ehrman and a law clerk to Judge Judith N. Keep of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California. She currently serves as chair for the board of directors for the Turtle Island Restoration Network. In recognition of her work on behalf of the environment, California Lawyer magazine named Professor Sivas one of its 2008 Attorneys of the Year. | |
Michael C. Davis | Partner | Venable Mike Davis represents government agencies, developers, lenders, and others in complex litigation and business transactions involving a variety of issues, including construction, insurance, transportation, and environmental. He has been involved in some of the most significant redevelopment projects in the country, including New York's World Trade Center, Washington, DC's Poplar Point redevelopment project, and the redevelopment of Long Island City, New York. Mike counsels clients representing a diverse range of industries, including insurance, environmental, construction, government contracting, manufacturing, urban redevelopment, finance, transportation, pharmaceuticals, risk transfer, and financial services. |
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllThe Narrow Path Back From Disbarment: 'You Have to Really Want to Be a Lawyer Again'
5 minute readNew Jersey Law Journal Names Mike Zogby Office Managing Partner of the Year
2 minute readClimate Disputes, International Arbitration, and State Court Limitations for Global Issues
Trending Stories
- 1People in the News—Nov. 21, 2024—Willig Williams, Hangley Aronchick
- 2Rawle & Henderson Hires New Del. Managing Partner
- 3Divided State Court Reinstates Dispute Over Replacement Vehicles Fees
- 4Construction Worker Hit By Falling Concrete Settles Claims for $2.3M
- 5Phila. Jury Hits Sig Sauer With $11M Verdict Over Alleged Gun Defect
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250